1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Strains of and isolated in England, Scotland and Sweden were characterised by proticine production-proticine sensitivity (P-S) typing, O serotyping and Dienes typing methods. The determinants of O antigenicity were independent of those determining proticine production and proticine sensitivity. Because of this independence, the combination of P-S typing and O serotyping for the analysis of the 133 serotypable strains separated them into 81 distinct types whereas P-S typing and O serotyping methods alone separated them into only 56 and 19 types respectively. There was a relationship between the Dienes type and the P-S type; the determinants of Dienes compatibility were the proticine production-proticine sensitivity characters. The determinants of O antigenicity appeared to play no role in the Dienes reaction. Some strains that were indistinguishable by P-S typing and O serotyping methods were distinguished by Dienes typing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-16-2-193
1983-05-01
2022-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/16/2/medmicro-16-2-193.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-16-2-193&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barry G. T., Everhart D. L., Abbott V., Graham M. G. 1965; Preparation, properties and relationship of substances possessing colicine A activity obtained from the Enterobacteriaceae. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie Parasitenkunde Infektions krankheiten und Hygiene I. Abt. Orig 196:248–263
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergstrom T. 1972; Sex differences in childhood urinary tract infection. Archives of Diseases of Childhood 47:227–232
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braude A. I., Siemienski J., Shapiro A. B. 1960; The role of bacterial urease in the pathogenesis of pyelonephritis. In Biology of pyelonephritis edited by Quinn E. L., Kass E. H. Microbiology Society; London: pp 69–88
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunliffe A. C., Krikler M. S. 1953; A cultural test for the presumptive serological identity of strains of Proteus vulgaris. Abstracts of 6th International Congress of Microbiology, Roma 1:861–862
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Louvois J. 1969; Serotyping and the Dienes reaction on Proteus mirabilis from hospital infections. Journal of Clinical Pathology 22:263–268
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairley K. F., Carson N.E., Gutch R.C., Leighton P., Grounds A.D., Laird E.C., McCallum P.H.G., Sleeman R.L., O’Keefe C.M. 1971; Site of infection in acute urinary tract infection in general practice. Lancet 2:615
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goebel W. F., Barry G. T. 1958; Colicine K. II. The preparation and properties of a substance having colicine K activity. Journal of Experimental Medicine 107:185–209
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Griffith D. P., Musher D. M., Campbell J. W. 1973; Inhibition of bacterial urease. Investigative Urology 11:234–238
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hallett R. J., Pead L., Maskell R. 1976; Urinary infection in boys. A three year prospective study. Lancet 2:1107–1110
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutton J. J., Goebel W. F. 1962; The isolation of colicine V and a study of its immunological properties. Journal of General Physiology 45: (Suppl.) 125–141
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kashbur I. M., George R. H., Ayliffe G. A. J. 1974; Resistotyping of Proteus mirabilis and a comparison with other methods of typing. Journal of Clinical Pathology 27:572–577
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kauffmann F. 1966; The Bacteriology of Enterobacteriaceae: collected studies. 3rd ed Williams and Wilkins; Baltimore: p 333
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lanyi B. 1956; Serological typing of Proteus strains from infantile enteritis and other sources. Acta Microbiologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 3:417–428
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Larsson P., Andersson H.E., Norlen B. 1978; Serotyping in epidemiological tracing of nosocomially acquired Proteus mirabilis in a geriatric ward. Infection 6:105–110
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Larsson P., Olling S. 1977; O antigen distribution and sensitivity to the bactericidal effect of normal human serum of Proteus strains from clinical specimens. Medical Microbiology and Immunology 163:77–82
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Penner J. L., Hennessy J. N. 1980; Separate O-grouping schemes for serotyping clinical isolates of Proteus vulgaris and Proteus mirabilis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12:304–309
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Perch B. 1948; On the serology of the Proteus group. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 25:703–714
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmidt W. C., Jeffries C. D. 1974; Bacteriophage typing of Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris and Proteus morganii. Applied Microbiology 27:47–53
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Senior B. W. 1977a; Typing of Proteus strains by proticine production and sensitivity. Journal of Medical Microbiology 10:7–17
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Senior B. W. 1977b; The Dienes Phenomenon: Identification of the determinants of compatibility. Journal of General Microbiology 102:235–244
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Senior B. W. 1979; The special affinity of particular types of Proteus mirabilis for the urinary tract. Journal of Medical Microbiology 12:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Senior B. W., Bradford N. C., Simpson D. S. 1980; The ureases of Proteus strains in relation to virulence for the urinary tract. Journal of Medical Microbiology 13:507–512
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Skirrow M. B. 1969; The Dienes (mutual inhibition) test in the investigation of Proteus infections. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2:471–477
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tracy O., Thomson E. J. 1972; An evaluation of three methods of typing organisms of the genus Proteus. Journal of Clinical Pathology 25:59–72
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Walkey F. A., Judge T. G., Thompson J., Sarkari N. B. 1967; Incidence of urinary infection in the elderly. Scottish Medical Journal 12:411–414
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-16-2-193
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-16-2-193
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error