Cross-neutralization assays were done using 85 strains of poliovirus type 1 with five groups of monoclonal antibodies. These strains were classified into 10 subgroups which had marked differences in antigenicity. Subgroups P1-2 (28%) and P1-5 (43%) were dominant and have been epidemic in China in recent years. These two subgroups were antigenically different from the Sabin-1 strain, but according to their responses to one group of monoclonal antibodies they had antigenic epitopes in common with the Mahoney and Brunhilde strains. Similarly, 91 strains of type 3 poliovirus were classified into six subgroups with another five groups of monoclonal antibodies. The results showed that strain P3/Yunnan/2/84, which was isolated from cases of poliomyelitis in a local epidemic in the Yunnan province of China in 1984, and strain P3/Finland/23127/84, which was isolated in Finland in 1984, were both antigenically different from the Sabin-3 strain and the reference virulent strain.
GuF-z., WangS-H., SunY-Y.1985; Application of ELISA for screening monoclonal antibodies against type 3 polioviruses and its antigenic analysis. Acta Academiae medicinae sinicae 7:359–363
GuoR.1980; Studies on new attenuated strains of type 3 live poliomyelitis vaccine. 1. Development of a new type 3 attenuated poliovirus. Chinese Medical Journal 93:583–588
MinorP. D., SchildG. C., FergusonM., MackayA., MagrathD. I., JohnA., YatesP. J., SpitzM.1982; Genetic and antigenic variation in type 3 polioviruses: characterization of strains by monoclonal antibodies and T1 oligonucleotide mapping. Journal of General Virology 61:167–176