1887

Abstract

In scrapie-affected sheep flocks, host genotype plays a vital role in determining which sheep will succumb to scrapie and the incubation period. Consequently, within-flock scrapie dynamics is best understood within the context of the genotype profile of the flock. Here we describe a 17 month epidemic of scrapie in a commercially farmed flock of 230 genotyped Texel sheep. At the start of the study, 70% of the sheep were of three genotypes only: ARR/ARQ, ARH/ARQ and ARQ/ARQ. Only 15% of sheep encoded the disease-associated VRQ allele and only a single sheep (0·4%) was of the most susceptible VRQ/VRQ genotype. For susceptible genotypes there was a marked deficit (<0·025) of older animals (⩾3 years), implying that some cases of scrapie had occurred previously. In the ensuing 17 months, 18 sheep of known genotype were confirmed positive for the disease: seven VRQ/ARQ, six VRQ/ARH, two VRQ/ARR, three ARQ/ARQ. Median ages at death were 2·7, 2·8, 4·2 and 3·8 years respectively. Mortality rates were 55, 86, 13 and 3% respectively. Survival analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype on survivorship, but no difference between VRQ/ARQ and VRQ/ARH, or between VRQ/ARR and ARQ/ARQ. There was no difference in the survivorship of middle- and older-age cohorts of susceptible sheep. Scrapie risk group (as defined by genotype) was not associated with submission as a scrapie suspect but later found to be negative, or with dying of unknown causes on the farm.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2907
2002-11-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/83/11/0832907a.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2907&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allison P. D. 1995 Survival Analysis using the SAS System. A Practical Guide Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baylis M., Houston F., Goldmann W., Hunter N., McLean A. R. 2000; The signature of scrapie: differences in the PrP genotype profile of scrapie-affected and scrapie-free UK sheep flocks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 267:2029–2035
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Belt P. B. G. M., Muileman I. H., Schreuder B. E. C., Ruijter J. B.-d., Gielkens A. L. J., Smits M. A. 1995; Identification of five allelic variants of the sheep PrP gene and their association with natural scrapie. Journal of General Virology 76:509–517
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark A. M., Dawson M., Scott A. C. 1994; Scrapie associated fibrils in found dead sheep. Veterinary Record 134:650–651
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collett D. 1994 Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research . Texts in Statistical Science London: Chapman & Hall;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dawson M., Hoinville L. J., Hosie B. D., Hunter N. 1998; Guidance on the use of PrP genotyping as an aid to the control of clinical scrapie. Veterinary Record 142:623–625
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DEFRA 2001 National Scrapie Plan for Great Britain pp 28 Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs;
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elsen J. M., Amigues Y., Schelcher F., Ducrocq V., Andreoletti O., Eychenne F., Khang J. V. T., Poivey J. P., Lantier F., Laplanche J. L. 1999; Genetic susceptibility and transmission factors in scrapie: detailed analysis of an epidemic in a closed flock of Romanov. Archives of Virology 144:431–445
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldmann W., Hunter N., Smith G., Foster J., Hope J. 1994; PrP genotype and agent effects in scrapie: change in allelic interaction with different isolates of agent in sheep, a natural host of scrapie. Journal of General Virology 75:989–995
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunter N. 1997; Molecular biology and genetics of scrapie in sheep. In The Genetics of Sheep pp 225–240 Edited by Piper L., Ruvinsky A. Wallingford: CAB International;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunter N., Foster J. D., Goldmann W., Stear M. J., Hope J., Bostock C. 1996; Natural scrapie in a closed flock of Cheviot sheep occurs only in specific PrP genotypes. Archives of Virology 141:809–824
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunter N., Goldmann W., Foster J. D., Cairns D., Smith G. 1997a; Natural scrapie and PrP genotype: case-control studies in British sheep. Veterinary Record 141:137–140
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunter N., Moore L., Hosie B. D., Dingwall W. S., Greig A. 1997b; Association between natural scrapie and PrP genotype in a flock of Suffolk sheep in Scotland. Veterinary Record 140:59–63
    [Google Scholar]
  14. McLean A. R., Hoek A., Hoinville L. J., Gravenor M. B. 1999; Scrapie transmission in Britain: a recipe for a mathematical model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 266:2531–2538
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Matthews L., Coen P. G., Foster J. D., Hunter N., Woolhouse M. E. J. 2001; Population dynamics of a scrapie outbreak. Archives of Virology 146:1173–1186
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Simmons M. M., Ryder S. J., Chaplin M. C., Spencer Y. I., Webb C. R., Hoinville L. J., Ryan J., Stack M. J., Wells G. A. H., Wilesmith J. W. 2000; Scrapie surveillance in Great Britain: results of an abattoir survey, 1997/98. Veterinary Record 146:391–395
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Woolhouse M. E. J., Matthews L., Coen P., Stringer S. M., Foster J. D., Hunter N. 1999; Population dynamics of scrapie in a sheep flock. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 354:751–756
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2907
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-83-11-2907
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error