One of the most critical factors for the infection of barley protoplasts with brome mosaic virus (BMV) RNA was the osmotic strength of the medium during protoplast isolation and inoculation. Infection was most efficient when protoplasts were isolated and inoculated in 0·5 m-mannitol and then washed with 0·7 m-mannitol; less infection occurred when the protoplasts were isolated in 0·5 or 0·7 m-mannitol and inoculated and washed in 0·7 m-mannitol. Other conditions optimal for infection were inoculum containing 1 μg/ml BMV RNA or less, 1 μg/ml poly-l-ornithine, 20 mm-potassium citrate buffer at pH 4·7 and 0·5 mm-CaCl2, and inoculation at 0 °C. Up to 90% of protoplasts were infected in these conditions. Osmotic shock produced by increase of mannitol concentration immediately before inoculation induced invagination suggestive of pinocytosis, and this seemed to be associated with efficient infection of barley protoplasts with BMV. The discrepancy between the effect of this osmotic shock on the infection of barley protoplasts with BMV and its RNA, and the mechanism of infection are discussed.
AlblasI.,
BolJ. F.1977; Factors influencing the infection of cowpea mesophyll protoplasts by alfalfa mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology 36:175–185
HirukiC.1969; Properties of single- and double-stranded ribonucleic acid from barley plants infected with bromegrass mosaic virus. Journal of Virology 3:498–505
KuboS.,
RobinsonD. J.,
HarrisonB. D.,
HutchesonA. M.1976; Uptake of tobacco rattle virus by tobacco protoplasts, and the effect of phosphate on infection. Journal of General Virology 30:287–298
MotoyoshiF.,
BancroftJ. B.,
WaitsJ. W.,
BurgessJ.1973; The infection of tobacco protoplasts with cowpea chlorotic mottle virus and its RNA. Journal of General Virology 20:177–193
MotoyoshiF.,
BancroftJ. B.,
WattsJ. W.1974a; The infection of tobacco protoplasts with a variant of brome mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology 25:31–36
MotoyoshiF.,
WattsJ. W.,
BancroftJ. B.1974b; Factors influencing the infection of tobacco protoplasts by cowpea chlorotic mottle virus. Journal of General Virology 25:245–256
OkunoT.,
FurusawaI.1978b; The use of osmotic shock for the inoculation of barley protoplasts with brome mosaic virus. Journal of General Virology 39:187–190
OkunoT.,
MikiT.,
FurusawaI.1975; Infection and multiplication of bromegrass mosaic virus in barley mesophyll protoplasts. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan (Abstract in Japanese) 41:293–294
PremeczG.,
OlàhT.,
GulyàsA.,
NytraiÀ.,
PalfiG.,
FarkasG. L.1977; Is the increase in ribo- nuclease level in isolated tobacco protoplasts due to osmotic shock?. Plant Science letters 9:195–200
SarkarS.,
UpadhyaM. D.,
MelchersG.1974; A highly efficient method of inoculation of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts with ribonucleic acid of tobacco mosaic virus. Molecular and General Genetics 135:1–9
SawhneyR. K.,
AdamsW. R. J.,
TsangJ.,
GalstonA. W.1977; Leaf pretreatment with senescence retardant as a basis for oat protoplast improvement. Plant & Cell Physiology 18:1309–1317
TakebeI.1977; Protoplasts in the study of plant virus replication. In Comprehensive Virologyxi237–283Fraenkel-ConratH.,
WagnerR. R.
New York: Plenum Press;