Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) is a highly destructive plant pathogen transmitted by thrips, including , in a circulative and propagative manner. To counter viral infections, thrips activate antiviral defences through C20 oxygenated polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), known as eicosanoids. However, at later stages of infection, C18 PUFAs, including epoxyoctadecamonoenoic acids (EpOMEs), modulate immune responses by preventing excessive and unnecessary activation. Our previous study demonstrated that TSWV elevates EpOME levels in thrips to suppress antiviral responses and enhance viral replication, with its nonstructural protein S (NSs) playing a key role in this process. In this study, we investigated the impact of NSs protein variation on vector immunity and virus–vector interactions. We assessed relative TSWV titres in thrips larvae and examined the role of eicosanoids, specifically 12,13-EpOME and PGE, in regulating viral load and apoptosis. Our results revealed that 12,13-EpOME significantly increased viral titres, whereas PGE reduced the viral accumulation by promoting apoptosis in the vector insect. Phylogenetic analysis identified distinct variations among TSWV isolates, with resistance-breaking (RB) and WT strains, which modulated differential infection patterns in thrips gut tissues, as visualized through fluorescence in situ hybridization. RB strains exhibited significantly higher viral titres, along with increased expression of EpOME biosynthetic gene () and decreasing expression of EpOME degradation gene (). Apoptosis assays using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labelling assay further indicated that RB strains suppressed the gut epithelial cell death in thrips by antagonizing a process regulated by PGE. Additionally, transient expression of the gene in a nontarget insect, , demonstrated the immunosuppressive effects by inducing EpOME level through upregulation of expression and downregulation of expression. Indeed, RB strains suppressed cellular immune responses more effectively than WT strains in . These findings provide novel insight into the role of genetic variation in TSWV transmission in the insect vector as well as in the host plants.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation (KR) (Award 2022R1A2B5B03001792)
    • Principal Award Recipient: YonggyunKim
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.002175
2025-11-07
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/106/11/jgv002175.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.002175&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adkins S, Momol MT, Dankers H, Reitz S, Olson S. First report of Tomato spotted wilt virus in Tomatillo in Florida. Plant Health Progress 2006; 7:1–3 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kuhn JH, Abe J, Adkins S, Alkhovsky SV, Avšič-Županc T et al. Annual (2023) taxonomic update of RNA-directed RNA polymerase-encoding negative-sense RNA viruses (realm Riboviria: kingdom Orthornavirae: phylum Negarnaviricota). J Gen Virol 2023; 104:001864 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kormelink R, Garcia ML, Goodin M, Sasaya T, Haenni AL. Negative-strand RNA viruses: the plant-infecting counterparts. Virus Res 2011; 162:184–202 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jahn M, Paran I, Hoffmann K, Radwanski ER, Livingstone KD et al. Genetic mapping of the Tsw locus for resistance to the Tospovirus Tomato spotted wilt virus in Capsicum spp. and its relationship to the Sw-5 gene for resistance to the same pathogen in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2000; 13:673–682 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Almási A, Nemes K, Csömör Z, Tóbiás I, Palkovics L et al. A single point mutation in Tomato spotted wilt virus NSs protein is sufficient to overcome Tsw-gene-mediated resistance in pepper. J Gen Virol 2017; 98:1521–1525 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon JY, Her NH, Cho IS, Chung BN, Choi SK. First report of a resistance-breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt orthotospovirus Infecting Capsicum annuum carrying the Tsw resistance gene in South Korea. Plant Dis 2021; 105:2259 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kwon H, Yang Y, Kumar S, Lee D-W, Bajracharya P et al. Characterization of the first insect prostaglandin (PGE2) receptor: MansePGE2R is expressed in oenocytoids and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) increases transcript expression. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2020; 117:103290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choi G-S, Kim J-S, Choi J-K, Kim J-H. Characterization of Tomato spotted wilt virus from paprika in Korea. Plant Pathol J 2004; 20:297–301 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barka GD, Lee J. Molecular marker development and gene cloning for diverse disease resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): current status and prospects. Plant Breed Biotech 2020; 8:89–113 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Macedo MA, Melgarejo T, Cespedes M, Rojas M, Lazicki P et al. An all-out assault on a dominant resistance gene: local emergence, establishment, and spread of strains of tomato spotted wilt orthotospovirus (TSWV) that overcome Sw-5b-mediated resistance in fresh market and processing tomatoes in California. PLOS ONE 2024; 19:e0305402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gautam S, Workneh F, Chinnaiah S, Rush CM, Xue Q et al. Tsw -resistant pepper cultivars offer limited protection against resistance-breaking isolates of tomato spotted wilt virus. Plant Health Progress 2025; 26:170–176 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferrand L, Almeida MMS, Orílio AF, Dal Bó E, Resende RO et al. Biological and molecular characterization of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) resistance‐breaking isolates from Argentina. Plant Pathol 2019; 68:1587–1601 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Margaria P, Ciuffo M, Pacifico D, Turina M. Evidence that the nonstructural protein of Tomato spotted wilt virus is the avirulence determinant in the interaction with resistant pepper carrying the TSW gene. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20:547–558 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. de Ronde D, Pasquier A, Ying S, Butterbach P, Lohuis D et al. Analysis of Tomato spotted wilt virus NSs protein indicates the importance of the N-terminal domain for avirulence and RNA silencing suppression. Mol Plant Pathol 2014; 15:185–195 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rotenberg D, Jacobson AL, Schneweis DJ, Whitfield AE. Thrips transmission of tospoviruses. Curr Opin Virol 2015; 15:80–89 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ziegler-Graff V. Molecular insights into host and vector manipulation by plant viruses. Viruses 2020; 12:263 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim CY, Ahmed S, Stanley D, Kim Y. HMG-like DSP1 is a damage signal to mediate the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, immune responses to tomato spotted wilt virus infection. Dev Comp Immunol 2023; 144:104706 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Medeiros RB, Resende R de O, de Avila AC. The plant virus Tomato Spotted Wilt Tospovirus activates the immune system of its main insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis. J Virol 2004; 78:4976–4982 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Scholthof K-BG, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E et al. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 2011; 12:938–954 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rotenberg D, Whitfield AE. Molecular interactions between tospoviruses and thrips vectors. Curr Opin Virol 2018; 33:191–197 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Takeda A, Sugiyama K, Nagano H, Mori M, Kaido M et al. Identification of a novel RNA silencing suppressor, NSs protein of Tomato spotted wilt virus. FEBS Lett 2002; 532:75–79 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim CY, Kim Y. In vivo transient expression of a viral silencing suppressor, NSs, derived from tomato spotted wilt virus decreases insect RNAi efficiencies. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2023; 112:e21982 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Shrestha A, Srinivasan R, Riley DG, Culbreath AK. Direct and indirect effects of a thrips-transmitted tospovirus on the preference and fitness of its vector, Frankliniella fusca. Entomol Exp Appl 2012; 145:260–271 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mandal E, Khan F, Kil EJ, Kim Y. Virus-vectoring thrips regulate the excessive multiplication of tomato spotted wilt virus using their antiviral immune responses. J Gen Virol 2024; 105:001984 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim Y, Ahmed S, Stanley D, An C. Eicosanoid-mediated immunity in insects. Dev Comp Immunol 2018; 83:130–143 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim Y, Stanley D. Eicosanoid signaling in insect immunology: new genes and unresolved issues. Genes 2021; 12:211 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Stanley D, Haas E, Kim Y. Beyond cellular immunity: on the biological significance of insect hemocytes. Cells 2023; 12:599 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hasan MA, Ahmed S, Kim Y. Biosynthetic pathway of arachidonic acid in Spodoptera exigua in response to bacterial challenge. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2019; 111:103179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vatanparast M, Ahmed S, Lee DH, Hwang SH, Hammock B et al. EpOMEs act as immune suppressors in a lepidopteran insect, Spodoptera exigua. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20183 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Vatanparast M, Lee DH, Kim Y. Biosynthesis and immunity of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids in a lepidopteran insect, Spodoptera exigua. Dev Comp Immunol 2020; 107:103643 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Shahmohammadi N, Esmaeily M, Abdisa E, Mandal E, Kim Y. Enhanced baculoviral virulence by suppressing the degradation of an insect immune resolvin, epoxyoctadecamonoenoic acid, in three lepidopteran insects. J Invertebr Pathol 2024; 204:108095 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Shahmohammadi N, Khan F, Jin G, Kwon M, Lee D et al. Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus suppresses the antiviral response of the insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis, by elevating an immunosuppressive C18 oxylipin level using its virulent factor, NSs. Cells 2024; 13:1377 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kim SG, Lee S-D, Lee W-M, Jeong H-B, Yu N et al. Effective Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus resistance assessment using non-destructive imaging and machine learning. Horticulturae 2025; 11:132 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hossain Hrithik MT, Shahmohammadi N, Jin G, Lee D-H, Singh N et al. Insect immune resolution with EpOME/DiHOME and its dysregulation by their analogs leading to pathogen hypersensitivity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2024; 168:104104 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001; 25:402–408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Park B, Kim Y. Transient transcription of a putative RNase containing BEN domain encoded in Cotesia plutellae bracovirus induces an immunosuppression of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Invertebr Pathol 2010; 105:156–163 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goh HG, Lee SG, Lee BP, Choi KM, Kim JH. Simple mass rearing of beet armyworm spodoptera exigua (hübner) (lepidoptera: noctuidae), on an artificial diet. Korean J Appl Entomol 1990; 29:180–183
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hepat R, Kim Y. In vivo transient expression for the functional analysis of polydnaviral genes. J Invertebr Pathol 2012; 111:152–159 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. SAS Institute Inc SAS/STAT User’s Guide Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ahmed S, Stanley D, Kim Y. An insect prostaglandin E2 synthase acts in immunity and reproduction. Front Physiol 2018; 9:1231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shahmohammadi N, Haraji S, Khan F, Sørskår ÅM, Danielsen PE et al. Antagonistic control of intracellular signals by EpOMEs in hemocytes induced by PGE2 and their chemical modification for a potent insecticide. PLoS ONE 2025; 20:e0320488 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu X, Xu S, Zhao P, Zhang X, Yao X et al. The orthotospovirus nonstructural protein NSs suppresses plant MYC-regulated jasmonate signaling leading to enhanced vector attraction and performance. PLoS Pathog 2019; 15:e1007897 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shi J, Zhou J, Jiang F, Li Z, Zhu S. The effects of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UBR7 of Frankliniella occidentalis on the ability of insects to acquire and transmit TSWV. PeerJ 2023; 11:e15385 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Elhamouly M, Terada T, Nii T, Isobe N, Yoshimura Y. Innate antiviral immune response against infectious bronchitis virus and involvement of prostaglandin E2 in the uterine mucosa of laying hens. Theriogenology 2018; 110:122–129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kim Y, Ahmed S, Al Baki MA, Kumar S, Kim K et al. Deletion mutant of PGE2 receptor using CRISPR-Cas9 exhibits larval immunosuppression and adult infertility in a lepidopteran insect, Spodoptera exigua. Dev Comp Immunol 2020; 111:103743 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Khan F, Tunaz H, Haas E, Kim Y, Stanley D. PGE2 binding affinity of hemocyte membrane preparations of Manduca sexta and identification of the receptor-associated G proteins in two lepidopteran species. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 2024; 117:e70005 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Li R, Zhou H, Jia C, Jin P, Ma F. Drosophila Myc restores immune homeostasis of Imd pathway via activating miR-277 to inhibit imd/Tab2. PLoS Genet 2020; 16:e1008989 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Almási A, Nemes K, Salánki K. Increasing diversity of resistance breaking pepper strains of tomato spotted wilt virus in the Mediterranean region. Phytopathol Mediterr 2020; 59:385–391
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kwon SJ, Cho YE, Kwon OH, Kang HG, Seo JK. Resistance-breaking tomato spotted wilt virus variant that recently occurred in pepper in South Korea is a genetic reassortant. Plant Dis 2021; 105:2771–2775 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Debreczeni DE, López C, Aramburu J, Darós JA, Soler S et al. Complete sequence of three different biotypes of tomato spotted wilt virus (wild type, tomato Sw-5 resistance-breaking and pepper Tsw resistance-breaking) from Spain. Arch Virol 2015; 160:2117–2123 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. de Ronde D, Butterbach P, Lohuis D, Hedil M, van Lent JWM et al. Tsw gene-based resistance is triggered by a functional RNA silencing suppressor protein of the Tomato spotted wilt virus. Mol Plant Pathol 2013; 14:405–415 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Chinnaiah S, Gautam S, Herron B, Workneh F, Rush CM et al. Novel strains of a pandemic plant virus, tomato spotted wilt orthotospovirus, increase vector fitness and modulate virus transmission in a resistant host. Front Microbiol 2023; 14: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Chinnaiah S, Arora AK, Gadhave KR. Novel strains of Tomato Spotted Wilt Orthotospovirus (TSWV) are transmitted by western flower thrips in a context-specific manner. PLOS ONE 2025; 20:e0323037 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tentchev D, Verdin E, Marchal C, Jacquet M, Aguilar JM et al. Evolution and structure of Tomato spotted wilt virus populations: evidence of extensive reassortment and insights into emergence processes. J Gen Virol 2011; 92:961–973 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kwon SJ, Cho YE, Byun HS, Kwak HR, Seo JK. A multiplex RT-PCR assay for detection of emergent pepper Tsw resistance-breaking variants of tomato spotted wilt virus in South Korea. Mol Cell Probes 2022; 61:101792 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.002175
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.002175
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error