1887

Abstract

Surmmary

A new, simple and stable method for typing strains is described. The 150 strains examined, principally from faeces, contained haemolytic and non-haemolytic representatives of diverse O serogroup, bacteriocin type and biotype. Among the biotypes were some trehalose-fermenting, tetracycline-resistant strains and some non-motile, tetracycline-sensitive, glycerol fermenters. After analysis of cell lysates by sodium dodecyl sulphate-discontinuous polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, strains could be differentiated into 21 types on the basis of outer membrane proteins (OMP) of 35–40 Kda. The OMP profile was not altered by culture on various common media and was unrelated to either O antigen or morganocin p-type. The finest strain recognition in can be achieved by application of all three distinct typing methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-33-4-259
1990-12-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/33/4/medmicro-33-4-259.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-33-4-259&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hedges RW, Datta N, Coetzee JN, Dennison S. R factors from Proteus morganii. J Gen Microbiol 1973; 77:249–259
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tucci V, Isenberg HD. Hospital cluster epidemic with Morganella morganii. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14:563–566
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Williams EW, Hawkey PM, Penner JL, Senior BW, Barton LJ. Serious nosocomial infection caused by Morganella morganii and Proteus mirabilis in a cardiac surgery unit. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:5–9
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Senior BW. Proteus morgani is less frequently associated with urinary tract infections than Proteus mirabilis—an explanation. J Med Microbiol 1983; 16:317–322
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Braunstein H, Tomasulo M. Identification of Proteus morganii and distinction from other Proteus species. Am J Clin Pathol 1978; 70:905–908
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Senior B W. The special affinity of particular types of Proteus mirabilis for the urinary tract. J Med Microbiol 1979; 12:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Emödy L, Vörös S, Pal T. Alpha-haemolysin, a possible virulence factor in Proteus morganii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1982; 13:329–331
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Senior BW, Hughes C. Production and properties of haemolysins from clinical isolates of the Proteeae. J Med Microbiol 1988; 25:17–25
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Koronakis V, Cross M, Senior B, Koranakis E, Hughes C. The secreted hemolysins of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, and Morganella morganii are genetically related to each other and to the alpha-hemolysin of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 1987; 169:1509–1515
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgan H, de R. Upon the bacteriology of the summer diarrhoea of infants. Br Med J 1906; 1:908–912
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tribondeau L, Fichet M. Note sur les dysenteries des Dardanelles. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 1916; 30:357–362
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thjotta T. On the bacillus of Morgan No. 11—a meta-colon bacillus. J Bacteriol 1920; 5:67–77
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Magheru A. Recherches experimentales sur le Bacille de Morgan. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 1923; 89:643–645
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rauss KF. The systematic position of Morgan’s Bacillus. J Path Bacteriol 1936; 42:183–192
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rauss K, Vörös S. The biochemical and serological properties of Proteus morganii. Acta Microbiol Hung 1959; 6:233–248
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schmidt WC, Jeffries CD. Bacteriophage typing of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, and Proteus morganii. Appl Microbiol 1974; 27:47–53
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Senior BW. The typing of Morganella morgani by bacteriocin production and sensitivity. J Med Microbiol 1987; 23:33–39
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Rauss K, Puzova H, Dubay L, Velin D, Doliák M, Vörös S. New serotypes of Morganella morganii. Acta Microbiol Hung 1975; 22:315–321
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Vörös S, Senior B W. New O antigens in Morganella morganii and the relationships between haemolysin production and O serotype and morganocin type of strain. Acta Microbiol Hung (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Senior BW, Vörös S. Discovery of new morganocin types of Morganella morganii in strains of diverse serotype and the apparent independence of bacteriocin type from serotype of strains. J Med Microbiol 1989; 29:89–93
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lugtenberg B, Meijers J, Peters R, van der Hoek P, van Alphen L. Electrophoretic resolution of the ‘major outer membrane protein’ of Escherichia coli K12 into four bands. FEBS Lett 1975; 58:254–258
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Siboni K. Correlation of the characters fermentation of trehalose, non-transmissible resistance to tetracycline, and relatively long flagellar wavelength in Proteus morganii. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand (B) 1976; 84:421–427
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ewing WH. (ed) Edwards and Ewing’s Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. , 4th edn.. New York; Elsevier: 1986449
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hickman FW, Farmer JJ, Steigerwalt AG, Brenner DJ. Unusual groups of Morganella (“Proteus”) morganii isolated from clinical specimens: lysine-positive and ornithine-negative biogroups. J Clin Microbiol 1980; 12:88–94
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Farmer JJ, Davis BR, Hickman-Brenner FW. et al. Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21:46–76
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Comelis G, van Bouchaute M, Wauters G. Plasmid-encoded lysine decarboxylation in Proteus morganii. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14:365–369
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-33-4-259
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-33-4-259
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error