1887

Abstract

Summary.

The hydrophobicity–hydrophilicity of various strains of has been studied by a technique involving partitioning of the cells between aqueous and hydrocarbon phases. was typically hydrophobic, and to a greater degree in stationary-than in exponential-phase cultures. Mutants that lacked teichoic acid, protein A or coagulase production were hydrophobic, indicating that none of these factors was responsible for hydrophobicity. The presence of a capsule rendered strains hydrophilic. Thus, determination of hydrophobicity may be a useful additional test for capsulation. However, a non-capsulate strain was hydrophilic. Trypsin treatment converted strains from hydrophobic to hydrophilic. Isolated bacterial cell wall preparation, either crude or purified, and peptidoglycan were hydrophilic. These results indicate that the determinant of hydrophobicity is a protein or protein-associated molecule localised at the cell surface of the organism, i.e., a component of either the cell wall, cell membrane, or both. Twenty-five strains of twelve coagulase-negative species were examined and most (18) were hydrophobic, again indicating that protein A is not a major determinant of hydrophobicity in these staphylococci. Four of seven hydrophilic strains were capsulate; three strains of were hydrophilic but non-capsulate.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-24-1-65
1987-08-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/24/1/medmicro-24-1-65.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-24-1-65&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Cruickshank R, Duguid J P, Marmion B P, Swain R H A. 1975; Medical microbiology. , 12. 2 Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh:42–43
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Finkelstein R A, Sulkin S E. 1958; Characteristics of coagulase positive and coagulase negative staphylococci in serum soft agar. Journal of Bacteriology 75:339–344
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Forsgren A. 1970; Significance of protein A production by staphylococci. Infection and Immunity 2:672–673
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Forsgren A, Sjöquist J. 1966; “Protein A” from S. aureus I. Pseudo-immune reaction with human γ-globulin. Journal of Immunology 97:822–827
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gramoli J L, Wilkinson B J. 1978; Characterization and identification of coagulase-negative, heat-stable deoxyri-bonuclease-positive staphylococci. Journal of General Microbiology 105:275–285
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hogt A H, Dankert J, devries J A, Feijen J. 1983a; Adhesion of coagulase-negative staphylococci to biomaterials. Journal of General Microbiology 129:2959–2968
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hogt A H, Dankert J, Feijen J. 1983b; Encapsulation, slime production and surface hydrophobicity of coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiology Letters 18:211–215
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hogt A H, Dankert J, Feijen J. 1985; Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus to a hydrophobic biomaterial. Journal of General Microbiology 131:2485–2491
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hogt A H, Dankert J, Hulstaert C E, Feijen J. 1986; Cell surface characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci and their adherence to fluorinated poly(ethylenepropylene). Infection and Immunity 51:294–301
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jonsson P, Lindberg M, Haraldsson I, Wadstrom T. 1985; Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse mastitis model : studies of alpha hemolysin, coagulase, and protein A as possible virulence determinants with protoplast fusion and gene cloning. Infection and Immunity 49:765–769
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jonsson P, Wadstrom T. 1983; High surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus aureus as revealed by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Current Microbiology 8:347–353
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kloos W E, Wolfshohl J F. 1982; Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH IDENT system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 16:509–516
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kronvall G, Quie P G, Williams R C. 1970; Quantitation of staphylococcal protein A : determination of equilibrium constant and number of protein A residues on bacteria. Journal of Immunology 104:273–278
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Malmqvist T. 1983; Bacterial hydrophobicity measured as partitioning of palmitic acid between the two immiscible phases of cell surface and buffer. Acta pathologica Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica Section B Microbiology 91:69–73
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Miörner H, Johansson G, Kronvall G. 1983; Lipoteichoic acid is the major cell wall component responsible for surface hydrophobicity of group A streptococci. Infection and Immunity 39:336–343
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Morris E J, Ganeshkumar N, McBride B C. 1985; Cell surface components of Streptococcus sanguis : relationship to aggregation, adherence and hydrophobicity. Journal of Bacteriology 164:255–262
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nesbitt W E, Doyle R J, Taylor K G. 1982; Hydrophobic interactions and the adherence of Streptococcus sanguis to hydroxylapatite. Infection and Immunity 38:637–644
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ofek I, Whitnack E, Beachey E H. 1983; Hydrophobic interactions of Group A streptococci with hexadecane droplets. Journal of Bacteriology 154:139–145
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Park J T, Shaw D R D, Chatterjee A N, Mirelman D, Wu T. 1974; Mutants of staphylococci with altered cell walls. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 236:54–62
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Peterson P K. 1978; The key role of peptidoglycan in the opsonization of Staphylococcus aureus . Journal of Clinical Investigation 61:597–609
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Peterson P K, Verhoef J, Sabath L D, Quie P G. 1977; Effect of protein A on staphylococcal opsonization. Infection and Immunity 15:760–764
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosenberg M. 1984; Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbons: a useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiology Letters 22:289–295
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E. 1980; Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiology Letters 9:29–33
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosenberg E, Kaplan N, Pines O, Rosenberg M, Gutnick D. 1983; Capsular polysaccharides interfere with adherence of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus to hydrocarbon. FEMS Microbiology Letters 17:157–160
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rozgonyi F, Szitha K R, Hjerten S, Wadstrom T. 1985; Standardization of salt aggregation test for reproducible determination of cell surface hydrophobicity with special reference to Staphylococcus species. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 59:451–457
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith M R, Yoshida K, Naito Y. 1971; Use of the clumping factor reaction for the identification of encapsulated strains of Staphylococcus aureus from human sources. Infection and Immunity 3:707–708
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sompolinsky D, Samra Z, Karakawa W W, Vann W F, Scheerson R, Malik Z. 1985; Encapsulation and capsular types in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from different sources and relationship to phage types. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 22:828–834
    [Google Scholar]
  28. West T E, Apicella M A. 1984; Detection of encapsulation in Staphylococcus aureus by use of antisemiti agar. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 20:141–144
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilkinson B J. 1983; Staphylococcal capsules and slime. Easmon C S F, Adlam C. Staphylococci and staphylococcal infections 2 Academic Press, Inc.; London:481–523
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilkinson B J, Kim Y, Peterson P K, Quie P G, Michael A F. 1978; Activation of complement by cell surface components of Staphylococcus aureus . Infection and Immunity 20:388–392
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilkinson J F. 1958; The extracellular polysaccharidesof bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews 11:46–73
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-24-1-65
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-24-1-65
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error