Low-pathogenicity avian influenza virus (LPAIV) can lead to epizootics that cause economic losses in poultry or the emergence of human-infectious strains. LPAIVs experience a complex immunity landscape as they are endemic in numerous host species, and many antigenically distinct strains co-circulate. Prevention and control of emergence of detrimental strains requires an understanding of infection/transmission characteristics of the various subtypes in different hosts, including interactions between subtypes. In order to develop analytical frameworks for examining control efficacy, quantification of heterosubtypic immunity interactions is fundamental. However, these data are scarce, especially for wild avian subtypes in natural hosts. Consequently, in this study, three host species (mallards, quail and pheasants) were infected with two LPAIV subtypes isolated from wild birds: H3N8 and H4N6. The recovered hosts were also reinfected with the alternate subtype to measure the effects of heterosubtypic immunity. Oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected and viral RNA load was quantified by real-time RT-PCR. For secondary infections in recovered hosts, peak viral load was up to four orders of magnitude lower and shedding length was up to 4 days shorter. However, both the magnitude and presence of heterosubtypic immunity varied across specific host species/subtype combinations. Using a mathematical model of virus replication, the variation in virus replication dynamics due to host individuals was quantified. It was found that accounting for individual heterogeneity is important for drawing accurate conclusions about treatment effects. These results are relevant for developing epidemiological models to inform control practices and for analysing virus replication data.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
AgüeroM.,
San MiguelE.,
SánchezA.,
Gómez-TejedorC.,
Jiménez-ClaveroM. A.2007; A fully automated procedure for the high-throughput detection of avian influenza virus by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Avian Dis 51:Suppl.235–241 [View Article][PubMed]
CampitelliL.,
FabianiC.,
PuzelliS.,
FiorettiA.,
FoniE.,
De MarcoA.,
KraussS.,
WebsterR. G.,
DonatelliI.2002; H3N2 influenza viruses from domestic chickens in Italy: an increasing role for chickens in the ecology of influenza?. J Gen Virol 83:413–420
CostaT. P.,
BrownJ. D.,
HowerthE. W.,
StallknechtD. E.2010a; Effect of a prior exposure to a low pathogenic avian influenza virus in the outcome of a heterosubtypic low pathogenic avian influenza infection in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Avian Dis 54:1286–1291 [View Article][PubMed]
CostaT. P.,
BrownJ. D.,
HowerthE. W.,
StallknechtD. E.2010b; The effect of age on avian influenza viral shedding in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Avian Dis 54:Suppl.581–585 [View Article][PubMed]
DaoustP. Y.,
KibengeF. S. B.,
FouchierR. A. M.,
van de BildtM. W. G.,
van RielD.,
KuikenT.2010; Replication of low pathogenic avian influenza virus in naturally infected mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) causes no morphologic lesions. J Wildl Dis 47:401–409[CrossRef]
DelibertoT. J.,
SwaffordS. R.,
NolteD. L.,
PedersenK.,
LutmanM. W.,
SchmitB. B.,
BarochJ. A.,
KohlerD. J.,
FranklinA.2009; Surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza in wild birds in the USA. Integr Zool 4:426–439 [View Article][PubMed]
ImaiK.,
NakamuraK.,
MaseM.,
TsukamotoK.,
ImadaT.,
YamaguchiS.2007; Partial protection against challenge with the highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus isolated in Japan in chickens infected with the H9N2 influenza virus. Arch Virol 152:1395–1400 [View Article][PubMed]
JindalN.,
de AbinM.,
PrimusA. E.,
RajuS.,
ChanderY.,
RedigP. T.,
GoyalS. M.2010; Comparison of cloacal and oropharyngeal samples for the detection of avian influenza virus in wild birds. Avian Dis 54:115–119 [View Article][PubMed]
Lloyd-SmithJ. O.,
SchreiberS. J.,
KoppP. E.,
GetzW. M.2005; Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438:355–359 [View Article][PubMed]
NoltingJ.,
FriesA. C.,
SlemonsR. D.,
CourtneyC.,
HinesN.,
PedersenJ.2012; Recovery of H14 influenza A virus isolates from sea ducks in the Western Hemisphere. PLoS Curr 4:RRN1290 [View Article][PubMed]
PanigrahyB.,
SenneD. A.,
PedersenJ. C.2002; Avian influenza virus subtypes inside and outside the live bird markets, 1993–2000: a spatial and temporal relationship. Avian Dis 46:298–307 [View Article][PubMed]
PaullS. H.,
SongS.,
McClureK. M.,
SackettL. C.,
KilpatrickA. M.,
JohnsonP. T. J.2012; From superspreaders to disease hotspots: linking transmission across hosts and space. Front Ecol Environ 10:75–82 [View Article]
PepinK. M.,
WangJ.,
WebbC. T.,
SmithG. J. D.,
PossM.,
HudsonP. J.,
HongW.,
ZhuH.,
RileyS.,
GuanY.2012; Multiannual patterns of influenza A transmission in Chinese live-bird market systems. Influenza Other Resp (in press) [View Article]
PiaggioA. J.,
ShrinerS. A.,
VanDalenK. K.,
FranklinA. B.,
AndersonT. D.,
KolokotronisS.-O.2012; Molecular surveillance of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses in wild birds across the United States: inferences from the hemagglutinin gene. PLoS ONE (in press)
VanDalenK. K.,
AndersonT. D.,
KillianM. L.,
PedersenJ. C.,
FranklinA. B.,
PiaggioA. J.2008; Increased detection of influenza A H16 in the United States. Arch Virol 153:1981–1983 [View Article][PubMed]
VanDalenK. K.,
FranklinA. B.,
MooersN. L.,
SullivanH. J.,
ShrinerS. A.2010; Shedding light on avian influenza H4N6 infection in mallards: modes of transmission and implications for surveillance. PLoS ONE 5:e12851 [View Article][PubMed]