1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

The segregation of resistant and susceptible phenotypes in response to infection by RSV(RAV 2), RSV(RAV 50) and RSV(RAV 0), of avian RNA tumour virus subgroups B, D and E, respectively, was analysed in several test-crosses using chickens from the RPRL line 7-2, HPRS-synthetic line E and the Rease-heath line C. The results were fully consistent with our view reported previously that the genes at the and loci segregate independently and recombine under the Mendelian second law of independent assortment. The dominant susceptibility gene is expressed phenotypically when associated with the dominant susceptibility gene, but its expression is suppressed when associated with two doses of the recessive resistance gene. Genetic causes such as lack of penetration, recessive epistasis, and/or complementary interaction between the and genes have been discussed to account for the modified phenotypic expression of cells, i.e. resistance to subgroup E virus.

Also, as reported previously, it was observed in this study that the genes control the cellular response to subgroup D virus.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-32-3-441
1976-09-01
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/32/3/JV0320030441.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-32-3-441&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CRITTENDEN L. B., MOTTA J. V.1975The role of the [i]tvb[/i] locus in genetic resistance to RSV(RAVO)Virology67:327–334
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CRITTENDEN L. B., WENDEL E. J., MOTTA J. V.1973Interaction of genes controlling resistance to RSV (RAV 0)Virology52:373–384
    [Google Scholar]
  3. FALCONER D. S.1960Introduction to Quantitative Geneticschap. 469–84New York: The Ronald Press Co
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LI C. C.1968Population GeneticsSixth Impression, chap11127–143Chicago and LondonThe University of Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LUSH J. L.1948The Genetics of Populations (Mimeo Book)Iowa State CollegeAmerica
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MATHER K.1949Statistical Analysis in Biologychap. 10174–202LondonMethuen and Co. Ltd
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PANI P. K.1974Studies in genetic resistance to RSV (RAV 0): a third type of genetic resistance typified by the W line of fowl and further support of the two loci genetic modelJournal of General Virology23:33–40
    [Google Scholar]
  8. PANI P. K.1975aGenetic control of resistance of chick embryo cultures to RSV(RAV 50)Journal of General Virology27:163–172
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PANI P. K.1975bGenetic susceptibiiity of chicken × quail hybrid embryos to avian RNA tumour virusesJournal of General Virology28:159–163
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PANI P. K., PAYNE L. N.1973Further evidence for two loci which control susceptibility of fowl to RSV(RAV 0)Journal of General Virology19:235–244
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PAYNE L. N., BIGGS P. M.1966Genetic basis of cellular susceptibility to Schmidt-Ruppin and Harris strains of Rous sarcoma virusVirology29:190–198
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PAYNE L. N., PANI P. K., WEISS R. A.1971A dominant epistatic gene which inhibits cellular susceptibility to RSV(RAV 0)Journal of General Virology13:455–462
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SINNOT W. E., DUNN L. C., DOBZHANSKY TH.1950Principles of Geneticschapter 5fourth editionLondonMcGraw-Hill Book Company
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TEMIN H. M., RUBIN H.1958Characteristics of an assay to Rous sarcoma virus and Rous sarcoma cells in tissue cultureVirology6:669–668
    [Google Scholar]
  15. TOOZE J.1973The Molecular Biology of Tumour Viruseschapter 10Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WEISS R. A.1971Helper viruses and helper cellsProceedings of Symposium on RNA viruses and host genome in oncogenesis117–135Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-32-3-441
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-32-3-441
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error