Comparative serological and nucleic acid studies were carried out on rotavirus isolates, with and without the original group antigen. Indirect immunofluorescence allowed the atypical isolates to be divided into two groups each with its own distinct group antigen hence giving a total of at least three distinct rotavirus groups. Genome profile analysis of the atypical isolates again divided them into two groups which corresponded with those obtained by immunofluorescence and within which the overall pattern of genome segments was similar. A more rigorous examination of the degree of difference between the three virus groups was carried out using single-dimension terminal fingerprint analysis. This indicated that the viruses in the three groups did not carry any genome segments in common with each other. Therefore, experimental criteria have been established which allow the division of rotaviruses into three groups. Analysis of further atypical isolates, as they become available, will establish whether the division of rotaviruses into a number of separate groups, of the type seen in influenza virus, is justified.
BridgerJ. C.1980; Detection by electron microscopy of caliciviruses, astroviruses and rotavirus-like particles in the faeces of piglets with diarrhoea. Veterinary Record 107:532–533
ClarkeI. N.,
McCraeM. A.1981a; A rapid and sensitive method for analysing the genome profiles of field isolates of rotavirus. Journal of Virological Methods 2:203–209
ClarkeI. N.,
McCraeM. A.1981b; A sensitive method for the production of diagnostic fingerprints of the genome segments of field isolates of rotavirus. Journal of Virological Methods 3:261–269
ClarkeI. N.,
McCraeM. A.1982; Structural analysis of electrophoretic variation in the genome profiles of rotavirus field isolates. Infection and Immunity 36:492–497
ClarkeI. N.,
McCraeM. A.1983; The molecular biology of rotaviruses. VI. RNA species-specific terminal conservation in rotaviruses. Journal of General Virology 64:1877–1884
FlewettT. H.,
BrydenA. S.,
DaviesH. A.,
WoodeG. N.,
BridgerJ. C.1974; Relation between viruses from acute gastroenteritis of children and new born calves. Lancet ii:61–63
McCraeM. A.,
Faulkner-ValleG. P.1981; The molecular biology of rotaviruses. I. Characterisation of the basic growth parameters and pattern of macromolecular synthesis. Journal of Virology 39:490–496
McCraeM. A.,
McCorquodaleJ. G.1982; The molecular biology of rotaviruses. II. Identification of the proteincoding assignments of calf rotavirus genome RNA species. Virology 117:435–443
McNultyM. S.,
AllanG. M.,
ToddD.,
McFerranJ. B.,
McCrackenR. M.1981; Isolation from chickens of a rotavirus lacking the rotavirus group antigen. Journal of General Virology 55:405–413
RodgerS. M.,
HolmesI. H.1979; Comparison of the genomes of simian, bovine and human rotaviruses by gel electrophoresis and detection of genomic variation among bovine isolates. Journal of Virology 30:839–846
SaifL. J.,
BohlE. H.,
ThielK. W.,
CrossR. F.,
HouseJ. A.1980; Rotavirus-like, calicivirus-like and 23 nm virus-like particles associated with diarrhoea in young pigs. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 12:105–111
SmithM. L.,
LazdinsI.,
HolmesI. H.1980; Coding assignments of double-stranded RNA segments of SA 11 rotavirus established by in vitro translation. Journal of Virology 33:976–982
WoodeG. N.,
BridgerJ. C.,
JonesJ. M.,
FlewettT. H.,
BrydenA. S.,
DaviesH. A.,
WhiteG. B. B.1976; Morphological and antigenic relationships between viruses (rotaviruses) from acute gastroenteritis of children, calves, piglets, mice and foals. Infection and Immunity 14:804–810