1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Evidence is presented supporting the hypothesis that reovirus intermediate subviral particles (ISVP), which show increased infectivity relative to intact virions, can gain entry into host L cells by two alternative pathways. One pathway is by the process of viropexis, involving phagocytic vacuoles. A second entry pathway is via direct penetration of the plasma membrane of the cell, without involvement of a phagocytic vacuole. Using electron microscopy, a kinetic analysis of the uptake process was carried out. Results indicate that at 37 °C ISVP gain entry into host cells primarily by direct entry, although viropexis also occurs, while intact virions gain entry by viropexis almost exclusively. A second line of experimental evidence consistent with the idea that ISVP can ‘melt’ their way through the plasma membrane is provided by studies on the release of pre-loaded radioactive Cr from host cells following infection. Cr release data demonstrate that infection with ISVP leads to an immediate increased leakiness of the cell plasma membrane, whereas no such increase takes place following infection with an equivalent number of intact virions. This demonstrates that ISVP can interact with the plasma membrane of the cell in a manner which is qualitatively different from the interaction between intact virions and the plasma membrane.

The ability of ISVP to directly penetrate the plasma membrane of the host cell, which intact virions apparently cannot do, could explain the decreased duration of the eclipse phase, as well as the increased infectivity of ISVP, relative to that observed for infection with intact virions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-45-1-161
1979-10-01
2022-10-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/45/1/JV0450010161.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-45-1-161&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Borsa J., Copps T. P., Sargent M. D., Long D. G., Chapman J. D. 1973a; New intermediate subviral particles in the in-vitro uncoating of reovirus virions by chymotrypsin. Journal of Virology 11:552–564
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borsa J., Sargent M. D., Copps T. P., Long D. G., Chapman J. D. 1973b; Specific monovalent cation effects on modification of reovirus infectivity by chymotrypsin digestion in-vitro. Journal of Virology 11:1017–1019
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borsa J., Sargent M. D., Long D. G., Chapman J. D. 1973c; Extraordinary effects of specific monovalent cations on activation of reovirus transcriptase by chymotrypsin in vitro. Journal of Virology 11:207–217
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borsa J., Long D. G., Sargent M. D., Copps T. P., Chapman J. D. 1974; Reovirus transcriptase activation in-vitro: involvement of an endogenous uncoating activity in the second stage of the process. Intervirology 4:171–188
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borsa J., Sargent M. D., Lievaart P. A. 1979; Reovirus: demonstration of a second step in the intracellular uncoating and transcriptase activation process. (in preparation)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown D. T., Burlingham B. T. 1973; Penetration of host cell membranes by adenovirus-2. Journal of Virology 12:386–396
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chelack W. S., Petkau A., Copps T. P. 1972; Permeability of a model lipid membrane to T4. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 274:28–37
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cox D. C., Clinkscales C. W. 1976; Infectious reovirus subviral particles: virus replication, cellular cytopathology, and DNA synthesis. Virology 74:259–261
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunnebecke J. H., Levinthal J. D., Williams R. C. 1969; Entry and release of poliovirus as observed by electron microscopy of cultured cells. Journal of Virology 4:505–513
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayat M. A. 1972 In Basic Electron Microscopy Techniques chapter 6, pp 63–64 New York, Cincinnati, Toronto, London, Melbourne: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan E., Rosenkranz H. S., Mednis B. 1969; Structure and development of viruses as observed in the electron microscope. X. Entry and uncoating of adenovirus. Journal of Virology 4:777–799
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Petkau A., Chelack W. S. 1967; Permeability of a thin phospholipid membrane to ions and tobacco mosaic virus. Biochimica et Biophyslca Acta 135:812–824
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Petkau A., Parker W. L. 1967; Permeability of a thin phospholipid membrane to coxsackie B2 virus. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 135:825–830
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Silverstein S. C., Dales S. 1968; The penetration of reovirus RNA and initiation of its genetic function in L-strain fibroblasts. Journal of Cell Biology 36:197–230
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Spendlove R. S., Schaffer F. L. 1965; Enzymatic enhancement of infectivity of reovirus. Journal of Bacteriology 89:597–602
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Spendlove R. S., Mcclain M. E., Lennettee E. H. 1970; Enhancement of reovirus infectivity by extracellular removal or alteration of the virus capsid by proteolytic enzymes. Journal of General Virology 8:83–94
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wallis C., Melnick J. L., Rapp F. 1966; Effects of pancreatin on the growth of reovirus. Journal of Bacteriology 92:155–160
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-45-1-161
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-45-1-161
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error