1887

Journal of General Virology header logo

Volume 100, Issue 10

The global phylogeny o is emerging Free

Abstract

The 206 complete genomic sequences of in GenBank (January 2019) were downloaded. Their main open reading frames (ORF)s were compared by phylogenetic and population genetic methods. All fell into the nine previously recognized strain clusters; the PPV-Rec and PPV-T strain ORFs were all recombinants, whereas most of those in the PPV-C, PPV-CR, PPV-CV, PPV-D, PPV-EA, PPV-M and PPV-W strain clusters were not. The strain clusters ranged in size from 2 (PPV-CV and PPV-EA) to 74 (PPV-D). The isolates of eight of the nine strains came solely from Europe and the Levant (with an exception resulting from a quarantine breach), but many PPV-D strain isolates also came from east and south Asia and the Americas. The estimated time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of all 134 non-recombinant ORFs was 820 (865–775) BCE. Most strain populations were only a few decades old, and had small intra-strain, but large inter-strain, differences; strain PPV-W was the oldest. Eurasia is clearly the ‘centre of emergence’ of PPV and the several PPV-D strain populations found elsewhere only show evidence of gene flow with Europe, so have come from separate introductions from Europe. All ORFs and their individual genes show evidence of strong negative selection, except the positively selected gene of the recently migrant populations. The possible ancient origins of PPV are discussed.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): dating , phylogeny , phylogeography , PIPO , population genetics and Potyvirus
© 2019 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001308
2019-08-16
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/100/10/1457.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001308&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Glasa M, Candresse T. CMI/AAB description plant viruses; 2005; 410
  2. Subr Z, Glasa M. Unfolding the secrets of plum pox virus: from epidemiology to genomics. Acta Virol 2013; 57:217–228 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Rimbaud L, Dallot S, Gottwald T, Decroocq V, Jacquot E et al. Sharka epidemiology and worldwide management strategies: learning lessons to optimize disease control in perennial plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2015; 53:357–378 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Garcia JA, Glasa M, Cambra M, Candresse T. Plum pox virus and sharka: a model potyvirus and a major disease. Mol Plant Pathol 204:226–241
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Sochor J, Babula P, Adam V, Krska B, Kizek R. Sharka: the past, the present and the future. Viruses 2012; 4:2853–2901 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Scholthof KBG, Adkins S, Czosnek H, Palukaitis P, Jacquot E et al. Top 10 plant viruses in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 2011; 12:938–954 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Atanasoff D. Plum pox a new virus disease. Ann Univ Sofia, Fac Agri Silvicul 1932; 11:49–69
     [Google Scholar]
  8. García JA, Cambra M. Plum pox virus and sharka disease. Plant Viruses 2007; 1:69–79
     [Google Scholar]
  9. James D, Thompson D. Hosts and symptoms of Plum pox virus: ornamental and wild Prunus species. EPPO Bulletin 2006; 36:222–224 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gildow F, Damsteegt V, Stone A, Schneider W, Luster D et al. Plum pox in North America: identification of aphid vectors and a potential role for fruit in virus spread. Phytopathology 2004; 94:868–874 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Labonne G, Yvon M, Quiot JB, Avinent L, Llacer G. Aphids as potential vectors of Plum pox virus: com-parison of methods of testing and epidemiological con-sequences. Acta Hortic 1995; 386:207–218
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Kerlan C, Dunez J. Différentiation biologique et sérologique de souches Du virus de la sharka. Ann Phytopathol 1979; 11:241–250
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Wetzel T, Candresse T, Ravelonandro M, Delbos RP, Mazyad H et al. Nucleotide sequence of the 3'-terminal region of the RNA of the El Amar strain of plum pox potyvirus. J Gen Virol 1991; 72:1741–1746 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Nemchinov L, Hadidi A. Characterization of the sour cherry strain of Plum pox virus . Phytopathology 1996; 86:575–580 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Glasa M, Palkovics L, Komínek P, Labonne G, Pittnerová S et al. Geographically and temporally distant natural recombinant isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV) are genetically very similar and form a unique PPV subgroup. J Gen Virol 2004; 85:2671–2681 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. James D, Varga A. Nucleotide sequence analysis of Plum pox virus isolate W3174: evidence of a new strain. Virus Res 2005; 110:143–150 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Serçe CU, Candresse T, Svanella-Dumas L, Krizbai L, Gazel M et al. Further characterization of a new recombinant group of Plum pox virus isolates, PPV-T, found in orchards in the ankara province of turkey. Virus Res 2009; 142:121–126 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Glasa M, Prikhodko Y, Predajňa L, Nagyová A, Shneyder Y et al. Characterization of sour cherry isolates of Plum pox virus from the Volga Basin in russia reveals a new cherry strain of the virus. Phytopathology 2013; 103:972–979 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Palmisano F, Boscia D, Minafra A, Myrta A, Candresse T. An atypical Albanian isolateof Plum pox virus could be the progenitor of the Marcus strain. 22nd International Conference on Virus and Other Graft Transmissible Diseases of Fruit Crops Rome: Book of Abstracts; 2012 p 33
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chirkov S, Ivanov P, Sheveleva A, Zakubanskiy A, Osipov G. New highly divergent Plum pox virus isolates infecting sour cherry in Russia. Virology 2017; 502:56–62 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Sihelská N, Glasa M, Šubr ZW. Host preference of the major strains of Plum pox virus —Opinions based on regional and world-wide sequence data. J Integr Agric 2017; 16:510–515 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Laín S, Riechmann JL, García JA. The complete nucleotide sequence of plum pox potyvirus RNA. Virus Res 1989; 13:157–172 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Revers F, García JA. Molecular biology of potyviruses. Adv Virus Res 2015; 92:101–199 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chung BY-W, Miller WA, Atkins JF, Firth AE. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:5897–5902 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Vijayapalani P, Maeshima M, Nagasaki-Takekuchi N, Miller WA. Interaction of the trans-frame potyvirus protein P3N-PIPO with host protein PCaP1 facilitates potyvirus movement. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002639 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. White KA. The polymerase slips and PIPO exists. EMBO Rep 2015; 16:885–886 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Roossinck MJ. Mechanisms of plant virus evolution. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1997; 35:191–209 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Sokhandan-Bashir N, Melcher U. Population genetic analysis of grapevine fanleaf virus. Arch Virol 2012; 157:1919–1929 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Yasaka R, Fukagawa H, Ikematsu M, Soda H, Korkmaz S et al. The timescale of emergence and spread of turnip mosaic potyvirus. Sci Rep 2017; 7:4240 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubio L, Guerri J, Moreno P. Genetic variability and evolutionary dynamics of viruses of the family Closteroviridae . Front Microbiol 2013; 4:151 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Domingo E, Holland JJ. Rna virus mutations and fitness for survival. Annu Rev Microbiol 1997; 51:151–178 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao F, Zou W, Xie L, Zhan J. Adaptive evolution and demographic history contribute to the divergent population genetic structure of Potato virus Y between China and Japan. Evol Appl 2017; 10:379–390 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:14338–14343 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang J-R, Zhuang S-M, Zhang J. Impact of translational error-induced and error-free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:421 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Elena SF, Agudelo-Romero P, Carrasco P, Codoñer FM, Martín S et al. Experimental evolution of plant RNA viruses. Heredity 2008; 100:478–483 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. García-Arenal F, Fraile A, Malpica JM. Variability and genetic structure of plant virus populations. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2001; 39:157–186 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsompana M, Abad J, Purugganan M, Moyer JW. The molecular population genetics of the Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) genome. Mol Ecol 2005; 14:53–66 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gadiou S, Šafářová D, Navrátil M. Genetic variability of Plum pox virus isolates in the Czech Republic. Eur J Plant Pathol 2008; 121:513–517 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Glasa M, Candresse T. The SharCo Consortium A large scale study of Plum pox virus genetic diversity and of its geographical distribution. 22 nd International Conference on Virus and Other Graft Transmissible Diseases of Fruit Crops 38 Rome: Book of Abstracts; 2012
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheveleva A, Ivanov P, Prihodko Y, James D, Chirkov S. Occurrence and Genetic Diversity of Winona-Like Plum pox virus Isolates in Russia. Plant Dis 2012; 96:1135–1142 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. James D, Varga A, Sanderson D. Genetic diversity of Plum pox virus : strains, disease and related challenges for control. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 2013; 35:431–441 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Glasa M, Paunovic S, Jevremovic D, Myrta A, Pittnerová S et al. Analysis of recombinant Plum pox virus (PPV) isolates from Serbia confirms genetic homogeneity and supports a regional origin for the PPV-Rec subgroup. Arch Virol 2005; 150:2051–2060 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Gürcan K, Teber S, Çağlayan K. Further investigation of a genetically divergent group of Plum pox virus-M strain in turkey. J Plant Pathol 2019; 101:385–391 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Teber S, Ceylan A, Gürcan K, Candresse T, Ulubaş Serçe Ç. et al. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of the T strain of Plum pox virus . Plant Pathol 2019; 68:755–763 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-ichi, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3059–3066 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Telford MJ. TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:W7–W13 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol 2015; 1:1–5 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith J. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol 1992; 34:26–29 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Holmes EC, Worobey M, Rambaut A. Phylogenetic evidence for recombination in dengue virus. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16:405–409 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 1999; 265:218–225 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ. Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:573–582 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Martin D, Rybicki E. Rdp: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:562–563 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. McGuire G, Wright F. TOPAL 2.0: improved detection of mosaic sequences within multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:130–134 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Posada D, Crandall KA. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:13757–13762 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Martin DP, Posada D, Crandall KA, Williamson C. A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2005; 21:98–102 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 2007; 176:1035–1047 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Lemey P, Lott M, Martin DP, Moulton V. Identifying recombinants in human and primate immunodeficiency virus sequence alignments using quartet scanning. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10:126 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2003; 52:696–704 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16:1114 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Fourment M, Gibbs MJ. PATRISTIC: a program for calculating patristic distances and graphically comparing the components of genetic change. BMC Evol Biol 2006; 6:1 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Xia X. Topological bias in distance-based phylogenetic methods: problems with over- and underestimated genetic distances. Evol Bioinform Online 2006; 2:117693430600200–117693430600387 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rambaut A, Lam TT, Max Carvalho L, Pybus OG. Exploring the temporal structure of heterochronous sequences using TempEst (formerly Path-O-Gen). Virus Evol 20162s:vew007
     [Google Scholar]
  65. To TH, Jung M, Lycett S, Gascuel O. Fast dating using least-squares criteria and algorithms. Syst Biol 2016; 65:82–97 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohammadi M, Gibbs AJ, Hosseini A, Hosseini S. An Iranian genomic sequence of beet mosaic virus provides insights into diversity and evolution of the world population. Virus Genes 2018; 54:272–279 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol 2017; 34:3299–3302 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989; 123:585–595
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hudson RR, Boos DD, Kaplan NL. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol Biol Evol 1992a; 9:138–151 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hudson RR. A new statistic for detecting genetic differentiation. Genetics 2000; 155:2011–2014
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hudson RR, Slatkin M, Maddison WP. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 1992b; 132:583–589
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R, DnaSP RR. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:2496–2497 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Pond SLK, Frost SDW, Muse SV. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:676–679 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Xia X, Xie Z, Salemi M, Chen L, Wang Y. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003; 26:1–7 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  75. James D, Varga A, Thompson D, Hayes S. Detection of a new and unusual isolate of Plum pox virus in plum (Prunus domestica). Plant Dis 2003; 87:1119–1124 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Oishi M, Inoue Y, Kagatsume R, Shukuya T, Kasukabe R et al. First report of Plum pox virus strain M in Japan. Plant Dis 2018; 829:102
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the beast 1.7. Mol Biol Evol 2012; 29:1969–1973 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Segundo F, Jones RAC, Matsuoka H, Ohshima K, Kreuze J et al. Potato virus Y; the Andean connection. Virus Evol in press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Gibbs A, Ohshima K. Potyviruses and the digital revolution. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010; 48:205–223 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Kollerová E, Nováková S, Šubr Z, Glasa M. Plum Pox Virus mixed infection detected on apricot in pakistan. Plant Dis 2006; 90:1108 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Thompson D, Varga A, De Costa H, Birch C, Glasa M et al. First report of Plum pox virus recombinant strain on prunus spp. in canada. Plant Dis 2009; 93:674 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Fisher RA. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1930
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 1931; 16:97–159
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Dallot S, Karychev R, Dolgikh S, Thébaud G, Jacquot E et al. First report of Plum pox virus strain W in Kazakhstan, on Prunus domestica . Plant Dis in press 2019 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Osman T. Egypt on the Brink: from Nasser to the Muslim Brotherhood Yale University Press; 2013
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Bortiri E, SH O, Jiang J, Baggett S, Granger A et al. Phylogeny and systematics of Prunus (Rosaceae) as determined by sequence analysis of ITS and the Chloroplast trnL-trnF Spacer DNA. Syst Bot 2001; 26:797–807
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Chin S-W, Shaw J, Haberle R, Wen J, Potter D. Diversification of almonds, peaches, plums and cherries - molecular systematics and biogeographic history of Prunus (Rosaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 2014; 76:34–48 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Shi S, Li J, Sun J, Yu J, Zhou S. Phylogeny and classification of Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae). J Integr Plant Biol 2013; 55:1069–1079 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Mudge K, Janick J, Scofield S, Goldschmidt EE. A history of grafting. Horticultural Rev 2009; 35:437–493
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants of the Old World. The Origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in South-West Asia , 4th Edition . Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Oxford University Press; 2012 p 243pp
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Janick J. The origin of fruits, fruit growing and fruit breeding. Plant Breeding Rev 2005; 25:255–320
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Spengler RN, Maksudov F, Bullion E, Merkle A, Hermes T et al. Arboreal crops on the medieval silk road: archaeobotanical studies at tashbulak. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201409 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Zheng Y, Crawford GW, Chen X. Archaeological evidence for peach (Prunus persica) cultivation and domestication in China. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106595 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhivondov A, Vitanova I, Ivanova D, Minev I, Stoev A et al. Major results of plum breeding in Bulgaria. Acta Agric Serb 2012; 33:3–11
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Duchêne S, Holmes EC, SYW H. Analyses of evolutionary dynamics in viruses are hindered by a time-dependent bias in rate estimates. Proc Biol Sci 1786; 2014:281
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Hillung J, Elena SF, Cuevas JM. Intra-Specific variability and biological relevance of P3N-PIPO protein length in potyviruses. BMC Evol Biol 2013; 13:249 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Deng P, Wu Z, Wang A. The multifunctional protein CI of potyviruses plays interlinked and distinct roles in viral genome replication and intercellular movement. Virol J 2015; 12:141 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157:105–132 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Wallis CM, Stone AL, Sherman DJ, Damsteegt VD, Gildow FE et al. Adaptation of plum pox virus to a herbaceous host (Pisum sativum) following serial passages. J Gen Virol 2007; 88:2839–2845 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001308
Loading
The global phylogeny of Plum pox virus is emerging
J. Gen. Virol. 100, 1457 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001308
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001308
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.001308
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error