We previously observed that pseudorabies virus (PRV)-induced, cell-mediated cytolysis in pigs includes killing by natural killer (NK) cells. We also observed that IL-2 stimulation in vitro of naive PBMC expands porcine NK cells. The purpose of this study was to compare the phenotypes of the cytolytic subsets stimulated in vitro by PRV and by IL-2. PBMC were isolated from blood of PRV-immune and naive pigs and stimulated in vitro with PRV or IL-2. After 6 days, the frequency of various lymphocyte subsets in these cultured PBMC was determined by flow cytometry: the cells were separated with a magnet-activated cell sorter and the cytolytic activity of the separated populations was determined. When lymphocytes were separated and analysed with FACScan, the following lymphocyte subsets were discriminated: CD6+ CD8bright+ CD4− (CTL phenotype), CD6+ CD8dull+ CD4+ (the fraction containing memory T helper cells), CD6+ CD8− CD4+ (T helper cell phenotype), CD6− CD8dull+ CD4− γδ-T+ ( γδ-T cell phenotype), CD6− CD8dull+ CD4− γδ-T− (NK phenotype) and CD6− CD8− CD4− γδ-T− or γδ-T+. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that PRV stimulation of immune PBMC resulted in the occurrence of more CD6+ CD8+ and CD4+ CD8+ and fewer CD6− CD8+ and γδ-T+ CD8+ lymphocytes than IL-2 stimulation of naive PBMC (P<0·05). It was demonstrated further that killing by PRV-stimulated PBMC was mediated mainly by CD6+ CD8+ T lymphocytes. Killing by IL-2-stimulated PBMC was mediated mainly by CD6− CD8+ T lymphocytes. These results demonstrate that both natural killing and killing by classical PRV-specific CTL were detected in PRV-immune pigs, whereas IL-2 stimulation of PBMC isolated from naive pigs mainly induced natural killing.
Chinsakchai, S. & Molitor, T. W. (1992). Replication and immunosuppressive effects of pseudorabies virus on swine peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology30, 247-260.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
De Bruin, M. G. M., Van Rooij, E. M. A., Voermans, J. J. M., De Visser, Y. E., Bianchi, A. T. J. & Kimman, T. G. (1997). Establishment and characterization of porcine cytolytic cell lines and clones.Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology59, 337-347.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
De Wind, N., Zijderveld, A., Glazenburg, K., Gielkens, A. & Berns, A. (1990). Linker insertion mutagenesis of herpesviruses: inactivation of single genes within the Us region of pseudorabies virus.Journal of Virology64, 4691-4696.
[Google Scholar]
Gielkens, A. L. J., Moormann, R. J. M., Van Oirschot, J. T. & Berns, A. J. M. (1989). Vaccine efficacy and innocuity of strain 783 of Aujeszky’s disease virus. In Vaccination and Control of Aujeszky’s Disease, pp. 27-35. Edited by J. T. Van Oirschot. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Jonjic, S. & Koszinowski, U. H. (1984). Monoclonal antibodies reactive with swine lymphocytes. I. Antibodies to membrane structures that define the cytolytic T lymphocyte subset in the swine.Journal of Immunology133, 647-652.
[Google Scholar]
Kaeffer, B., Bottreau, E., Phan Thanh, L., Olivier, M. & Salmon, H. (1990). Histocompatible miniature boar model: selection of transformed cell lines of B and T lineages producing retrovirus.International Journal of Cancer46, 481-488.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Kasza, L., Shadduck, J. A. & Christofinis, G. J. (1971). Establishment, viral susceptibility, and biological characteristics of a swine kidney cell line SK-6.Research in Veterinary Science13, 46-51.
[Google Scholar]
Kimman, T. G., Bianchi, A. T. J., De Bruin, T. G. M., Mulder, W. A. M., Priem, J. & Voermans, J. J. M. (1995a). Interaction of pseudorabies virus with immortalized porcine B cells: influence on surface class I and II major histocompatibility complex and immunoglobulin M expression.Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology45, 253-263.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Kimman, T. G., De Bruin, T. G. M., Voermans, J. J. M., Peeters, B. P. H. & Bianchi, A. T. J. (1995b). Development and antigen specificity of the lymphoproliferation responses of pigs to pseudorabies virus: dichotomy between secondary B- and T-cell responses.Immunology86, 372-378.
[Google Scholar]
Kimman, T. G., De Bruin, T. G. M., Voermans, J. J. M. & Bianchi, A. T. J. (1996). Cell-mediated immunity to pseudorabies virus: cytolytic effector cells with characteristics of lymphokine-activated killer cells lyse virus-infected and glycoprotein gB- and gC-transfected L14 cells.Journal of General Virology77, 987-990.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Kirkham, P. A., Takamatsu, H., Yang, H. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1996). Porcine CD3 epsilon: its characterization, expression and involvement in activation of porcine T lymphocytes.Immunology87, 616-623.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
McFerran, J. B. & Dow, C. (1975). Studies on immunisation of pigs with the Bartha strain of Aujeszky’s disease virus.Research in Veterinary Science19, 17-22.
[Google Scholar]
Pauly, T., Elbers, K., König, M., Lengsfeld, T., Saalmüller, A. & Thiel, H.-J. (1995). Classical swine fever virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and identification of a T cell epitope.Journal of General Virology76, 3039-3049.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Pauly, T., Weiland, E., Hirt, W., Dreyer-Bux, C., Maurer, S., Summerfield, A. & Saalmüller, A. (1996). Differentiation between MHC-restricted and non-MHC-restricted porcine cytolytic T lymphocytes.Immunology88, 238-246.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Pescovitz, M. D., Lunney, J. K. & Sachs, D. H. (1984). Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies reactive with porcine PBL.Journal of Immunology133, 368-375.
[Google Scholar]
Pescovitz, M. D., Lowman, M. A. & Sachs, D. H. (1988). Expression of T-cell associated antigens by porcine natural killer cells.Immunology65, 267-271.
[Google Scholar]
Saalmüller, A., Hirt, W., Maurer, S. & Weiland, E. (1994a). Discrimination between two subsets of porcine CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes by the expression of CD5 antigen.Immunology81, 578-583.
[Google Scholar]
Saalmüller, A., Aasted, B., Canals, A., Dominguez, J., Goldman, T., Lunney, J. K., Maurer, S., Pauly, T., Pescovitz, M. D., Pospisil, R., Salmon, H., Trbichavsky, I., Valpotic, I., Vizcaino, J. S., Weiland, E. & Zuckermann, F. (1994b). Analysis of monoclonal antibodies reactive with porcine CD6.Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology43, 243-247.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Sachs, D. H., Leight, G., Cone, J., Schwarz, S., Stuart, L. & Rosenberg, S. (1976). Transplantation in miniature swine. I. Fixation of the major histocompatibility complex.Transplantation22, 559-567.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Summerfield, A., Rziha, H. J. & Saalmüller, A. (1996). Functional characterization of porcine CD4+ CD8+ extrathymic T lymphocytes.Cellular Immunology168, 291-296.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Yang, H. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1996). Phenotypic classification of porcine lymphocyte subpopulations in blood and lymphoid tissues.Immunology89, 76-83.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Yang, H. & Parkhouse, R. M. E. (1997). Differential expression of CD8 epitopes amongst porcine CD8-positive functional lymphocyte subsets.Immunology92, 45-52.[CrossRef][Google Scholar]
Zuckermann, F. A. & Husmann, R. J. (1996). Functional and phenotypic analysis of porcine peripheral blood CD4/CD8 double-positive T cells.Immunology87, 500-512.
[Google Scholar]
Zuckermann, F. A., Zsak, L., Mettenleiter, T. C. & Ben-Porat, T. (1990). Pseudorabies virus glycoprotein gIII is a major target antigen for murine and swine virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes.Journal of Virology64, 802-812.
[Google Scholar]