The Sedimentation of Influenza Virus and its RNA in Sucrose Density Gradients Free

Abstract

SUMMARY

In 15 to 60% sucrose density gradients the distribution of standard preparations of influenza viruses measured by haemagglutination or infectivity was always bimodal. Approximately 17% of virus particles sedimented in a diffuse leading peak (fraction 1), while the rest was confined to a second homogeneous peak (fraction 2). Virus particles comprising fraction 1 were less dense (1·250 g./cm.) than those of fraction 2 (1·257 g./cm.).

RNA labelled with P was extracted by phenol+sodium dodecyl sulphate from four strains of influenza A virus (8, , 2//1/57 and fowl plague) and from one strain of influenza B virus (). The sedimentation characteristics of each preparation of RNA on sucrose density gradients varied under different conditions of ionic strength. In the presence of 0·1 -NaCl+0·001 -EDTA, RNA from fraction 2 could be resolved into at least two species. The predominant species had a sedimentation coefficient of 18 to 21 and (with the exception of the 2 RNA) about 10 to 15% of the total RNA sedimented as a diffuse band with a sedimentation coefficient of 32 to 42 . The and strains contained a third species of RNA, with a sedimentation coefficient of 7 to 9 . In 0·005 -EDTA without NaCl the RNA from fraction 2 (8) sedimented principally as a 14 component, and the 32 to 42 component was not found. Fraction 1 virus particles also contained several RNA components when analysed under conditions of high ionic strength. A 7 to 9 RNA species was found in amounts equal to, or greater than, the 18 to 21 RNA component, together with a small amount of ‘38’ RNA. In the presence of 0·005 -EDTA the 38 component was not found, but three components with sedimentation coefficients of 16 , 9 and 5 were present in approximately equivalent amounts. From these findings it is concluded that the RNA of influenza viruses consists largely of 18 molecules, under defined conditions of ionic strength, and that the 32 to 42 component is an artifact caused by aggregation. It is further concluded that sucrose gradients containing 0·1 -NaCl are unsatisfactory for studying the sedimentation characteristics of influenza RNA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-2-1-59
1968-01-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/2/1/JV0020010059.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-2-1-59&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ada G. L., Perry B. T. 1954; The nucleic acid content of influenza virus. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci 32:453
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agrawal H. O., Bruening G. 1966; Isolation of high molecular-weight 32P-labelled influenza virus ribonucleic acid. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci., U.S.A 55:818
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry R. D. 1960; Equilibrium sedimentation of influenza virus in caesium chloride density gradients. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci 38:499
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry R. D. 1961; The multiplication of influenza virus. I. The formation of incomplete virus. Virology 14:389
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boedtker H. 1960; Configurational properties of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. J. molec. Biol 2:171
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bramwell M. E., Harris H. 1967; The origin of the polydispersity in sedimentation patterns of rapidly labelled nuclear RNA. Biochem. J 103:816
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bray G. A. 1960; A simple, efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillation counter. Anal. Biochem 1:279
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies P., Barry R. D. 1966; Nucleic acid of influenza virus. Nature; Lond: 211384
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Duesberg P.H, Robinson W. S. 1967; On the structure and replication of influenza virus. J. molec. Biol 25:383
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellem K. A. O., Colter J. S. 1961; The interaction of infectious ribonucleic acids with mammalian cells. HI. Comparison of infection and ribonucleic acid uptake in the HeLa cell-polio ribonucleic acid and L cell-Mengo ribonucleic acid systems. Virology 15:113
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fazekas de St Groth S., Graham D. M. 1955; The production of incomplete virus particles among influenza strains: chemical induction of the von Magnus phenomenon. Br. J. exp. Path 36:205
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fazekas de St Groth S., White D. O. 1958; An improved assay for the infectivity of influenza viruses. J. Hyg., Camb 56:151
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Frisch-Niggemeyer W. 1959; The internal structure of influenza virus. Z. Naturf 14b:168
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Littauer U. Z., Eisenberg H. 1959; Ribonucleic acid from Escherichia coli. Preparation, characterization and physical properties. Biochim. biophys. Acta 32:320
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin R. G., Ames B. N. 1961; A method for determining the sedimentation behaviour of enzymes: application to protein mixtures. J. biol. Chem 236:1372
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pons M. 1967; Studies on influenza virus ribonucleic acid. Virology 31:523
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Reed L. J., Muench H. 1938; A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg 27:493
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schäfer W. 1963; Structure of some animal viruses and significance of their components. Bact. Rev 27:1
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sokol F., Schramek S., Sponar J. 1963; Comparison of different preparations of influenza virus ribonucleic acid. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun 12:21
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Spirin A. S. 1963; Some problems concerning the macromolecular structure of ribonucleic acids. Prog, nucleic acid Res 1:301
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-2-1-59
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-2-1-59
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed