1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

After digestion with trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, or chemical cleavage using CNBr, fragments of the tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus glycoprotein were isolated which retained their reactivity with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies defining a denaturation-resistant antigenic domain. Upon immunization of mice, these fragments induced antibodies reactive with the immunizing peptide, the denatured glycoprotein and the native glycoprotein as a constituent of the whole virus. The immune sera revealed the same properties as the monoclonal antibodies that were used to select the fragments for immunization: neutralizing activity; haemagglutination-inhibiting activity; blocking of the binding of antibodies used for selection; enhancement of the binding of other monoclonal antibodies defining a denaturation-sensitive antigenic domain. It was shown that the natural immune response against certain functionally important, denaturation-resistant immunogenic domains on the native protein can be closely mimicked by immunization with defined protein fragments. Antigenic sites present on these fragments may therefore represent essential constituents of a synthetic vaccine. The fine specificities of antibody populations in anti-peptide or anti-protein immune sera were analysed on the basis of single antigenic determinants by blocking assays using radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies that define eight distinct epitopes on the TBE virus glycoprotein. Quantitative differences in the blocking of certain monoclonal antibodies were also observed between human convalescent sera. The establishment of such blocking profiles using a panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies may represent a general method for dissecting the specificities of antibody populations present in polyclonal immune sera and could allow investigations on determinant-restricted differences of immune responses and its possible implications for the course of the disease.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-65-11-1921
1984-11-01
2022-01-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/65/11/JV0650111921.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-65-11-1921&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Atassi M. Z. 1980; Precise determination of protein antigenic structures has unravelled the molecular immune recognition of proteins and provided a prototype for synthetic mimicking of other protein binding sites. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 32:21–43
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berzofsky J. A., Buckenmayer O. K., Hicks G., Gurd F., Feldmann R. J., Minna J. 1982; Topographic antigenic determinants recognized by monoclonal antibodies to sperm whale myoglobin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 257:3189–3198
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breschkin A. M., Ahern J., White D. O. 1981; Antigenic determinants of influenza virus hemagglutinin. VIII. Topography of the antigenic regions of influenza virus hemagglutinin determined by competitive radioimmunoassay with monoclonal antibodies. Virology 113:130–140
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Burstin S. J., Spriggs D. R., Fields B. N. 1982; Evidence for functional domains on the reovirus type 3 hemagglutinin. Virology 117:146–155
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chanas A. C., Gould E. A., Clegg J. C. S., Varma M. G. R. 1982; Monoclonal antibodies to Sindbis glycoprotein E1 can neutralize, enhance infectivity, and independently inhibit haemagglutination or haemolysis. Journal of General Virology 58:37–46
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke D. H., Casals J. 1958; Techniques for hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7:561–573
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crumpton M. J. 1974; Protein antigens: the molecular basis of antigenicity and immunogenicity. In The Antigens vol II: pp 1–78 Edited by Sela M. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Green N., Alexander H., Olson A., Alexander S., Shinnick T. M., Sutcliffe J. G., Lerner R. A. 1982; Immunogenic structure of the influenza virus hemagglutinin. Cell 28:477–487
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Heinz F. X., Kunz C. H. 1981; Homogeneity of the structural glycoprotein from European isolates of tick-borne encephalitis virus: comparison with other flaviviruses. Journal of General Virology 57:263–274
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Heinz F. X., Tuma W., Kunz C. H. 1981; Antigenic and immunogenic properties of defined physical forms of tick-borne encephalitis virus structural proteins. Infection and Immunity 33:250–257
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Heinz F. X., Berger R., Tuma W., Kunz C. H. 1983a; A topological and functional model of epitopes on the structural glycoprotein of tick-borne encephalitis virus defined by monoclonal antibodies. Virology 126:525–537
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heinz F. X., Berger R., Tuma W., Kunz Ch. 1983b; Location of immunodominant antigenic determinants on fragments of the tick-borne encephalitis virus glycoprotein: evidence for two different mechanisms by which antibodies mediate neutralization and hemagglutination inhibition. Virology 130:485–501
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heinz F. X., Mandl C. H., Berger R., Tuma W., Kunz C. H. 1984; Antibody-induced conformational changes result in enhanced avidity of antibodies to different antigenic sites on the tick-borne encephalitis virus glycoprotein. Virology 133:25–34
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura-Kuroda J., Yasui K. 1983; Topographical analysis of antigenic determinants on envelope glycoprotein V3 (E) of Japanese encephalitis virus, using monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Virology 45:124–132
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laemmli U. K., Favre M. 1973; Maturation of the head of bacteriophage T4.1. DNA packaging events. Journal of Molecular Biology 80:575–599
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lefrancois L., Lyles D. S. 1982; The interaction of antibody with the major surface glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus. II. Monoclonal antibodies to non-neutralizing and cross-reactive epitopes of Indiana and New Jersey serotypes. Virology 121:168–174
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lubeck M., Gerhard W. 1982; Conformational changes at topologically distinct antigenic sites on the influenza A/PR/8/34 virus HA molecule are induced by the binding of monoclonal antibodies. Virology 118:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Maron E., Sher H. I., Mozes E., Arnon R., Sela M. 1973; Genetic control of immune response toward the loop region of lysozyme. Journal of Immunology 111:101–105
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Massey R. I., Schochetman G. 1981; Topographical analysis of viral epitopes using monoclonal antibodies: mechanisms of neutralization. Virology 115:20–32
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mathews J. H., Roehrig J. T. 1982; Determination of the protective epitopes on the glycoprotein of Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Immunology 129:2763–2767
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Milich D. R., Chisari F. V. 1982; Genetic regulation of the immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). I. H-2 Restriction of the murine humoral immune response to the a and d determinants of HBsAg. Journal of Immunology 129:320–325
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Milich D. R., Leroux-Roels G. G., Chisari F. V. 1983; Genetic regulation of the immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). II. Qualitative characteristics of the humoral immune response to the a, d, and y determinants of HBsAg. Journal of Immunology 130:1395–1400
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mozes E., Maron E., Arnon R., Sela M. 1971; Strain dependent differences in the specificity of antibody responses toward lysozyme. Journal of Immunology 106:862–864
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nowinski R. C., Pickering R., O’Donnell P. V., Pinter A., Hammerling U. 1981; Selective neutralization of ecotropic murine leukemia virus by monoclonal antibodies: location of a site on the gp 70 protein associated with ecotropism. Virology 111:84–92
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Porterfield J. S. 1980; Antigenic characteristic and classification of togaviridae. In The Togaviruses Biology, Structure, Replication pp 13–46 Edited by Schlesinger R. W. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tosi R., Tanigaki N., Sorrentino R., Accolla R., Corte G. 1981; Binding of one monoclonal antibody to human la molecules can be enhanced by a second monoclonal antibody. European Journal of Immunology 11:721–726
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. 1979; Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U. S. A 76:4350–4354
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Volk W. A., Snyder R. M., Benjamin D. C., Wagner R. R. 1982; Monoclonal antibodies to the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus: comparative neutralizing activity. Journal of Virology 42:220–227
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yewdell J. W., Gerhard W. 1982; Delineation of four antigenic sites on a paramyxovirus glycoprotein via which monoclonal antibodies mediate distinct antiviral activities. Journal of Immunology 128:2670–2675
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-65-11-1921
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-65-11-1921
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error