- Volume 92, Issue 8, 2011
Volume 92, Issue 8, 2011
- Animal
-
- DNA viruses
-
-
Evidence for reduced selection pressure on the hepatitis B virus core gene in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B
The mechanisms underlying the high levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication that cause hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (e−CHB) are unknown. Impaired anti-HBV immunity, which may be measurable as a relaxation of selection pressure on the virus, is possible. A group of Tongans (n = 345) with a chronic HBV infection, including seven with e−CHB, were genotyped at HLA class I. The repertoire of HBV core-gene codons under positive selection pressure was defined by phylogenetic analysis (by using the paml program) of 708 cloned sequences extracted from the 67 of these 345 subjects with the same repertoire of HLA class I alleles as the seven e−CHB individuals and matched controls (see below). The frequency of non-synonymous mutations at these codons was measured in longitudinal data from 15 subjects. Finally, the number of non-synonymous mutations at these codons was compared in seven groups comprised of one subject with e−CHB and 1–3 HLA class I-matched controls with an inactive, HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (e−InD). Nineteen codons in the core gene were under positive selection pressure. There was a high frequency of new non-synonymous mutations at these codons (P<0.0001) in longitudinal data. The mean number of these 19 codons with non-synonymous mutations was lower (P = 0.02) in HBV from subjects with e−CHB (4.4±0.5 codons per subject) versus those with e−InD (6.4±0.4 codons per subject). There is a subtle relaxation in selection pressure on the HBV core gene in e−CHB. This may be due to impaired antiviral immunity, and could contribute to the high levels of viral replication that cause liver inflammation in this disease.
-
-
-
A conserved arginine residue in the terminal protein domain of hepatitis B virus polymerase is critical for RNA pre-genome encapsidation
More LessHepadnaviruses, including human hepatitis B virus (HBV) and duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV), replicate their DNA genome through reverse transcription. Although hepadnaviral polymerase (Pol) is distantly related to retroviral reverse transcriptases, some of its features are distinct. In particular, in addition to the reverse transcriptase and RNase H domains, which are commonly encoded by retroviral reverse transcriptases, the N-terminally extended terminal protein (TP) domain confers unique features such as protein-priming capability. Importantly, the TP domain is also essential for encapsidation of the viral RNA pre-genome. To gain further insight into the TP domain, this study used clustered charged residue-to-alanine mutagenesis of HBV Pol. Of the 20 charged residues examined, only one arginine (R105) was critical for RNA encapsidation. This result contrasts with previous findings for DHBV Pol regarding the critical residue of the TP domain required for RNA binding. Firstly, R128 of DHBV Pol, which corresponds to R105 of HBV Pol, was reportedly tolerable to alanine substitution for RNA binding. Secondly, the C-terminal arginine residue of the DHBV Pol TP domain (R183) was shown to be critical for RNA binding, whereas alanine substitution of the corresponding arginine residue of the HBV Pol TP domain (R160) remained able to support RNA encapsidation. Together, these data highlight the divergence between avian and mammalian hepadnaviral Pols with respect to an arginine residue critical for RNA encapsidation.
-
-
-
First detection and analysis of a fish circovirus
More LessCircoviruses are present worldwide in birds and pigs but their occurrence in fish has not yet been reported. Recently, increased mortality was observed in barbel fry (Barbus barbus) in Hungary. This paper reports the detection of previously unknown circular viral DNA genomes in barbels by the use of a circovirus-specific wide-range nested PCR. The analysis of two complete genomes (Barbel circovirus, BaCV1 and BaCV2) indicated that they belonged into a new genetic group within the family Circoviridae, distinct from known circoviruses and circovirus-like genomes. Their genome size was 1957 bases and contained two major ORFs similar to the capsid and replication-associated protein genes of circoviruses. A connection between the presence of the virus and clinical manifestations of the infection could not be proved.
-
- Plant
-
-
-
Cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNAs that induce similar symptoms in melon plants show large differences in fitness
More LessTwo groups of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) satellite RNAs (satRNAs), necrogenic and non-necrogenic, can be differentiated according to the symptoms they cause in tomato plants, a host in which they also differ in fitness. In most other CMV hosts these CMV-satRNA cause similar symptoms. Here, we analyse whether they differ in traits determining their relative fitness in melon plants, in which the two groups of CMV-satRNAs cause similar symptoms. For this, ten necrogenic and ten non-necrogenic field satRNA genotypes were assayed with Fny-CMV as a helper virus. Neither type of CMV-satRNA modified Fny-CMV symptoms, and both types increased Fny-CMV virulence similarly, as measured by decreases in plant biomass and lifespan. Necrogenic and non-necrogenic satRNAs differed in their ability to multiply in melon tissues; necrogenic satRNAs accumulated to higher levels both in single infection and in competition with non-necrogenic satRNAs. Indeed, multiplication of some non-necrogenic satRNAs was undetectable. Transmission between hosts by aphids was less efficient for necrogenic satRNAs as a consequence of a more severe reduction of CMV accumulation in leaves. The effect of CMV accumulation on aphid transmission was not compensated for by differences in satRNA encapsidation efficiency or transmissibility to CMV progeny. Thus, necrogenic and non-necrogenic satRNAs differ in their relative fitness in melon, and trade-offs are apparent between the within-host and between-host components of satRNA fitness. Hence, CMV-satRNAs could have different evolutionary dynamics in CMV host-plant species in which they do not differ in pathogenicity.
-
-
-
-
Recombination in natural populations of watermelon mosaic virus: new agronomic threat or damp squib?
More LessSince their introduction in south-eastern France around 1999, new, ‘emerging’ (EM) strains of watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) coexist with the ‘classic’ (CL) strains present for more than 40 years. This situation constitutes a unique opportunity to estimate the frequency of recombinants appearing in the few years following introduction of new strains of a plant RNA virus. Molecular analyses performed on more than 1000 isolates from epidemiological surveys (2004–2008) and from experimental plots (2009–2010), and targeting only recombinants that became predominant in at least one plant, revealed at least seven independent CL/EM or EM/EM recombination events. The frequency of recombinants involving at least one EM parent in the natural populations tested was on the order of 1 %. No new recombinant was detected for more than 1 year, and none but one in more than one location. In tests comparing host range and aphid transmissibility, the new recombinants did not display a better fitness than their ‘parental’ isolates. No recombinant was detected from artificial mixed infections of CL and EM isolates of various hosts after testing more than 1500 subcultures obtained after single-aphid transmission. These results constitute one of the first estimations of the frequency of recombinants in natural conditions for a plant RNA virus. This suggests that although viable recombinants of WMV are not rare, and although recombination may potentially lead to new highly damaging strains, the new recombinants observed so far had a lower fitness than the parental strains and did not emerge durably in the populations.
-
- Fungal
-
-
-
Rearrangements of mycoreovirus 1 S1, S2 and S3 induced by the multifunctional protein p29 encoded by the prototypic hypovirus Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 strain EP713
More LessMycoreovirus 1 (MyRV1), a member of the family Reoviridae possessing a genome consisting of 11 dsRNA segments (S1–S11), infects the chestnut blight fungus and reduces its virulence (hypovirulence). Studies have previously demonstrated reproducible induction of intragenic rearrangements of MyRV1 S6 (S6L: almost full-length duplication) and S10 (S10ss: internal deletion of three-quarters of the ORF), mediated by the multifunctional protein p29 encoded by the prototype hypovirus, Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1) strain EP713, of the family Hypoviridae with ssRNA genomes. The current study showed that CHV1 p29 also induced rearrangements of the three largest MyRV1 segments, S1, S2 and S3, which encode structural proteins. These rearranged segments involved in-frame extensions of almost two-thirds of the ORFs (S1L, S2L and S3L, respectively), which is rare for a reovirus rearrangement. MyRV1 variants carrying S1L, S2L or S3L always contained S10ss (MyRV1/S1L+S10ss2, MyRV1/S2L+S10ss2 or MyRV1/S3L+S10ss2). Levels of mRNAs for the rearranged and co-existing unaltered genome segments in fungal colonies infected with each of the MyRV1 variants appeared to be comparable to those for the corresponding normal segments in wild-type MyRV1-infected colonies, suggesting that the rearranged segments were fully competent for packaging and transcription. Protein products of the rearranged segments were detectable in fungal colonies infected with S2L MyRV1/S2L+S10ss2 and S3L MyRV1/S3L+S10ss2, whilst S1L-encoded protein remained undetectable. S1L, S2L and S3L were associated with enhancement of the aerial hyphae growth rate. This study has provided additional examples of MyRV1 intragenic rearrangements induced by p29, and suggests that normal S1, S2 and S3 are required for the symptoms caused by MyRV1.
-
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 105 (2024)
-
Volume 104 (2023)
-
Volume 103 (2022)
-
Volume 102 (2021)
-
Volume 101 (2020)
-
Volume 100 (2019)
-
Volume 99 (2018)
-
Volume 98 (2017)
-
Volume 97 (2016)
-
Volume 96 (2015)
-
Volume 95 (2014)
-
Volume 94 (2013)
-
Volume 93 (2012)
-
Volume 92 (2011)
-
Volume 91 (2010)
-
Volume 90 (2009)
-
Volume 89 (2008)
-
Volume 88 (2007)
-
Volume 87 (2006)
-
Volume 86 (2005)
-
Volume 85 (2004)
-
Volume 84 (2003)
-
Volume 83 (2002)
-
Volume 82 (2001)
-
Volume 81 (2000)
-
Volume 80 (1999)
-
Volume 79 (1998)
-
Volume 78 (1997)
-
Volume 77 (1996)
-
Volume 76 (1995)
-
Volume 75 (1994)
-
Volume 74 (1993)
-
Volume 73 (1992)
-
Volume 72 (1991)
-
Volume 71 (1990)
-
Volume 70 (1989)
-
Volume 69 (1988)
-
Volume 68 (1987)
-
Volume 67 (1986)
-
Volume 66 (1985)
-
Volume 65 (1984)
-
Volume 64 (1983)
-
Volume 63 (1982)
-
Volume 62 (1982)
-
Volume 61 (1982)
-
Volume 60 (1982)
-
Volume 59 (1982)
-
Volume 58 (1982)
-
Volume 57 (1981)
-
Volume 56 (1981)
-
Volume 55 (1981)
-
Volume 54 (1981)
-
Volume 53 (1981)
-
Volume 52 (1981)
-
Volume 51 (1980)
-
Volume 50 (1980)
-
Volume 49 (1980)
-
Volume 48 (1980)
-
Volume 47 (1980)
-
Volume 46 (1980)
-
Volume 45 (1979)
-
Volume 44 (1979)
-
Volume 43 (1979)
-
Volume 42 (1979)
-
Volume 41 (1978)
-
Volume 40 (1978)
-
Volume 39 (1978)
-
Volume 38 (1978)
-
Volume 37 (1977)
-
Volume 36 (1977)
-
Volume 35 (1977)
-
Volume 34 (1977)
-
Volume 33 (1976)
-
Volume 32 (1976)
-
Volume 31 (1976)
-
Volume 30 (1976)
-
Volume 29 (1975)
-
Volume 28 (1975)
-
Volume 27 (1975)
-
Volume 26 (1975)
-
Volume 25 (1974)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1974)
-
Volume 22 (1974)
-
Volume 21 (1973)
-
Volume 20 (1973)
-
Volume 19 (1973)
-
Volume 18 (1973)
-
Volume 17 (1972)
-
Volume 16 (1972)
-
Volume 15 (1972)
-
Volume 14 (1972)
-
Volume 13 (1971)
-
Volume 12 (1971)
-
Volume 11 (1971)
-
Volume 10 (1971)
-
Volume 9 (1970)
-
Volume 8 (1970)
-
Volume 7 (1970)
-
Volume 6 (1970)
-
Volume 5 (1969)
-
Volume 4 (1969)
-
Volume 3 (1968)
-
Volume 2 (1968)
-
Volume 1 (1967)