Identification of Haemophilus Ducreyi in the Clinical Laboratory

References

1. Ajello G. W., Deacon W. E., Paul L., Walls K. W. 1956; Nutritional studies of a virulent strain of Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Bact 72:802
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cruickshank R., Duguid J. P., Marmion B. P., Swain R. H. A. 1975 Medical microbiology. , 12th. Churchill Livingstone; Edinburgh: 2380
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hammond G. W., Lian C. J., Wilt J. C., Ronald A. R. 1978a; Comparison of specimen collection and laboratory techniques for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. J. clin. Microbiol. 7:39
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hammond G. W., Lian C. J., Wilt T. C., Ronald A. R. 1978b; Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:608
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hammond G. W., Lian C. J., Wilt J. C, Albriton W. L., Ronald A. R. 1978c; Determination of the hemin requirement of Haemophilus ducreyi: evaluation of the porphyrin test and media used in the satellite growth test. J. clin. Microbiol. 7:243
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kilian M. 1974; A rapid method for the differentiation of Haemophilus strains. Acta path. microbiol. scand. sect. B 82:835
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kilian M. 1976; A taxonomie study of the genus Haemophilus with the proposal of a new species. J. gen. Microbiol. 93:9
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kovâcs N. 1956; Identification of Pseudomonas pyoeyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature, Lond. 178:703
   [Google Scholar]
9. Reymann F. 1947; A study of the growth conditions of Haemophilus ducreyi. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 24:208
   [Google Scholar]
10. Reymann F. 1949a; An investigation of the biochemical reactions of Hemophilus ducreyi. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 26:345
    [Google Scholar]
11. Reymann F. 1949b; Sensitivity of Hemophilus ducreyi to penicillin, streptomycin and sulfathiazole. Acta path, microbiol. scand. 26:309
    [Google Scholar]
12. Sottnek F. O., Biddle J. W., Kraus S. J., Weaver R. E., Stewart J. A. 1980; Isolation and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi in a clinical study. J. clin. Microbiol. 12:170
    [Google Scholar]
13. Stokes E. J., Ridgway G. L. 1980 Clinical bacteriology. , 5th. Edward Arnold; London:152
    [Google Scholar]
14. Teague O., Deibert O. 1920; The value of the cultural method in the diagnosis of chancroid. J. Urol. 4:543
    [Google Scholar]