The effect of antibiotics that inhibit cell-wall, protein, and DNA synthesis on the growth and morphology of Free

Abstract

Summary

The response of to antibiotics that inhibit cell-wall, protein and DNA synthesis was examined by electronmicroscopy, MIC estimations and viable counts. Ampicillin, cefotaxime, methicillin, erythromycin, rifampicin and ciprofloxacin, each used separately at 20 times their respective MIC values, showed activity against in these studies. The inhibitors of cell-wall synthesis—ampicillin, cefotaxime and methicillin—effected the greatest bactericidal activity and induced the most extensive morphological changes, which included the formation of membranous lesions through which cytoplasmic contents were lost. In terms of ultrastructural damage and loss of viability, the inhibitors of protein and DNA synthesis were less effective than the antibiotics that acted on the microbial cell wall. Erythromycin- and rifampicin-treated cells possessed irregular membranes and were partially or fully lysed, whereas ciprofloxacin induced abnormally elongated organisms with intermittently lysed and detached inner membranes. These results illustrated the ability of antibiotics of putative clinical value, with diverse modes of action, to affect the ultrastructural cytology as well as the viability of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-31-1-37
1990-01-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/31/1/medmicro-31-1-37.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-31-1-37&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rodgers F G. Ultrastructure of Legionella pneumophila. J Clin Pathol 1979; 32:195–202
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rodgers F G, Davey M R. Ultrastructure of the cell envelope layers and surface details of Legionella pneumophila. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128:547–1557
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Elliott T S J, Rodgers F G. Morphological response and growth characteristics of Legionella pneumophila exposed to ampicillin and erythromycin. J Med Microbiol 1985; 9:83–390
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodgers F G, Elliott T S J. Antibiotic killing of Legionella. Lancet 1984; 1:684
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan E L, Harris R C, Dalton H P. The effect of antibiotics on the cell morphology of Legionella pneumophila. J Med Microbiol 1987; 23:49–154
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thornsberry C, Baker C N, Kirven L A. In vitro activity of antimicrobial agents on Legionnaires' disease bacterium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978; 13:78–80
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Havlichek D, Saravolatz L, Pohlod D. Effect of quinolones and other antimicrobial agents on cell-associated Legionella pneumophila. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:1529–1534
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vilde J L, Dournon E, Rajagopalan P. Inhibition of Legionella pneumophila multiplication within human macrophages by antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30:743–748
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tzianabos A O, Rodgers F G. Pathogenesis and chemotherapy of experimental Legionella pneumophila infection in the chick embryo. Zbl Bakt Hyg (In press).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitzgeorge R B, Baskerville A, Featherstone A S R. Treatment of experimental Legionnaires' disease by aerosol adminstration of rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and erythromycin. Lancet 1986; 1:502–503
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fitzgeorge R B, Gibson D H, Jepras R, Baskerville A. Studies on ciprofloxacin therapy of experimental Legionnaires'disease. J Infect 1985; 10:94–203
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Oldham L J, Rodgers F G. Adhesion, penetration and intracellular replication of Legionella pneumophila: an in vitro model of pathogenesis. J Gen Microbiol 1985; 131:97–706
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tzianabos A O, Rodgers F G. Electron microscopy of the pathology and chemotherapy of experimental Legionella pneumophila infection in the chick embryo. Zbl Bakt Hyg (In press).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edelstein P H. Improved semiselective medium for isolation of Legionella pneumophila from contaminated clinical and environmental specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14:98–303
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dennis P J, Taylor J A, Barrow G I. Phosphate buffered, low sodium chloride blood agar medium for Legionella pneumophila. Lancet 1981; 2:636
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodgers F G, Greaves P W, Macrae A D, Lewis M J. Electron microscopic evidence of flagella and pili on Legionella pneumophila. J Clin Pathol 1980; 33:1184–1188
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nation J L. A new method using hexamethyldisilazane for preparation of soft insect tissues for scanning electron microscopy. Stain Technol 1983; 58:347–351
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones R N, Barry A L, Gavan T L, Washington J A. Susceptibility tests: microdilution and macrodilution broth procedures.. In: Lennette E H, Balows A, Hausler W J, Shadomy H J (eds) Manual of Clinical Microbiology. , 4th edn. Washington: American Society for Microbiology; 1985972–977
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nishino T, Nakazawa S. Bacteriological study on effects of beta-lactam group antibiotics in high concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976; 9:1033–1042
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirby B D, Snyder K M, Meyer R D, Finegold S M. Legionnaires' disease: report of sixty-five nosocomial acquired cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1980; 59:18–205
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoshida S, Mizuguchi Y. Antibiotic susceptibility of Legionella pneumophila, Philadelphia-1, in cultured guinea-pig peritoneal macrophages. J Gen Microbiol 1984; 30:01–906
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-31-1-37
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-31-1-37
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed