1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Cultures of human fibroblasts trisomic for chromosome 21 were more sensitive to human leukocyte and human fibroblast interferons than were human diploid fibroblasts; these in turn were more sensitive than fibroblasts monosomic for chromosome 21. The sensitivities of these cells to human interferons correlated with the amounts of interferons which they bound. These data indicate that some gene on chromosome 21 codes for an interferon-receptor component.

Also, interferon from a heterologous species (mouse) was respectively much more and somewhat more active in trisomic and disomic cells than in monosomic cells. These data suggest that heterologous and homologous interferons may share common receptor component(s) coded by chromosome 21. Alternatively, human chromosome 21 may carry genetic information for some factor(s) responsible for increasing the exposure of certain surface receptors which are themselves coded by other chromosomes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-37-3-629
1977-12-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/37/3/JV0370030629.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-37-3-629&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Berman B., Vilcek J. 1974; Cellular binding characteristics of human interferon. Virology 57:378–386
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodo G., Palese P., Lindner J. 1971; Activity of mouse interferon in human cells. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 137:1392–1395
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chany C., Vignal M., Couillin P., van Cong N., Bové J., Bové A. 1975; Chromosomal localization of human genes governing the interferon-induced antiviral state. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72:3129–3133
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davey M. W., Sulkowski E., Carter W. A. 1976; Purification and characterization of mouse interferon with novel affinity sorbents. Journal of Virology 17:439–445
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Clercq E., Edy V. G., Cassiman J. J. 1975; Non-antiviral activities of interferon are not controlled by chromosome 21. Nature, London 256:132–133
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Clercq E., Edy V. G., Cassiman J. J. 1976; Chromosome 21 does not code for an interferon receptor. Nature, London 24:249–251
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Epstein L. B., Epstein C. J. 1976; Localization of the gene AVG for the antiviral expression of immune and classical interferon to the distal portion of the long arm of chromosome 21. Journal of Infectious Diseases 133:A56–A61
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gresser I., Bandu M. T., Brouty-Boyé D. 1974; Interferon and cell division. IX. Interferon-resistant L1210 cells: characteristics and origin. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 52:553–559
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Havell E. A., Vilcek J. 1972; Production of high-titered interferon in cultures of human diploid cells. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2:476–484
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Knight E. Jun 1975; Heterogeneity of purified mouse interferon. Journal of Biological Chemistry 250:4139–4144
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Revel M., Bash D., Ruddle F. H. 1976; Antibodies to a cell-surface component coded by human chromosome 21 inhibit action of interferon. Nature, London 260:139–140
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stewart W. E. II 1974; Distinct molecular species of interferon. Virology 61:80–86
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stewart W. E. II 1975; Uptake of interferon: the fate of cell-bound interferon during induction of antiviral and non-antiviral activities. In Effects of Interferon on Cells, Viruses and the Immune System pp 75–98 Edited by Geraldes A. New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stewart W. E. II, De Clercq E., Billiau A., Desmyter J., De Somer P. 1972b; Increased susceptibility of cells treated with interferon to the toxicity of polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 69:1851–1854
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stewart W. E. II, De Clercq E., De Somer P. 1972a; Recovery of cell-bound interferon. Journal of Virology 10:707–712
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart W. E. II, Desmyter J. 1975; Molecular heterogeneity of human leukocyte interferon: two populations differing in molecular weights, requirements for renaturation, and cross-species antiviral activity. Virology 67:68–77
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart W. E. II, Gresser I., Tovey M. G., Bandu M. T., Le Goff S. 1976; Identification of the cell-multiplication-inhibitory factors in interferon preparations as interferons. Nature, London 262:300–302
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tan Y. H. 1975; Chromosome-21-dosage effect on induction of antiviral gene(s). Nature, London 253:280–282
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tan Y. H. 1976; Chromosome-21 and the cell growth inhibitory effect of human interferon preparations. Nature, London 260:141–143
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tan Y. H., Schneider E. L., Tischfield J., Epstein C. J., Ruddle F. H. 1974; Human chromosome 21 dosage: effect on the expression of the interferon induced antiviral state. Science 186:61–63
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tan Y. H., Tischfield J., Ruddle F. H. 1973; The linkage of genes for the human interferon-induced antiviral protein and indophenol oxidase-B traits to chromosome G-21. Journal of Experimental Medicine 137:317–330
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Umino Y., Kohno S. 1976; Binding and interspecies specificity of two rodent interferons. International Research Communications in Medical Science 4:138
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Werenne J., Rousseau G. 1976; Studies of leukemia L1210 cells in culture: a comparison of clones differing in sensitivity to interferon. Archives Internationales de Physiologie et Biochimie 84683–684
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-37-3-629
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-37-3-629
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error