1887

Abstract

The genomic RNA of potyvirases has a characteristic 5′ non-translated region (5′NTR) to which a viral protein, VPg, is covalently attached. This suggests that the viral RNA lacks a conventional cap structure and thus its translation may not proceed in the same way as most cellular mRNAs. To investigate the role of the 5′NTR during translation, various derivatives of the turnip mosaic potyvirus (TuMV) leader were fused to the reporter gene -glucuronidase (GUS). These constructs were used to monitor the efficiency of translation in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate and following microprojectile DNA delivery into tobacco cell suspensions. GUS transcripts fused with the TuMV 5′NTR, whether they were capped or not, were efficiently translated, whereas GUS transcripts without the viral leader needed to be capped for expression. When transcripts of the viral leader were supplied in excess over functional transcripts, translation was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, transcripts synthesized from the reverse complement of the 5′NTR inhibited translation to the same extent as the wild-type sequence, indicating that cap independence was not conferred by a specific sequence within the viral leader. A stable hairpin loop was placed in front or after the viral sequence. This hairpin loop normally prevented translation of control GUS transcripts but when the viral leader was positioned after it a significant level of GUS activity was measured, whether the transcripts were capped or not. On the other hand, when the hairpin loop was positioned after the viral leader, no GUS activity was measured. These results suggested that ribosomes bound to an internal site within the TuMV 5′NTR and then presumably scanned the sequence for the initiator AUG.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157
1994-11-01
2022-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/75/11/JV0750113157.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Belsham G. J., Lomonossoff G. P. 1991; The mechanism of translation of cowpea mosaic virus middle component RNA: no evidence for internal initiation from experiments in an animal cell transient expression system. Journal of General Virology 72:3109–3113
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carrington J. C., Freed D. D. 1990; Cap-independent enhancement of translation by a plant potyvirus 5′ nontranslated region. Journal of Virology 64:1590–1597
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Charest P. J., Caléro N., Lachance D., Dalta R. S. S., Duchêsne L. C., Tsang E. W. T. 1993; Microprojectile-DNA delivery in conifer species: factors affecting assessment of transient gene expression using the β-glucuronidase reporter gene. Plant Cell Reports 12:189–193
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dolph P. C., Huang J., Schneider R. J. 1990; Translation by the adenovirus tripartite leader: elements which determine independence from cap-binding protein complex. Journal of Virology 64:2669–2677
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Duke G. M., Hoffman M. A., Palmenberg A. C. 1992; Sequence and structural elements that contribute to efficient encephalomyo-carditis virus RNA translation. Journal of Virology 66:1602–1609
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fütterer J., Kiss-Laszlo Z., Hohn T. 1993; Nonlinear ribosome migration on cauliflower mosaic virus 35S RNA. Cell 73:789–802
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallie D. R. 1993; Posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 44:77–105
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gallie D. R., Walbot V. 1992; Identification of the motifs within the tobacco mosaic virus 5′-leader responsible for enhancing translation. Nucleic Acids Research 20:4631–4638
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gallie D. R., Sleat D. E., Watts J. W., Turner P. C., Wilson T. M. 1987; The 5′-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Research 15:3257–3273
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Glimer D., Allmang C., Ehresmann C., Guilley H., Richards K., Jonard G., Ehresmann B. 1993; The secondary structure of the 5′-noncoding region of beet necrotic yellow vein virus RNA 3: evidence for a role in viral RNA replication. Nucleic Acids Research 21:1389–1395
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiebert E., McDonald J. G. 1973; Characterization of some proteins associated with viruses in the potato Y group. Virology 56:349–361
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackson R., Howell M. T., Kaminski A. 1990; The novel mechanism of initiation of picornavirus RNA translation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 15:477–483
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson R. A., Kavanaugh T. A., Bevan M. W. 1987; GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO Journal 6:3901–3907
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jobling S. A., Gehrke L. 1987; Enhanced translation of chimearic messenger RNAs containing a plant viral untranslated leader sequence. Nature; London: 325622–625
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jobling S. A., Cuthbert C. M., Rogers S. G., Fraley R. T., Gehrke L. 1988; In vitro transcription and translational efficiency of chimeric SP6 messenger RNAs devoid of 5′ vector nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Research 16:4483–4498
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Konarska M. M., Padgett R. A., Sharp P. A. 1984; Recognition of cap structure in splicing in vitro of mRNA precursors. Cell 38:731–736
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koromilas A. E., Lazaris-Karatzas A., Sonenberg N. 1992; mRNAs containing extensive secondary structure in their 5′ noncoding region translate efficiently in cells overexpressing initiation factor eIF-4E. EMBO Journal 11:4153–4158
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozak M. 1989a; The scanning model for translation; an update. Journal of Cell Biology 108:229–241
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kozak M. 1989b; Context effects and inefficient initiation at non- AUG codons in eukaryotic cell-free translation systems. Molecular and Cellular Biology 9:5134–5142
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lain S., Riechmann J. L., Garcia J. A. 1989; The complete nucleotide sequence of plum pox virus RNA. Virus Research 13:157–172
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Laliberté J. -F., Nicolas O., Chatel H., Lazure C., Morosoli R. 1992; Release of a 22-kDa protein derived from the amino- terminal domain of the 49-kDa NIa of turnip mosaic potyvirus in Escherichia coli. Virology 190:510–514
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levis C., Astier-Manifacier S. 1993; The 5′ untranslated region of PVY RNA, even located in an internal position, enables initiation of translation. Virus Genes 7:367–379
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Merrick W. C. 1992; Mechanism and regulation of eukaryotic protein synthesis. Microbiological Reviews 56:291–315
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicolaisen M., Johansen E., Poulsen G. B., Borkhardt B. 1992; The 5′ untranslated region from pea seedborne mosaic potyvirus RNA as a translational enhancer in pea and tobacco protoplasts. FEBS Letters 303:169–172
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicolas O., Laliberté J. -F. 1992; The complete nucleotide sequence of turnip mosaic potyvirus RNA. Journal of General Virology 73:2785–2793
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pelletier J., Sonenberg N. 1985; Insertion mutagenesis to increase secondary structure within the 5′ noncoding region of a eukaryotic mRNA reduces translational efficiency. Cell 40:515–526
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pelletier J., Sonenberg N. 1988; Internal initiation of translation of eukaryotic mRNA directed by a sequence derived from poliovirus RNA. Nature; London: 334320–325
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Riechmann J. L., Laín S., Garcia J. A. 1991; Identification of the initiation codon of plum pox potyvirus genomic RNA. Virology 185:544–552
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Riechmann J. L., Lain S., Garcia J. A. 1992; Highlights and prospects of potyvirus molecular biology. Journal of General Virology 73:1–16
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. 1989 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual New York: Cold Spring Harbor;
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Shattuck V. I., Brolley B., Stobbs L. W., Lougheed E. C. 1989; The effect of turnip mosaic virus infection on the mineral content and storability of field-grown rutabaga. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 20:581–595
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sleat D. E., Wilson T. M. 1992; Plant virus genomes as sources of novel functions for genetic manipulations. In Genetic Engineering with Plant Viruses pp. 55–113 Wilson T. M., Davies J. W. Edited by Boca Raton: CRC Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Thach R. E. 1992; Cap recap; the involvement of eIF-4F in regulating gene expression. Cell 68:177–180
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas A. A. M., Ter Haar E., Wellink J., Voorma H. O. 1991; Cowpea mosaic virus middle component RNA contains a sequence that allows internal binding of ribosomes and that requires eukaryotic initiation factor 4F for optimal translation. Journal of Virology 65:2953–2959
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Töpfer R., Schell J., Steinbiss H. -H. 1988; Versatile cloning vectors for transient expression and direct gene transfer in plant cells. Nucleic Acids Research 16:8725
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Turpen T. 1989; Molecular cloning of a potato virus Y genome: nucleotide sequence homology in non-coding regions of potyviruses. Journal of General Virology 70:1951–1960
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang C., Sarnow P., Siddiqui A. 1993; Translation of human hepatitis C virus RNA in culture cells is mediated by an internal ribosome-binding mechanism. Journal of Virology 67:3338–3344
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zuker M., Stiegler P. 1981; Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Research 9:133–148
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-75-11-3157
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error