1887

Abstract

Yep-phi, a lytic phage of , was isolated in China and is routinely used as a diagnostic phage for the identification of the plague pathogen. Yep-phi has an isometric hexagonal head containing dsDNA and a short non-contractile conical tail. In this study, we sequenced the Yep-phi genome (GenBank accession no. HQ333270) and performed proteomics analysis. The genome consists of 38 616 bp of DNA, including direct terminal repeats of 222 bp, and is predicted to contain 45 ORFs. Most structural proteins were identified by proteomics analysis. Compared with the three available genome sequences of lytic phages for , the phages could be divided into two subgroups. Yep-phi displays marked homology to the bacteriophages Berlin (GenBank accession no. AM183667) and Yepe2 (GenBank accession no. EU734170), and these comprise one subgroup. The other subgroup is represented by bacteriophage ΦA1122 (GenBank accession no. AY247822). Potential recombination was detected among the Yep-phi subgroup.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.026328-0
2011-01-01
2019-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/92/1/216.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.026328-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Boni, M. F., Posada, D. & Feldman, M. W. ( 2007; ). An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 176, 1035–1047.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Garcia, E., Elliott, J. M., Ramanculov, E., Chain, P. S., Chu, M. C. & Molineux, I. J. ( 2003; ). The genome sequence of Yersinia pestis bacteriophage phiA1122 reveals an intimate history with the coliphage T3 and T7 genomes. J Bacteriol 185, 5248–5262.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Garcia, E., Chain, P., Elliott, J. M., Bobrov, A. G., Motin, V. L., Kirillina, O., Lao, V., Calendar, R. & Filippov, A. A. ( 2008; ). Molecular characterization of L-413C, a P2-related plague diagnostic bacteriophage. Virology 372, 85–96.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibbs, M. J., Armstrong, J. S. & Gibbs, A. J. ( 2000; ). Sister-scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 16, 573–582.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Labrie, S. J., Samson, J. E. & Moineau, S. ( 2010; ). Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8, 317–327.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindberg, A. A. ( 1973; ). Bacteriophage receptors. Annu Rev Microbiol 27, 205–241.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin, D. & Rybicki, E. ( 2000; ). RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 16, 562–563.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Martin, D. P., Williamson, C. & Posada, D. ( 2005; ). RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 21, 260–262.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Padidam, M., Sawyer, S. & Fauquet, C. M. ( 1999; ). Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 265, 218–225.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith, J. M. ( 1992; ). Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol 34, 126–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Varsani, A., van der Walt, E., Heath, L., Rybicki, E. P., Williamson, A. L. & Martin, D. P. ( 2006; ). Evidence of ancient papillomavirus recombination. J Gen Virol 87, 2527–2531.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WHO ( 2004; ). Human plague in 2002 and 2003. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 79, 301–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhou, D., Han, Y. & Yang, R. ( 2006; ). Molecular and physiological insights into plague transmission, virulence and etiology. Microbes Infect 8, 273–284.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.026328-0
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.026328-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

vol. , part 1, pp. 216 - 221

Phylogenetic Tree created by clustal w

Similarity comparison between the genome sequences of the four phages [Single PDF file](233 KB)



PDF

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error