1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Three sublines of HeLa cells were infected with type 1, and and compared with mycoplasma-free cells for their ability to support the growth of adenovirus types 2 and 31, herpes simplex virus, Sabin’s poliovirus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 2, respiratory syncytial virus and vaccinia virus. Titres of herpesvirus and adenovirus tended to be reduced in the cells infected with mycoplasmas, but titres of the other viruses were generally raised by such infection. The largest differences in titre in either direction were approximately ten-fold and were obtained with adenovirus type 2 (reduction) and vaccinia virus (increase). Much smaller effects were noted with the other viruses.

With herpesviruses and adenoviruses, which have a known requirement for arginine, the antagonistic effect of the two arginine-metabolising mycoplasmas, type 1 and , was more than that of , which does not metabolise arginine. With the other viruses, the higher titres obtained in the mycoplasma-infected cells were independent of the species of mycoplasma. The cell lines infected with were difficult to maintain for long periods on account of the cytopathic effects of this species, and were, therefore, less suitable for titration of the more slowly growing herpes- and adeno-viruses.

It is concluded that mycoplasma contamination of a HeLa cell line may interfere with the titration of some viruses, but the effects are relatively small and probably do not constitute a serious hazard in routine diagnostic virology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-3-2-259
1970-05-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/3/2/medmicro-3-2-259.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-3-2-259&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andrews B. E. 1969 In Mycoplasma diseases of man ed. by Sprossig M., Jena W. Witzleb.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barile M. F., Delgiudice R. A., Carski R. T., Gibbs C. J., Morris J. A. 1968 Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 129:489
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barile M. F., Schimke R. T., Riggs D. 1966 J. Bact 91:189
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker Y., Olshevsky U., Levitt J. 1967 Virology, J. Gen Virol 1:417
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brownstein B., Graham A. F. 1961 J. Gen. Microbiol 14:303
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler M., Leach R. H. 1964 J. Gen microbial 34:285
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Clyde W. A. Jr 1964 J. Immun 92:858
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldblum N., Ravid Z., Becker Y. 1968 J. Gen. Virol 3:143
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gori G. B., Lee D. Y. 1964 Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 117:918
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayflick L. 1965 Tex. Rep. Biol. Med 23:285
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayflick L., Stanbridge E. 1967 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 143:608
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Herderschee D., Ruys A. C., van Rhijn G. R. 1963 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 29:386
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kagan G. Y. 1967 Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 143:734
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kagan G. Y., Kulikova K. S., Nue-stroeva V. V., Rezepova A. I., Sultanova Z. D. 1968 Vop. Virus 13:600
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Macpherson I. 1966 J. Cell Sci 1:145
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Neufahrt A., Rolly H., Schutze E. 1969 Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitK.de, Abt. I, Orig 209:470
    [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Connell R. C., Wittler R. G., Faber J. E. 1964 Appl. Microbiol 12:337
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Purcell R. H., Somerson N. L., Fox H., Wong D. C., Turner H. C., Chanock R. M. 1966 J. Natn. Cancer Inst 37:251
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Reed L. J., Muench H. 1938 Amer. J. Hyg 27:493
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rouse H. C., Bonifas V. H., Schlesinger R. W. 1963 Virology 20:357
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Singer S. H., Kirschstein Ruthl, Barile M. F. 1969 Nature Lond 222:1087
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Somerson N. L., Cook M. K. 1965 J. Bact 90:534
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-3-2-259
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-3-2-259
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error