Age- and strain-dependent differences in the outcome of experimental infections of domestic pigs with wild boar pseudorabies virus isolates Free

Abstract

Although pseudorabies virus (PRV) has been eradicated in domestic swine in many countries, its presence in wild boars remains a threat for a reintroduction into the currently unprotected swine population. To assess the possible impact of such a reintroduction in a naive herd, an infection study using two genetically characterized wild boar PRV isolates (BEL24043 and BEL20075) representative for wild boar strains circulating in south-western and central Europe and the virulent NIA3 reference strain was performed in 2- and 15-week-old domestic pigs. Our study revealed an attenuated nature of both wild boar strains in 15-week-old pigs. In contrast, it showed the capacity of strain BEL24043 to induce severe clinical symptoms and mortality in young piglets, thereby confirming that the known age dependency of disease outcome after PRV infection also holds for wild boar isolates. Despite the absence of clinical disease in 15-week-old sows, both wild boar PRV strains were able to induce seroconversion, but to a different extent. Importantly, differences in infection and transmission capacity of both strains were observed in 15-week-old sows. Strain BEL24043 induced a more prolonged and disseminated infection than strain BEL20075 and was able to spread efficiently to contact animals, indicative of its capacity to induce a sustained infection. In conclusion, it was shown that a reintroduction of a wild boar isolate into the domestic swine population could have serious economic consequences due to the induction of clinical symptoms in piglets and by jeopardizing the PRV-negative status.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000347
2016-02-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/97/2/487.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000347&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Capua I., Fico R., Banks M., Tamba M., Calzetta G. 1997a; Isolation and characterisation of an Aujeszky's disease virus naturally infecting a wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Microbiol 55:141–146 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Capua I., Casaccia C., Calzetta G., Caporale V. 1997b; Characterisation of Aujeszky's disease viruses isolated from domestic animals and from a wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Italy between 1972 and 1995. Vet Microbiol 57:143–149 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hahn E. C., Page G. R., Hahn P. S., Gillis K. D., Romero C., Annelli J. A., Gibbs E. P. 1997; Mechanisms of transmission of Aujeszky's disease virus originating from feral swine in the USA. Vet Microbiol 55:123–130 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hahn E. C., Fadl-Alla B., Lichtensteiger C. A. 2010; Variation of Aujeszky's disease viruses in wild swine in USA. Vet Microbiol 143:45–51 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McFerran J. B., Dow C., McCracken R. M. 1979; Experimental studies in weaned pigs with three vaccines against Aujeszky's disease. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2:327–334 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Müller T., Teuffert J., Ziedler K., Possardt C., Kramer M., Staubach C., Conraths F. J. 1998; Pseudorabies in the European wild boar from Eastern Germany. J Wildl Dis 34:251–258 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Müller T. F., Teuffert J., Zellmer R., Conraths F. J. 2001; Experimental infection of European wild boars and domestic pigs with pseudorabies viruses with differing virulence. Am J Vet Res 62:252–258 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Müller T., Klupp B. G., Freuling C., Hoffmann B., Mojcicz M., Capua I., Palfi V., Toma B., Lutz W., other authors. 2010; Characterization of pseudorabies virus of wild boar origin from Europe. Epidemiol Infect 138:1590–1600 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Müller T., Hahn E. C., Tottewitz F., Kramer M., Klupp B. G., Mettenleiter T. C., Freuling C. 2011; Pseudorabies virus in wild swine: a global perspective. Arch Virol 156:1691–1705 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pannwitz G., Freuling C., Denzin N., Schaarschmidt U., Nieper H., Hlinak A., Burkhardt S., Klopries M., Dedek J., other authors. 2012; A long-term serological survey on Aujeszky's disease virus infections in wild boar in East Germany. Epidemiol Infect 140:348–358 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pomeranz L. E., Reynolds A. E., Hengartner C. J. 2005; Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:462–500 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Romero C. H., Meade P., Santagata J., Gillis K., Lollis G., Hahn E. C., Gibbs E. P. 1997; Genital infection and transmission of pseudorabies virus in feral swine in Florida, USA. Vet Microbiol 55:131–139 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Romero C. H., Meade P. N., Shultz J. E., Chung H. Y., Gibbs E. P., Hahn E. C., Lollis G. 2001; Venereal transmission of pseudorabies viruses indigenous to feral swine. J Wildl Dis 37:289–296 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Van der Goot J. A., de Jong M. C., Koch G., Van Boven M. 2003; Comparison of the transmission characteristics of low and high pathogenicity avian influenza A virus (H5N2). Epidemiol Infect 131:1003–1013 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Velthuis A. G., Bouma A., Katsma W. E., Nodelijk G., De Jong M. C. 2007; Design and analysis of small-scale transmission experiments with animals. Epidemiol Infect 135:202–217 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Verpoest S., Cay A. B., Bertrand O., Saulmont M., De Regge N. 2014a; Isolation and characterization of pseudorabies virus from a wolf (Canis lupus) from Belgium. Eur J Wildl Res 60:149–153 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Verpoest S., Cay A. B., De Regge N. 2014b; Molecular characterization of Belgian pseudorabies virus isolates from domestic swine and wild boar. Vet Microbiol 172:72–77 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Verpoest S., Cay A. B., Favoreel H., De Regge N. 2015; Pseudorabies virus isolates from domestic pigs and wild boars show no apparent in vitro differences in replication kinetics and sensitivity to interferon induced antiviral status. J Gen Virol [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000347
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000347
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed