1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Extracellular rabbitpox virus released naturally from infected cells differed antigenically from intracellular virus released by artificial disruption of cells. Intracellular virus was neutralized by antiserum prepared against live rabbitpox virus and by antiserum against inactivated vaccinia virus. In contrast, extracellular virus was neutralized only by rabbitpox antiserum. The antibodies responsible for the neutralization of intracellular and extracellular virus could be absorbed separately from rabbitpox antiserum. Morphologically, extracellular virus differed from intracellular virus in possessing an outer envelope. This envelope was probably the site of the virus antigen characteristic of extracellular virus, and fluorescent antibody staining of infected cells suggested that it was derived from the modified host cell membrane. Antibody directed against extracellular virus was responsible for the ability of rabbitpox antiserum to control the spread of rabbitpox virus in tissue culture and probably for its ability to protect rabbits from rabbitpox infection. Extracellular virus should therefore be used as the test virus in titrations of neutralizing antibody if these are to assess the protective activity of an antiserum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-1-9
1971-10-01
2022-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/13/1/JV0130010009.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-1-9&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Anderson S. G., Skegg J. 1970; The international standard for smallpox antiserum. Bulletin of the WorId Health Organisation 42:515
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Appleyard G., Westwood J. C. N. 1964; The growth of rabbitpox virus in tissue culture. Journal of General Microbiology 37:391
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulter E. A. 1969; Protection against poxviruses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 62:295
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulter E. A., Westwood J. C. N., Maber H. B. 1961; Value of serotherapy in a virus disease (rabbitpox). Lancet ii:1012
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulter E. A., Zwartouw H. T., Titmuss D. H. J., Maber H. B. 1971; Nature of the immune stateproduced by inactivated vaccinia virus in rabbits. American Journal of Epidemiology (In the Press.)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kempe C. H. 1960; Studies on smallpox and complications of smallpox vaccination. Paediatrics 26:176
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Peirce E. R., Melville F. S., Downie A. W., Duckworth M. J. 1958; Anti-vaccinial gamma-globulin in smallpox prophylaxis. Lancet ii:635
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Turner G. S., Squires E. J. 1971; Inactivated smallpox vaccine: immunogenicity of inactivated intracellular and extracellular vaccinia virus. Journal of General Virology 13:19
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zwartouw H. T., Westwood J. C. N., Appleyard G. 1962; Purification of poxviruses by density gradient centrifugation. Journal of General Microbiology 29:523
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-1-9
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-13-1-9
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error