Relationships among Viruses in the Tombusvirus Group: Nucleic Acid Hybridization Studies Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

RNAs of definitive tombusviruses are about 4700 nucleotides in length; those of tentative members of the tombusvirus group, turnip crinkle virus (TCV) and glycine mottle virus (GMeV) are about 3900 nucleotides and those of saguaro cactus virus (SCV) and galinsoga mosaic virus (GMV) are about 3500 nucleotides. Hybridization with cDNA showed that there is some homology between the nucleic acids of different definitive tombusviruses. Analysis of the melting behaviour of heterologous cDNA:RNA hybrids suggests that different parts of the genome may be involved in hybrids between different combinations of tombusviruses. There is no homology between the nucleic acids of definitive tombusviruses and those of GMV, GMeV, SCV or TCV.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-66-7-1523
1985-07-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/66/7/JV0660071523.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-66-7-1523&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Behncken G. M., Dale J. L. 1984; Glycine mottle virus, a possible member of the tombusvirus group. Intervirology (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Behncken G. M., Francki R. I. B., Gibbs A. J. 1982; Galinsoga mosaic virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 252
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Britten R. J., Graham D. E., Neufeld B. R. 1971; Analysis of repeating DNA sequences by reassociation. Methods in Enzymology 29:363–418
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Broadbent L., Heathcote G. D. 1958; Properties and host range of turnip crinkle, rosette and yellow mosaic viruses. Annals of Applied Biology 46:586–592
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Covey S. N., Lomonossoff G. P., Hull R. 1981; Characterization of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA sequences which encode major polyadenylated transcripts. Nucleic Acids Research 9:6735–6747
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Di Franco A., Russo M., Martelli G. P. 1984; Ultrastructure and origin of cytoplasmic multivesicular bodies induced by carnation Italian ringspot virus. Journal of General Virology 65:1233–1237
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gallitelli D., Hull R. 1985; Characterization of satellite RNAs associated with tomato bushy stunt virus and five other definitive tombusviruses. Journal of General Virology 66:1533–1543
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gould A. R., Symons R. H. 1983; A molecular biological approach to relationships among viruses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 21:179–199
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hatta T., Francki R. I. B., Grivell C. J. 1983; Particle morphology and cytopathology of galinsoga mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology 64:687–692
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayes R. J., Buck K. W., Brunt A. A. 1984; Double-stranded and single-stranded subgenomic RNAs from plant tissue infected with tomato bushy stunt virus. Journal of General Virology 65:1239–1243
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hollings M., Stone M. O. 1965; Studies of pelargonium leaf curl virus. II. Relationships to tomato bushy stunt and other viruses. Annals of Applied Biology 56:87–98
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hollings M., Stone M. O. 1972; Turnip crinkle virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 109
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hollings M., Stone M. O. 1975; Serological and immunological relationships among viruses in the tombusvirus group. Annals of Applied Biology 80:37–40
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hollings M., Stone M. O. 1977; Cymbidium ringspot virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 178
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hollings M., Stone M. O., Bouttell G. C. 1970; Carnation Italian ringspot. Annals of Applied Biology 65:299–309
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kafatos F. C., Jones C. W., Efstratiadis A. 1979; Determination of nucleic acid sequence homologies and relative concentrations by a dot blot procedure. Nucleic Acids Research 6:1541–1552
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koenig R., Avgelis A. 1983; Identification of a virus similar to the BS3 strain of tomato bushy stunt virus in eggplants. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 106:349–353
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lovisolo O. 1957; Petunia: nuovo ospite naturale del virus del rachitismo cespuglioso del pomodoro. Bollettino della Stazione di patologia vegetale di Roma, Serie III 14:103–109
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lovisolo O., Ambrosino C., Liberatori J., Papa G. 1964; Ricerche sul virus del rachitismo cespuglioso del pomodoro (tomato bushy stunt virus). I. Differenziazione per via elettrocinetica ed immunochimica del ceppo ‘Petunia’ dal ceppo BS-3. Atti dell’Accademia delle scienze 92:301
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Makkouk K. M., Koenig R., Lesemann D. 1981; Characterization of a tombusvirus isolated from eggplant. Phytopathology 71:572–577
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Martelli G. P. 1981; Tombusviruses. In Handbook of Plant Virus Infections pp 61–90 Edited by Kurstak E. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland;
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Martelli G. P., Russo M. 1972; Ultrastructure of tomato bushy stunt strains in plant tissues. Mikrobiologia 9:177–185
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Martelli G. P., Quacquarelli A., Russo M. 1971; Tomato bushy stunt virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 69
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Martelli G. P., Russo M., Quacquarelli A. 1977; Tombusviruses (tomato bushy stunt virus group). In The Atlas of Insects and Plant Viruses pp 257–279 Edited by Maramorosch K. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Matthews R. E. F. 1982; Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Fourth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Intervirology 17:1–199
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maule A. J., Hull R., Donson J. 1983; The application of spot hybridization to the detection of DNA and RNA viruses in plant tissues. Journal of Virological Methods 6:215–224
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Meinkoth J., Wahl G. 1984; Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports. Analytical Biochemistry 138:267–284
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Milbraith G. M., Nelson M. R. 1972; Isolation and characterization of a virus from Saguaro cactus. Phytopathology 62:739–742
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nelson M. R., Yoshimura M. A., Tremaine J. H. 1975; Saguaro cactus virus. Commonwealth Mycological Institute/Association of Applied Biologists Descriptions of Plant Viruses No. 148
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Owens R. A., Diener T. O. 1981; Sensitive and rapid diagnosis of potato spindle tuber viroid disease by nucleic acid hybridization. Science 213:670–672
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Russo M., Martelli G. P. 1982; Ultrastructure of turnip crinkle and Saguaro cactus viruses in host tissues. Virology 118:109–116
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Russo M., Di Franco A., Martelli G. P. 1983; The fine structure of Cymbidium ringspot virus infections in host tissues. III. Role of peroxisomes in the genesis of multivesicular bodies. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 82:52–63
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith K. M. 1935; A new disease of the tomato. Annals of Applied Biology 22:731–741
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor J. M., Illmensee R., Summers J. 1976; Efficient transcription of RNA into DNA by avian sarcoma virus polymerase. Biochimica et biophysica acta 442:324–330
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas P. S. 1980; Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A 77:5201–5205
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas P. S. 1983; Hybridization of denatured RNA transferred or dotted to nitrocellulose paper. Methods in Enzymology 100:255–266
    [Google Scholar]
  37. White B. A., Bancroft F. C. 1982; Cytoplasmic dot hybridization. Simple analysis of relative mRNA levels in multiple small cell or tissue samples. Journal of Biological Chemistry 257:8569–8572
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-66-7-1523
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-66-7-1523
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed