1887

Abstract

We reported earlier that B95a, an Epstein-Barr virus-transformed marmoset B lymphoblastoid cell line, is more susceptible to infection with measles virus than other cells. The cell line also was found to be susceptible to infection with the lapinized Nakamura III (L) strain of rinderpest virus and various strains derived from it. The B95a cell line was therefore the only host cell system available for the propagation and quantification of the L strain. In contrast to the adaptation of the L strain to Vero cells which results in a diminution of virulence in rabbits, the propagation of the virus in B95a cells preserved the virulence and some other properties in rabbits. Furthermore, when Vero cell-adapted variants of the L strain with diminished virulence were serially passaged in B95a cells, virulence in rabbits was gradually regained.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-687
1991-03-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/72/3/JV0720030687.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-687&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ishii H., Yoshikawa Y., Yamanouchi K. 1986; Adaptation of the lapinized rinderpest virus to in vitro growth and attenuation of its virulence in rabbits. Journal of General Virology 67:275–280
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kobune F., Chino F., Yamanouchi K. 1976; Studies on recovery mechanism from rinderpest virus infection in rabbits. Japanese Journal of Medical Science and Biology 29:265–275
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kobune F., Sakata H., Sugiura A. 1990; Marmoset lymphoblastoid cells as a sensitive host for isolation of measles virus. Journal of Virology 64:700–705
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kurosawa S., Kobune F., Okuyama K., Sugiura A. 1987; Effects of antipyretics in rinderpest virus infection in rabbits. Journal of Infectious Diseases 155:991–997
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller G., Shope T., Lisco H., Lipman M. 1972; Epstein-Barr virus: transformation, cytopathic changes, and viral antigens in squirrel monkey and marmoset leukocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 69:383–389
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nakamura J., Miyamoto T. 1953; Avianization of lapinized rinderpest virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 14:307–317
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sato T. A., Fukuda A., Sugiura A. 1985; Characterization of major structural proteins of measles virus with monoclonal antibodies. Journal of General Virology 66:1397–1409
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shishido A., Yamanouchi K., Hikita M., Sato T., Fukuda A., Kobune F. 1976; Development of a cell culture system susceptible to measles, canine distemper, and rinderpest viruses. Archiu fur die gesamte Virusforschung 22:364–380
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sugiyama M., Minamoto N., Kinjo T., Hirayama N., Sasaki H., Yoshikawa Y., Yamanouchi K. 1989; Characterization of monoclonal anibodies against four structural proteins of rinderpest virus. Journal of General Virology 70:2605–2613
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yamanouchi K., Chino F., Kobune F., Yoshikawa Y. 1974; Pathogenesis of rinderpest virus infection in rabbits. Infection and Immunity 9:199–205
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-687
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-72-3-687
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error