Transfection of Chicken Fibroblasts with Single Exposure to DNA from Virogenic Mammalian Cells Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

The efficiency of the transfection of chicken fibroblasts with a single dose (1.5 to 150 µg) of DNA isolated from virogenic RSV (Prague strain) transformed XC cells was increased if chicken fibroblasts were pre-treated with BUdR. Mitomycin or u.v. irradiation in doses used were not efficient. The repeated attempts to transfect duck fibroblasts, not containing activable endogenous chicken virus genome or group-specific antigen, always failed.

Both DNA isolated from purified nuclei and whole virogenic cells exerted the same transfecting activity.

Transfecting activity was present in the peak fractions obtained after CsCl gradient sedimentation of DNA obtained from virogenic cells, was absent in RNA preparations and after digestion of DNA with DNase or alkaline denaturation. This indicates that DNA is responsible for transfection. The role of endogenous virus genomes in transfection is discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-21-1-47
1973-10-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/21/1/JV0210010047.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-21-1-47&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baltimore D. 1970; RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of RNA tumor viruses. Nature, London 226:1209–1211
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boling M. E., Setlow J. K., Allison D. P. 1972; Bacteriophage of Haemophilus influenzae. 1. Differences between infection by whole phageextracted phage DNA and prophage DNA extracted from lysogenic cells. Journal of Molecular Biology 63:335–348
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunk C. F., Leick V. 1969; Rapid equilibrium isopycnic CsCl gradients. Biochimica et biophysica acta 179:136–144
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ceriotti G. 1955; Determination of nucleic acids in animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 214:59–70
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dulbecco R., Vogt M. 1954; Plaque formation and isolation of pure lines with poliomyelitis viruses. Journal of Experimental Medicine 99:167–182
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Halsall H. B., Searcy D. G., Schumaker V. N. 1971; Characterization of zonal fractions of calf thymus DNA. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 145:23–235
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill M., Hillová J. 1971; Production virale dans les fibroblastes de poule traités par l′acide désoxyribonucléique de cellules XC de rat transformées par le virus deRous. Compte rendu deľ Académie des sciences, Paris 272:3094–3097
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hill M., Hillová J. 1972; Virus recovery in chicken cells tested with Rous sarcoma cell DNA. Nature New Biology 237:35–39
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hložánek I., Donner L., Svoboda J. 1966; Malignant transformation in vitro of Chinese hamster embryonic fibroblasts with the Schmidt-Ruppin strain of Rous sarcoma virus and karyological analysis of this process. Journal of Cellular Physiology 68:221–236
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hložánek I., Svoboda J. 1972; Characterization of viruses obtained after cell fusion or transfection of chicken cells with DNA from virogenic mammalian Rous sarcoma cells. Journal of General Virology 17:55–59
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Klement V., Nicolson M. O., Huebner R. J. 1971; Rescue of genome of focus forming virus from rat non-productive lines by 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Nature New Biology 234:12–14
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lowy D. R., Rowe W. P., Teich N., Hartley J. W. 1971; Murine leukemia virus: High-frequency activation in vitro by 5-iododeoxyuridine and 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Science, New York 174:155–156
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Marmur J. 1963; A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. In Methods in Enzymology vol VI pp 726–738 Edited by Colowick S. P., Kaplan N. O. New York and London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Montagnier L., Vigier P. 1972; Un intermédiate ADN infectieux et transformant du virus de sarcome de Rous dans les cellules de poule transformees par ce virus. Compte rendu deľ Académie des sciences, Paris 224:1977–1980
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Okubo S., Strauss M., Stodolski M. 1964; The possible role of recombination in the infection of competent Bacillus subtilis by bacteriophage deoxyribonucleic acid. Virology 24:552–562
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Opara-Kubinska Z., Kurylo-Borowska Z., Szybalski W. 1963; Genetic transformation studies. III. Effect of ultraviolet light on the molecular properties of normal and halogenated deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochimica et biophysica acta 72:298–309
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Říman J., Beaudreau G. S. 1970; Viral DNA-dependent DNA polymerase and the properties of thymidine labelled material to virions of an oncogenic RNA virus. Nature, London 228:427–430
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Šimkovič D., Svoboda J., Valentová N. 1963; Clonal analysis of line XCtc rat tumour cells (derived from tumour XC) grown in vitro. Folia biologica, Praha 9:82–91
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Somers C. E., Hsu T. C. 1962; Chromosome damage induced by hydroxylamine in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 48:937–943
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Svoboda J. 1960; Presence of chicken tumour virus in the sarcoma of the adult rat inoculated after birth with Rous sarcoma tissue. Nature, London 186:980–981
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Svoboda J. 1961; The tumorigenic action of Rous sarcoma in rats and the permanent product ion of Rous virus by the induced rat sarcoma XC. Folia biologica, Praha 7:46–60
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Svoboda J. 1964; Malignant interaction of Rous virus with mammalian cells in vivo and in vitro. National Cancer Institute monograph 17:277–298
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Svoboda J., Chýle P., Šimkovič D., Hilgert L. 1963; Demonstration of the absence of infectious Rous virus in rat tumour XC, whose structurally intact cells produce Rous sarcomas when transferred to chicks. Folia biologica, Praha 9:77–81
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Svoboda J., Hložánek I. 1970; Role of cell association in virus infection and virus rescue. Advances in Cancer Research 13:217–562
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Svoboda J., Hložánek I., Mach O. 1972; Detection of chicken sarcoma virus after transfection of chicken fibroblasts with DNA isolated from mammalian cells transformed with Rous virus. Folia biologica, Praha 18:149–153
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Svoboda J., Machala O., Hložánek I. 1967; Influence of Sendai virus on RSV formation in mixed culture of virogenic mammalian cells and chicken fibroblasts. Folia biologica, Praha 13:155–157
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Szybalski W. 1968; Equilibrium sedimentation of viruses, nucleic acids and other macromolecules in density gradients in fractions. Publication of Spinco Division of Beckman Instruments Inc., Palo Alto, California 1:1–25
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Temin H. M. 1963; The effect of actinomycin D on growth of Rous sarcoma virus in vitro. Virology 20:577–582
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Temin H., Mizutani S. 1970; RNA-dependent DNA polymerase in virions of Rous sarcoma virus. Nature, London 226:1211–1213
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Temin H. M., Rubin H. 1958; Characteristics of an assay for Rous sarcoma virus and Rous sarcoma cells in tissue culture. Virology 6:669–688
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Trávníček M., Vepřek L., Říman J. 1967; RNA with high template activity from leukaemic myeloblasts (BAI strain A virus-induced avian myeloblastosis). I. Optimal conditions for its isolation and activity in the subcellular protein-synthesizing system. International Journal of Cancer 2:448–462
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vigier P. 1967; Persistence de génome du virus de Rous dans des cellules du hamster converties in vitro, et action du virus Sendai inactivé sur sa transmission aux cellules de poule. Compte rendu deľ Académie des sciences, Paris 264:422
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Weiss R. A., Friis R. R., Katz E., Vogt P. K. 1971; Induction of avian tumour viruses in normal cells by physical and chemical carcinogens. Virology 46:920
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Weiss R. A. 1972; Helper viruses and helper cells in RNA viruses and host genome in oncogenesis. In RNA Viruses and Host Genome in Oncogenesis pp 117–135 Edited by Emmelot P., Bentvelzen P. Amsterdam: North Holland;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-21-1-47
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-21-1-47
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed