Biochemical Typing of Urinary Strains by Means of the Api 20 E Enterobacteriaceae System Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

With the API 20 E Enterobacteriaceae system of biochemical testing, a bio type, coded numerically, was determined for each of 574 strains of isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. The serotypes of the strains were also determined.

Fifty-five different biotypes were identified, two accounting together for 42% of the strains examined and seven others each accounting for between 8.4 and 1.9%. There was little correlation between biotype and serotype.

Fifty pairs of strains were isolated from patients before treatment. In 43 the biotype and serotype of both strains of each pair were the same. In six pairs the biotypes, but not the serotypes, differed, the difference being limited to the results of the tests for lysine decarboxylase. The biotypes of the strains of the remaining pair differed widely although their serotypes were the same.

It is suggested that this method of biotyping offers a simple but accurate way of discriminating between recrudescent urinary tract infection caused by and that due to reinfection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-3-293
1977-08-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/10/3/medmicro-10-3-293.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-3-293&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bettelheim K. A., Taylor J. 1969; A study of Escherichia coli isolated from chronic urinary infection. J. med. Microbiol 2:225
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brumfitt W., Reeves D. S. 1969; Recent developments in the treatment of urinary tract infections. J. infect. Dis 120:61
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowan S. T., Steel K. J. 1974; Manual for the identification of medical bacteria. 2nd ed London:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies B. I., Mummery R. V., Brumfitt W. 1975; Ampicillin, carbenicillin indanyl ester, and nifuratel in the treatment of urinary infection in domiciliary practice. Br. J. Urol 47:335
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dootson P. H., Maclaren D. M., Titcombe D. H. M. 1973; The distribution of urinary O-groups of Escherichia coli in urinary infections and in the normal faecal flora. In Urinary tract infection edited by Brumfitt W., Asscher A. W. London: p 139
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ganguli L. 1970; Serological grouping of Escherichia coli in bacteriuria in pregnancy. J. med. Microbiol 3:201
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gruneberg R. N., Bettelheim K. A. 1969; Geographical variation in serological types of urinary Escherichia coli. J. med. Microbiol 2:219
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gruneberg R. N., Leigh D. A., Brumfitt W. 1968; Escherichia coli serotypes in urinary tract infection: studies in domiciliary, ante-natal and hospital practice.. In Urinary tract infection edited by ’Grady F. O, Brumfitt W. London: p 68
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hettiaratchy I. G. T., Cooke E. M., Shooter R. A. 1973; Colicine production as an epidemiological marker of Escherichia coli. J. med. Microbiol 6:1
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kunin C. M., Deutscher R., Paquin A. 1964; Urinary tract infections in school children: an epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory study. Medicine, Baltimore 43:91
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Leigh D. A., Williams J. D. 1964; Method for the detection of significant bacteriuria in large groups of patients. J. clin. Path 17:489
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McGeachie J. 1965; Serological grouping of urinary Escherichia coli. J. clin. Path 18:428
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rantz L. A. 1962; Serological grouping of Escherichia coli. Study in urinary tract infection. Archs intern. Med 109:37
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Willis G., Cook I. J. Y. 1975; Enterobacteriaceae identification: a comparative study of API, Encise and conventional methods. The med. Technologist, 5 No. 1 4
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-3-293
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-3-293
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed