The aim of this study was to investigate the importance of cellular immunity in foot-and-mouth disease in cattle, in particular to determine whether a CD8+ T-cell response could be detected, as these cells may play a role in both immunity and virus persistence. As attempts to characterize classical cytotoxic T cells had yielded non-reproducible results, largely due to high backgrounds in control cultures, a proliferation assay was developed that was demonstrated to detect antigen-specific, MHC class I-restricted bovine CD8+ cells responding to foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Proliferative CD8+ T-cell responses were detected consistently from 10 to 14 days following infection with FMDV and typically lasted 3-4 weeks. The role of CD8+ T cells in control of the disease, in particular their relevance for the establishment of persistence, may now be investigated.
AmadoriM.,
ArchettiI. L.,
VerardiR.,
BerneriC.1992b; Isolation of mononuclear cytotoxic cells from cattle vaccinated against foot-and-mouth disease. Archives of Virology 122:293–306
AmadoriM.,
ArchettiI. L.,
VerardiR.,
BerneriC.1995; Role of a distinct population of bovine γδ T cells in the immune response to viral agents. Viral Immunology 8:81–91
BeckerY.1994; Need for cellular and humoral immune responses in bovines to ensure protection from foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)–a point of view. Virus Genes 8:199–214
BorrowP.,
TonksP.,
WelshC. J. R.,
NashA. A.1992; The role of CD8+ T cells in the acute and chronic phases of Theiler′s murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced disease in mice. Journal of General Virology 73:1861–1865
BrownF.,
GravesJ. H.1959; Changes in the specificity and electrophoretic mobility of the precipitating antibodies present in the serum of cattle recovering from foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 183:1688–1691
CollenT.1994; Foot-and-mouth disease (Aphthovirus): viral T cell epitopes. In Cell-MediatedImmunity in Ruminants pp 173–212 Edited by
GoddeevisB. M. L.,
MorrisonI.
Boca Raton: CRC Press;
CollenT.,
BaronJ.,
ChilderstoneA.,
CorteynA.,
DoelT. R.,
FlintM.,
Garcia-ValcarcelM.,
ParkhouseR. M. E.,
RyanM. D.1998; Heterotypic recognition of recombinant FMDV proteins by bovine T-cells: the polymerase (P3Dpol) as an immunodominant T-cell immunogen. Virus Research 56:125–133
DiMarchiR.,
BrookeG.,
GaleC.,
CracknellV.,
DoelT. R.,
MowatN.1986; Protection of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease by a synthetic peptide. Science 232:639–641
DoelT. R.,
FlettonB. W.,
StapleR. F.1982; Qualitative assessment of 146S particles of FMDV in preparations destined for vaccines. Developments in Biological Standardization 50:69–81
Garcia-ValcarcelM.,
DoelT.,
CollenT.,
RyanM.,
ParkhouseR. M. E.1996; Recognition of foot-and-mouth disease virus and its capsid protein VP1 by bovine peripheral T lymphocytes. Journal of General Virology 77:727–735
GlassE. J.,
MillarP.1994; Induction of effective cross–reactive immunity by FMDV peptides is critically dependent upon specific MHC-peptide-T cell interactions. Immunology 82:1–8
McCulloughK.,
De SimoneF.,
BrocchiE.,
CapucciL.,
CrowtherJ. R.,
KihmU.1992; Protective immune response against foot-and-mouth disease. Journal of Virology 66:1835–1840
MackowiakC.,
LangC.,
FontaineJ.,
CamandR.,
PetermannH. G.1962; Relationship between neutralising antibody titre and protection in animals immunised against foot-and-mouth disease. Annals de l’Institut Pasteur 103:252–261
NaessensJ.,
OlubayoR. O.,
DavisW. C.,
HopkinsJ.1993; Crossreactivity of workshop antibodies with cells from domestic and wild ruminants. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 39:283–290
StrohmaierK.,
FranzeR.,
AdamK.-H.1982; Location and characterization of the antigenic portion of the FMDV immunizing protein. Journal of General Virology 59:295–306
Van LieropM. J. C.,
van MaanenK.,
MeloenR. H.,
RuttenV. P. M. G.,
de JongM. A. C.,
HensenE. J.1992; Proliferative lymphocyte responses to foot-and-mouth disease virus and three FMDV peptides after vaccination or immunization with these peptides in cattle. Immunology 75:406–413