The Culture of Clinical Specimens for Anaerobic Bacteria: A Comparison Of Three Regimens Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

Three procedures for the anaerobic culture of clinical specimens are compared: (i) a conventional bench routine, (ii) a system whereby primary anaerobic plates were incubated for 48 h before examination, and (iii) an anaerobic chamber.

It was shown that the anaerobic chamber was of no advantage over bench regimens when primary anaerobic plates were incubated for 48 h before being examined.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-2-195
1977-05-01
2024-03-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/10/2/medmicro-10-2-195.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-2-195&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aranki A., Syed S. A., Kenney E. B., Freter R. 1969; Isolation of anaerobic bacteria from human gingiva and mouse caecum by means of a simplified glove box procedure. Appl. Microbiol 17:568
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldwin A. W. F. 1975; An improved catalyst sachet for anaerobic jars. Med. Lab. Technol 32:329
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cary S. G., Blair E. B. 1964; New transport medium for the shipment of clinical specimens. I. Fecal specimens. J. Bad 88:96
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowan S. T. 1974; Cowan and Steele’s Manual for the identification of medical bacteria. 2nd ed London:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Drasar B. S. 1967; Cultivation of anaerobic intestinal bacteria. J. Path. Bad 94:417
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C. 1972; Anaerobe Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed Blacksburg, Virginia:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Killigore G. E., Starr S. E., Del Bene V. E., Whaley D. N., Dowell V. R. Jr 1973; Comparison of three anaerobic systems for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Am. J. clin. Path 59:552
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McMinn M. T., Crawford J. J. 1970; Recovery of anaerobic microorganisms from clinical specimens in prereduced media versus recovery by routine clinical laboratory methods. Appl. Microbiol 19:207
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Peach S., Hayek L. 1974; The isolation of anaerobic bacteria from wound swabs. J. clin. Path 27:578
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenblatt J. E., Fallon A., Finegold S. M. 1973; Comparison of methods for isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Appl. Microbiol 25:77
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Spaulding E. H., Vargo V., Michaelson T. C., Swenson R. M. 1974; A comparison of two procedures for isolating anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. In Anaerobic bacteria: role in disease edited by Balows A., DeHaan R. M., Dowell V. R., Guze L. B. Springfield, Illinois: p 37
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Spears R., Freter R. 1967; Improved isolation of anaerobic bacteria from the mouse caecum by maintaining continuous strict anaerobiosis. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med 124:903
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sutter V. L., Vargo V., Finegold S. M. 1975; Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual. 2nd ed Department of Continuing Education in Health Sciences, University Extension Los Angeles:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vargo V., Michaelson T. C., Spaulding E. H., Vitagllano R., Swenson R. M., Forsch E. 1971; Comparison of pre-reduced anaerobic methods and Gas-Pak for isolating anaerobic bacteria. Bad. Proc p 109
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Watt B., Collee J. G. 1974; Practical approaches to the isolation and identification of clinically important non-sporing anaerobes. In Infection with non-sporing anaerobic bacteria edited by Phillips I., Sussman. London: p 7
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Watt B., Collee J. G., Brown R. 1974; The isolation of strict anaerobes: the use of an anaerobic cabinet compared with a conventional procedure. J. med. Microbiol 7:315
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wren M. W. D., Baldwin A. W. F., Eldon C. P., Sanderson P. J. 1977; The anaerobic culture of clinical specimens: a 14 month study. J. med. Microbiol 10:49
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-2-195
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-10-2-195
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed