1887

Abstract

Summary

DNA was extracted from nucleocapsids isolated from WI-38 cells infected with two different strains of varicella-zoster virus (VZV). The DNAs were treated with each of six restriction endonucleases (RI, dIII, I, II, I and HI) and small, but reproducible differences in restriction endonuclease patterns were observed. These strains were passaged in WI-38 cells and in primary guinea-pig embryo (GPE) cells, followed by restriction endonuclease analysis of the DNAs. No changes were observed in the restriction profile of the DNA of one of the strains (VZV-KMcC) after 46 passages in WI-38 cells but small differences were observed after 72 passages. No changes were observed after 30 passages of another strain (VZV-AW) in WI-38 cells. Twenty passages of VZB-KMcC in GPE cells did result in minor alterations of its DNA. It was concluded that VZV DNA was sufficiently stable after multiple passages in WI-38 cells to make restriction endonuclease analysis a valuable epidemiological tool for strain differentiation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-55-1-207
1981-07-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/55/1/JV0550010207.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-55-1-207&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Buchman T. G., Roizman B., Adams G., Stover B. H. 1978; Restriction endonuclease fingerprinting of herpes simplex virus DNA: a novel epidemiological tool applied to a nosocomial outbreak. Journal of Infectious Diseases 138:488–498
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fioretti A., Iwasaki Y., Furukawa T., Plotkin S. A. 1973; The growth of varicella-zoster virus in guinea-pig embryo cells. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 144:340–344
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayward G. S., Frenkel N., Roizman B. 1975; Anatomy of herpes simplex virus DNA: strain differences and heterogeneity in the locations of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72:1768–1772
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hirai K., Ikuta K., Kato S. 1979; Comparative studies on Marek’s disease virus with herpesvirus of turkeys DNA. Journal of General Virology 45:119–131
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kilpatrick B. A., Huang E. S., Pagano J. S. 1976; Analysis of cytomegalovirus with restriction endonucleases Hin dIII and Eco RI. Journal of Virology 18:1095–1105
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lonsdale D. M. 1979; A rapid technique for distinguishing herpes-simplex virus type 1 from type 2 by restriction-enzyme technology. Lancet 1:849–852
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Murray B. K., Biswal N., Bookout J. B., Lanford R. E., Courtney R. J., Melnick J. L. 1975; Cyclic appearance of defective interfering particles of herpes simplex virus and the concomitant accumulation of early polypeptide VP175. Intervirology 5:173–184
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Oakes J. E., Iltis J. P., Hyman R. W., Rapp F. 1977; Analysis by restriction enzyme cleavage of human varicella-zoster virus DNAs. Virology 82:353–361
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rapp F., Iltis J. P., Oakes J. E., Hyman R. W. 1977; A novel approach to study the DNA of herpes zoster virus. Intervirology 8:272–280
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Richards J. C., Hyman R. W., Rapp F. 1979; Analysis of the DNAs from seven varicella-zoster virus isolates. Journal of Virology 32:812–821
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Skare J., Summers W. C. 1977; Structure and function of herpesvirus genomes. II. Eco RI, Xba I, and Hin dIII endonuclease cleavage sites on herpes simplex virus type I DNA. Virology 76:581–595
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zweerink H. J., Neff B. J. 1981; Immune response after exposure to varicella zoster virus. Characterization of virus specific antibodies and their corresponding antigens. Infection and Immunity 31:436–444
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-55-1-207
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-55-1-207
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error