1887

Abstract

The putative 38 kDa movement protein (P38) gene, located on the RNA2 of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus (GFLV), was cloned in and expressed as a fusion protein fused to six histidines (6HisP38). This protein was purified and used to produce a specific polyclonal antiserum from which immunoglobulins were isolated by immunoaffinity against the recombinant 6HisP38. Western immunoblot analyses on GFLV RNA2 maturation products showed that the antibodies were specific for P38 protein. This protein was detected as early as 18 h post-inoculation in GFLV-infected protoplasts and accumulated to very high levels. Tissue-prints and time course experiments on infected plants confirmed that P38 is present at a high level late in infection and is a final maturation product of the GFLV RNA2 polyprotein . P94 and P66 intermediates of maturation and polyprotein P2 were also detected but in very low concentrations. No significant difference was observed in the relative amounts of P66 and P94 detected , contrary to what occurs . Subcellular fractionation studies showed that P38, although mainly cytosolic, is also found in association with cell wall and membranes. Thought to be the GFLV movement protein, P38 would thus behave in an ‘atypical’ manner.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-4-907
1995-04-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/76/4/JV0760040907.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-4-907&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Berna A., Gafny R., Wolf S., Lucas W. J., Holt C. A., Beachy R. N. 1991; The TMV movement protein-role of the C-terminal 73 amino acids in subcellular localization and function. Virology 182:682–689
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassab G. I., Varner J. E. 1987; Immunocytolocalization of extensine in developing soybean seed coats by immunogold-silver staining and by tissue printing on nitrocellulose paper. Journal of Cell Biology 105:2581–2588
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Citovsky V. 1993; Probing plasmodesmal transport with plant viruses. Plant Physiology 102:1071–1076
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Demangeat G., Hemmer O., Reinbolt J., Mayo M. A., Fritsch C. 1992; Virus-specific proteins in cells infected with tomato black ring nepovirus: evidence for proteolytic processing in vivo . Journal of General Virology 73:1609–1614
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldbach R., Eggen R., De Jager C., Van Kammen A., Van Lent J., Rezeman G., Wellink J. 1990; Genetic organization. evolution and expression of plant viral RNA genomes. In Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interactions pp 147–162 Edited by Fraser R. S. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hans F., Fuchs M., Pinck L. 1992; Replication of grapevine fanleaf virus satellite RNA transcripts in Chenopodium quinoa protoplasts. Journal of General Virology 73:2517–2523
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison B. D., Murant A. F. 1977; Nematode transmissibility of pseudorecombinants of tomato black ring virus. Annals of Applied Biology 86:209–212
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harrison B. D., Murant A. F., Mayo M. A., Roberts I. M. 1974; Distribution of determinants of symptom production. host range and nematode transmissibility between the two RNA components of raspberry ringspot virus. Journal of General Virology 22:233–247
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hibrand L., Le Gall O., Candresse T., Dunez J. 1992; Immunodetection of the proteins encoded by grapevine chrome mosaic nepovirus RNA2. Journal of General Virology 73:2093–2098
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kasteel D., Wellink J., Verver J., Van Lent J., Goldbach R., Van Kammen A. 1993; The involvement of cowpea mosaic virus M RNA-encoded proteins in tubule formation. Journal of General Virology 74:1721–1724
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Laemmli U. K. 1970; Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Margis R., Hans F., Pinck L. 1993; VPg Northem-immunoblots as a means for detection of viral RNAs in protoplasts or plants infected with grapevine fanleaf nepovirus. Archives of Virology 131:225–232
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Margis R., Pinck L. 1992; Effects of site directed mutagenesis on the presumed catalytic triad and substrate binding pocket of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus 24K proteinase. Virology 90:884–888
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Margis R., Ritzenthaler C., Reinbolt J., Pinck M., Pinck L. 1993; Genome organization of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus RNA2 deduced from the 122K polyprotein P2 in vitro cleavage products. Journal of General Virology 74:1919–1926
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Margis R., Viry M., Pinck M., Bardonnet N., Pinck L. 1994; Differential proteolytic activitries of precursor and mature forms of the 24K proteinase of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus. Virology 200:79–86
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Margis R., Viry M., Pinck M., Pinck L. 1991; Cloning and in vitro characterization of the grapevine fanleaf virus proteinase cistron. Virology 185:779–787
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Moser O. 1990; Etude de deuxproteines non structurales de deux virus de plantes: le virus de la mosaique du tabac et le virus du court-noue de la vigne. PhD thesis. University Louis Pasteur Strasbourg; France:
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Moser O., Fuchs M., Pinck L., Stussi-Garaud C. 1992; Immunodetection of grapevine fanleaf virus satellite RNA-encoded protein in infected Chenopodium quinoa . Journal of General Virology 73:3033–3038
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mushegian A. R. 1994; The putative movement domain encoded by nepovirus RNA-2 is conserved in all sequenced nepoviruses. Archives of Virology 135:437–441
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nagai K., Thogersen H. C. 1984; Generation of /β-globin by sequence specific proteolysis of a hybrid protein produced in Escherichia coli . Nature 309:810–812
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Perbal M.-C., Thomas C. L., Maule A. J. 1993; Cauliflower mosaic virus gene I product (PI) forms tubular structures which extend from the surface of infected protoplasts. Virology 195:281–285
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinck M., Reinbolt J., Loudes A.-M., Le Ret M., Pinck L. 1991; Primary structure and location of the genome-linked protein (VPg) of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus. FEBS Letters 284:117–119
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rezelman G., Van Kammen A., Wellink J. 1989; Expression of cowpea mosaic virus M RNA in cowpea protoplasts. Journal of General Virology 70:3043–3050
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ritzenthaler C., Viry M., Pinck M., Margis R., Fuchs M., Pinck L. 1991; Complete nucleotide sequence and genetic organization of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus RNA1. Journal of General Virology 72:2357–2365
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Robinson D. J., Barker H., Harrison B. D., Mayo M. A. 1980; Replication of RNA-1 of tomato black ring virus independently of RNA-2. Journal of General Virology 51:317–326
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Serghini M. A., Fuchs M., Pinck M., Reinbolt J., Walter B., Pinck L. 1990; RNA2 of grapevine fanleaf virus: sequence analysis and coat protein cistron location. Journal of General Virology 71:1433–1441
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Serghini M. A., Ritzenthaler C., Pinck L. 1989; A rapid and efficient ‘miniprep’ for isolation of plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 17:3604
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Shanks M., Tomenius K., Clapham D., Huskisson N. S., Barker P. J., Wilson I. G., Maule A. J., Lomonossof G. P. 1989; Identification and subcellular localization of a putative cell-to-cell transport protein from red clover mottle virus. Virology 173:400–407
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stuber D., Matile H., Garotta G. 1990; System for high-level production in Escherichia coli and rapid purification of recombinant proteins: application to epitope mapping. preparation of antibodies. and structure-function analysis. In Immunological Methods vol 4 pp 121–152 Edited by Lefkovits I., Pemis B. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Lent J., Storms M., Van Der Meer F., Wellink J., Goldbach R. 1991; Tubular structures involved in movement of cowpea mosaic virus are also formed in infected cowpea protoplasts. Journal of General Virology 72:2615–2623
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Viry M., Serghini M. A., Hans F., Ritzenthaler C., Pinck M., Pinck L. 1993; Biologically active transcripts from cloned cDNA of genomic grapevine fanleaf nepovirus RNAs. Journal of General Virology 74:169–174
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ward C. W. 1993; Progress towards a higher taxonomy of viruses. Research in Virology 144:419–453
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Wellink J., Jaegle M., Prinz H., van Kammen A., Goldbach R. 1987; Expression of the middle component RNA of cowpea mosaic virus in vivo . Journal of General Virology 68:2577–2585
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wellink J., Van Lent J. W. M., Verver J., Sijen T., Goldbach R. W., Van Kammen A. B. 1993; The cowpea mosaic virus m-RNA-excoded 48-kiloDalton protein is responsible for induction of tubular structures in protoplasts. Journal of Virology 67:3660–3664
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wieczorek A., Sanfacjon H. 1993; Characterization and subcellular localization of tomato ringspot nepovirus putative movement protein. Virology 194:734–742
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-4-907
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-4-907
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error