The 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of turnip crinkle virus (TCV) RNA is 253 nt long (nt 3798–4050) with a 27 nt hairpin structure near its 3′ terminus. In this study, the roles of the 3′ UTR in virus accumulation were investigated in protoplasts of Hibiscus cannabinus L. and Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Our results showed that, in Hibiscus protoplasts, the minimal 3′ UTR essential for TCV accumulation extends from nt 3922 to 4050, but that maintenance of virus accumulation at wild-type (wt) levels requires the full-length 3′ UTR. However, in Arabidopsis protoplasts, only 33 nt (nt 4018–4050) at the 3′ extremity of the UTR is required for wt levels of accumulation, whereas other parts of the 3′ UTR are dispensable. The 27 nt hairpin within the 33 nt region is essential for virus accumulation in both Hibiscus and Arabidopsis protoplasts. However, transposition of nucleotides in base pairs within the upper or lower stems has no effect on virus accumulation in either Hibiscus or Arabidopsis protoplasts, and alterations of the loop sequence also fail to affect replication. Disruption of the upper or lower stems and deletion of the loop sequence reduce viral accumulation in Arabidopsis protoplasts, but abolish virus accumulation in Hibiscus protoplasts completely. These results indicate that strict conservation of the hairpin structure is more important for replication in Hibiscus than in Arabidopsis protoplasts. In conclusion, both the 3′ UTR primary sequence and the 3′-terminal hairpin structure influence TCV accumulation in a host-dependent manner.
BattenJ. S.,
DesvoyesB.,
YamamuraY.,
ScholthofK.-B. G.2006; A translational enhancer element on the 3′-proximal end of the Panicum mosaic virus genome. FEBS Lett 580:2591–2597[CrossRef]
BrownD. M.,
KauderS. E.,
CornellC. T.,
JangG. M.,
RacanielloV. R.,
SemlerB. L.2004; Cell-dependent role for the poliovirus 3′ noncoding region in positive-strand RNA synthesis. J Virol 78:1344–1351[CrossRef]
CarpenterC. D.,
SimonA. E.1998; Analysis of sequences and predicted structures required for viral satellite RNA accumulation by in vivo genetic selection. Nucleic Acids Res 26:2426–2432[CrossRef]
ChapmanM. R.,
KaoC. C.1999; A minimal RNA promoter for minus-strand RNA synthesis by the brome mosaic virus polymerase complex. J Mol Biol 286:709–720[CrossRef]
ChenI.-H.,
MengM. H.,
HsuY. H.,
TsaiC. H.2003; Functional analysis of the cloverleaf-like structure in the 3′ untranslated region of bamboo mosaic potexvirus RNA revealed dual roles in viral RNA replication and long distance movement. Virology 315:415–424[CrossRef]
ChengJ. H.,
PengC. W.,
HsuY. H.,
TsaiC. H.2002; The synthesis of minus-strand RNA of bamboo mosaic potexvirus initiates from multiple sites within the poly(A) tail. J Virol 76:6114–6120[CrossRef]
DreherT. W.,
HallT. C.1988; Mutational analysis of the sequence and structural requirements in brome mosaic virus RNA for minus strand promoter activity. J Mol Biol 201:31–40[CrossRef]
DreherT. W.,
RaoA. L.,
HallT. C.1989; Replication in vivo of mutant brome mosaic virus RNAs defective in aminoacylation. J Mol Biol 206:425–438[CrossRef]
FayzulinR.,
FrolovI.2004; Changes of the secondary structure of the 5′ end of the Sindbis virus genome inhibit virus growth in mosquito cells and lead to accumulation of adaptive mutations. J Virol 78:4953–4964[CrossRef]
GallieD. R.,
KobayashiM.1994; The role of the 3′-untranslated region of non-polyadenylated plant viral mRNAs in regulating translational efficiency. Gene 142:159–165[CrossRef]
GallieD. R.,
WalbotV.1990; RNA pseudoknot domain of tobacco mosaic virus can functionally substitute for a poly(A) tail in plant and animal cells. Genes Dev 4:1149–1157[CrossRef]
GuoL.,
AllenA. M.,
MillerW. A.2001; Base-pairing between untranslated regions facilitates translation of uncapped, nonpolyadenylated viral RNA. Mol Cell 7:1103–1109[CrossRef]
HaasnootP. C.,
OlsthoornR. C.,
BolJ. F.2002; The Brome mosaic virus subgenomic promoter hairpin is structurally similar to the iron-responsive element and functionally equivalent to the minus-strand core promoter stem-loop C. RNA 8:110–122[CrossRef]
HardyR. W.,
RiceC. M.2005; Requirements at the 3′ end of the sindbis virus genome for efficient synthesis of minus-strand RNA. J Virol 79:4630–4639[CrossRef]
HoldenK. L.,
HarrisE.2004; Enhancement of dengue virus translation: role of the 3′ untranslated region and the terminal 3′ stem-loop domain. Virology 329:119–133[CrossRef]
KohD. C.-Y.,
LiuD. X.,
WongS.-M.2002; A six-nucleotide segment within the 3′ untranslated region of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus plays an essential role in translational enhancement. J Virol 76:1144–1153[CrossRef]
KohD. C.,
WongS. M.,
LiuD. X.2003; Synergism of the 3′-untranslated region and an internal ribosome entry site differentially enhances the translation of a plant virus coat protein. J Biol Chem 278:20565–20573[CrossRef]
KushnerD. B.,
LindenbachB. D.,
GrdzelishviliV. Z.,
NoueiryA. O.,
PaulS. M.,
AhlquistP.2003; Systematic, genome-wide identification of host genes affecting replication of a positive-strand RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:15764–15769[CrossRef]
LaiM. M.1998; Cellular factors in the transcription and replication of viral RNA genomes: a parallel to DNA-dependent RNA transcription. Virology 244:1–12[CrossRef]
LiW.,
WongS. M.2006; Analyses of subgenomic promoters of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus and demonstration of 5′ untranslated region and 3′-terminal sequences functioning as subgenomic promoters. J Virol 80:3395–3405[CrossRef]
LiangX.,
DingS.,
WongS.2002; Development of a kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus L.) protoplast system for replication study of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus. Plant Cell Rep 20:982–986[CrossRef]
LinY. J.,
LiaoC. L.,
LaiM. M.1994; Identification of the cis-acting signal for minus-strand RNA synthesis of a murine coronavirus: implications for the role of minus-strand RNA in RNA replication and transcription. J Virol 68:8131–8140
OlsthoornR. C.,
HaasnootP. C.,
BolJ. F.2004; Similarities and differences between the subgenomic and minus-strand promoters of an RNA plant virus. J Virol 78:4048–4053[CrossRef]
PanavieneZ.,
PanavasT.,
ServaS.,
NagyP. D.2004; Purification of the cucumber necrosis virus replicase from yeast cells: role of coexpressed viral RNA in stimulation of replicase activity. J Virol 78:8254–8263[CrossRef]
PanavieneZ.,
PanavasT.,
NagyP. D.2005; Role of an internal and two 3′-terminal RNA elements in assembly of tombusvirus replicase. J Virol 79:10608–10618[CrossRef]
ProutskiV.,
GritsunT. S.,
GouldE. A.,
HolmesE. C.1999; Biological consequences of deletions within the 3′-untranslated region of flaviviruses may be due to rearrangements of RNA secondary structure. Virus Res 64:107–123[CrossRef]
QiY.,
DingB.2002; Replication of potato spindle tuber viroid in cultured cells of tobacco and Nicotiana benthamiana : the role of specific nucleotides in determining replication levels for host adaptation. Virology 302:445–456[CrossRef]
QuadtR.,
IshikawaM.,
JandaM.,
AhlquistP.1995; Formation of brome mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase in yeast requires coexpression of viral proteins and viral RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:4892–4896[CrossRef]
RaoA. L.,
DreherT. W.,
MarshL. E.,
HallT.1989; Telomeric function of the tRNA-like structure of brome mosaic virus RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:5335–5359[CrossRef]
ScholthofH. B.,
JacksonA. O.1997; The enigma of pX: a host-dependent cis-acting element with variable effects on tombusvirus RNA accumulation. Virology 237:56–65[CrossRef]
ServaS.,
NagyP. D.2006; Proteomics analysis of the tombusvirus replicase: Hsp70 molecular chaperone is associated with the replicase and enhances viral RNA replication. J Virol 80:2162–2169[CrossRef]
SimonA. E.1999; Replication, recombination, and symptom-modulation properties of the satellite RNAs of turnip crinkle virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 239:19–36
SivakumaranK.,
ChoiS. K.,
HemaM.,
KaoC. C.2004; Requirements for brome mosaic virus subgenomic RNA synthesis in vivo and replicase-core promoter interactions in vitro. J Virol 78:6091–6101[CrossRef]
SleatD. E.,
PalukaitisP.1992; A single nucleotide change within a plant virus satellite RNA alters the host specificity of disease induction. Plant J 2:43–49
SongC.,
SimonA. E.1995; Requirement of a 3′-terminal stem-loop in in vitro transcription by an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol 254:6–14[CrossRef]
StupinaV.,
SimonA. E.1997; Analysis in vivo of turnip crinkle virus satellite RNA C variants with mutations in the 3′-terminal minus-strand promoter. Virology 238:470–477[CrossRef]
van RossumC. M. A.,
ReuskenC. B. E. M.,
BrederodeF. Th.,
BolJ. F.1997; The 3′ untranslated region of alfalfa mosaic virus RNA3 contains a core promoter for minus-strand RNA synthesis and an enhancer element. J Gen Virol 78:3045–3049
WangH.-H.,
WongS.-M.2004; Significance of the 3′ terminal region in minus-strand RNA synthesis of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus
. J Gen Virol 85:1763–1776[CrossRef]
WasseneggerM.,
SpiekerR. L.,
ThalmeirS.,
GastF. U.,
RiedelL.,
SangerH. L.1996; A single nucleotide substitution converts potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd) from a noninfectious to an infectious RNA for Nicotiana tabacum
. Virology 226:191–197[CrossRef]
YuL.,
MarkoffL.2005; The topology of bulges in the long stem of the flavivirus 3′ stem-loop is a major determinant of RNA replication competence. J Virol 79:2309–2324[CrossRef]
ZhangG.,
ZhangJ. C.,
SimonA. E.2004; Repression and derepression of minus-strand synthesis in a plus-strand RNA virus replicon. J Virol 78:7619–7633[CrossRef]