1887

Abstract

Conclusions

It is suggested that the adenovirus field should use Rosen’s group designation (I to IV) rather than that of the Huebner (1967) (A to D), which is based on the relationship of T-antigens within the group, since the two classifications correspond to each other (Table ) and Rosen’s proposal has the priority. As to types 20, 25 and 28, only the failure to agglutinate rat blood cells distinguishes them ffrom the other group II viruses, where as they differ form the group I viruses in the haemagglutinin properties, cytopathology, serologic relationship of virion and T-antigens and biochemical findings. In all of these properties types 20, 25 and 28 resemble group II viruses

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-6-2-325
1970-02-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-6-2-325
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error