1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Comparison of the distributions of the O-groups of strains of isolated from infected urines in eleven previous studies has shown that there are statistically significant differences in the frequency distributions of certain O-groups between the findings in America and those in Europe. It is considered that in spite of differences in the methods of patient selection, the bacteriological methods and the levels of serological refinement used in the different investigations, these apparent intercontinental differences in O-group distribution are probably real.

In a study of the O-groups of the strains isolated from the urines of domiciliary patients with symptomatic infection of the urinary tract in three centres in north-west London, we have confirmed the preponderance of O-groups O2, O4, O6, O18 and O75 in all three localities. Nevertheless, the frequency of occurrence of certain O-groups differed significantly in the three localities, indicating that geographical differences occur not only between different continents but also between regions separated by only a few miles. This geographical variation in the O-group distribution of urinary strains of is presumably a reflection of a similar geographical variation in the O-groups of strains in the faecal flora.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-219
1969-08-01
2022-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/2/3/medmicro-2-3-219.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-219&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen H. J., Hanson L. A., Lincoln K., Ørskov Ida, Ørskov F., Winberg J. 1965 Acta paediat. scand 54:247
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewing W. H. 1956 Pbl. Hlth Lab 14:138
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grönroos J. A., Mustakallio E., Virtanen S. 1955 AnnIs Med. exp. Biol. Fenn 33:133
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grüneberg R. N., Leigh D. A., Brumfitt W. 1968 In Urinary tract infection ed. by O’Grady F., Brumfitt W. Oxford: p. 68
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guinée P. A. M. 1963 Thesis Univ. Utrecht;
  6. Kauffmann F. 1944 Acta path. microbiol. scand 21:20
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kennedy R. P., Plorde J. J., Petersdorf R. G. 1965 J. Clin. Invest 44:193
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kunin C. M., Deutscher R., Paquin A. Jr 1964 Medicine, Baltimore 43:91
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Leppänen M. K. 1958 Annls Med. exp. Biol. Fenn 36:Suppl.2
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McGeachie J. 1965 J. Clin. Path 18:428
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Maiztegui J. I., Kass E. H. 1965 In Progress in pyelonephritis ed. by Kass E. H. Philadelphia: p. 154
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Neter E., Steinhart J., Calcagno P. L., Rubin M. I. 1965 Ibid p. 129
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pryles C. V., Glagovsky Ann. 1965 Pediatrics 36:219
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rantz L. A. 1962 Archs Intern. Med 109:37
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sedlák J. 1955 Acta Univ. CarolSuppl 5:22
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sjösted S. 1946 Acta path, microbiol. scandSuppl3
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ujváry G. 1957-58 Zentbl. Bact Abt. I, Orig 170:394
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Vahlne G. 1945 Acta path. microbiol. scandSuppl62
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Vosti K. L., Goldberg L. M., Monto A. S., Rantz L. A. 1964 J. Clin. Invest 43:2377
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-219
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-2-3-219
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error