Suppression of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Following Immunization with Anti-idiotypic Antibody: an Example of Split Tolerance
Intraperitoneal (i.p.) immunization with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) or an anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-id C) prepared against a monoclonal antibody specific for glycoprotein C of HSV-1, tolerizes mice for an HSV-1 delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response. This tolerization could be adoptively transferred to naive X- irradiated mice by splenic T cells, and was specific for HSV-1 DTH. Thus, DTH- tolerized mice responded to vaccinia virus or HSV-2 challenge, while remaining tolerized for HSV-1 DTH. In addition, these animals demonstrated a form of split tolerance such that HSV antibody, cytotoxic T cell and lymphoproliferative responses were detected in vitro. Thus, anti-id C induced a T cell population capable of specifically suppressing the HSV-1 DTH response, mimicking the effect of i.p. and intravenous immunization with HSV-1 found previously.
DreesmanG. R.,
KennedyR. C.1985; Anti-idiotypic antibodies: implications of internal image-based vaccines for infectious diseases. Journal of Infectious Diseases 151:761–765
EberleR.,
CourtneyR. J.1980; Preparation and characterization of specific antisera to individual glycoprotein antigens comprising the major glycoprotein region of herpes simplex virus type 1. Journal of Virology 35:902–917
ErtlH. C. J.,
FinbergR. W.1984; Sendai virus-specific T-cell clones: induction of cytolytic T cells by antiidiotypic antibody directed against a helper T-cell clone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A: 812850–2854
FieldsB. N.,
GreeneM. I.1982; Genetic and molecular mechanisms of viral pathogenesis: implications for prevention and treatment. Nature; London: 30019–23
GellP. G. H.,
MossP. A. H.1985; Production of cell-mediated immune response to herpes simplex virus by immunization with anti-idiotypic heteroantisera. Journal of General Virology 66:1801–1804
HayF. C.,
ThanavalaY.,
RoittI. M.1984; Idiotype vaccines. In Immune Intervention: New Trends in Vaccines1 pp 117–128RoittI. M.
Edited by London: Academic Press;
HorohovD. W.,
MooreR. N.,
RouseB. T.1985; Production of soluble suppressor factors by herpes simplex virus-stimulated splenocytes from herpes simplex virus immune mice. Journal of Virology 54:798–803
KennedyR. C.,
Adler-StorthzK.,
BurnsJ. W.,
HenkelR. D.,
DreesmanG. R.1984a; Anti-idiotypic modulation of herpes simplex virus infection leading to increased pathogenicity. Journal of Virology 50:951–953
LarsenH. S.,
FengM.,
HorohovD. M.,
MooreR. N.,
RouseB. T.1984; Role of T-lymphocyte subsets in recovery from herpes simplex virus infection. Journal of Virology 50:56–59
LatheyJ. L.,
RouseB. T.,
WileyD. E.,
CourtneyR. J.1986; Production and characterization of an antiidiotypic antibody specific for a monoclonal antibody to glycoprotein D of herpes simplex virus. Immunology 57:29–35
LatheyJ. L.,
CourtneyR. J.,
RouseB. T.1987; Production, binding characteristics, and immunogenicity of heterologous anti-idiotypic antibody to herpes simplex virus glycoprotein C. Viral Immunology in press
LawmanM. J. P.,
RouseB. T.,
CourtneyR. J.,
WalkerR. D.1980; Cell-mediated immunity against herpes simplex: induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Infection and Immunity 27:133–139
LeungK. N.,
AshmanR. B.,
ErtlH. C. G.,
AdaG. L.1980; Selective suppression of the cytotoxic T cell response to influenza virus in mice. European Journal of Immunology 10:803–810
MinamiM.,
OkudaK.,
FurusawaS.,
DortM. E.1983; Analysis of T cell hybridomas. IV. Characterization of inducible suppressor cell hybridoma. Journal of Experimental Medicine 157:1379–1395
MonroeJ. G.,
GurishM.,
DambrauskasJ.,
SlaouiM.,
LowyA.,
GreeneM. I.1985; Genetic and biological characterization of a T suppressor cell induced by anti-idiotypic antibody. Journal of Immunology 135:1589–1597
NashA. A.,
AshfordN. P. N.1982; Split T-cell tolerance in herpes simplex virus infected mice and its implication for anti-viral immunity. Immunology 45:761–766
RouseB. T.1984; The immunopathology of herpesvirus infections. In The Herpesviruses 4: Immunobiology of Human Herpesviruses, pp 103–119B.,
LopezC.
Edited by New York: Plenum Press;
SacksD. R.,
KelsoeG. H.,
SachsD. H.1983; Induction of immune response with anti-idiotypic antibodies: implications for the induction of protective immunity. Springer Seminars in Immunopathology 6:79
SchrierR. D.,
PizerL. I.,
MoorheadJ. W.1983; Tolerance and suppression of immunity to herpes simplex virus: different presentations of antigens induce different types of suppressor cells. Infection and Immunity 40:514–522
SyM.,
BachB. A.,
DohiY.,
NisonoffA.,
BenacerrafB.,
GreeneM. I.1979; Antigen and receptor driven regulatory mechanisms. I. Induction of suppressor T cells with anti-idiotypic antibodies. Journal of Experimental Medicine 150:1216
ThomasW. R.,
MorahanG.,
MillerJ. F. A. P.1983; Induction of suppressor T cells by monoclonal anti-idiotope antibody in strains of mice not expressing the idiotope in hyperimmune serum. Journal of Immunology 130:2079–2082
UytdehaagF. G. C. M.1985; Induction of neutralizing antibody in mice against poliovirus type II with monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibody. Journal of Immunology 134:1225–1229
Suppression of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Following Immunization with Anti-idiotypic Antibody: an Example of Split Tolerance