1887

Abstract

Summary

Sixty-four single plaque subclones of a small-plaque-forming mutant of encephalomyocarditis virus, EMC/r, were isolated and titrated. In addition to EMC/r virus, some contained large-plaque-forming virus, EMC/r. The selective conditions which prevailed during the growth and isolation of the subclones were analysed in detail. All the evidence suggests that only negligible differential selection favouring either the parental (EMC/r) or the newly arisen plaque type (EMC/r) could have taken place. The changing selective conditions which operate during the growth of EMC/r mutants arising during the plaque assay of EMC/r, and which slow down their emergence, are discussed. The changes in plaque morphology were shown to be genetically determined. For estimation of the mutation rate the subclones were placed into one of three groups according to their total virus (infectivity) content. The mutation rate from r → r was calculated by four methods from each of the 3 groups and found to be 1–2 × 10 per particle per duplication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-1-1-81
1967-01-01
2022-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/1/1/JV0010010081.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-1-1-81&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Breeze D. C. 1964 Studies on Encephalomyocarditis Virus Ph.D. Thesis University of Glasgow, Scotland:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breeze D. C. 1967; Comparative growth and selection of small plaque and large plaque encephalomyocarditis virus in the absence of inhibitors from agar. J. gen. Virol 1:71
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carp R. I. 1963; A study of the mutation rates of several poliovirus strains to the reproductive capacity temperature/40+ and guanidine marker characteristics. Virology 21:373
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dulbecco R., Vogt M. 1958; Study of the mutability of d lines of polioviruses. Virology 5:220
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lea D. E., Coulson C. A. 1949; The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations. J. Genet 49:264
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ledinko N., Hirst G. K. 1961; Mixed infection of HeLa cells with polioviruses types 1 and 2. Virology 14:207
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liebhaber H., Takemoto K. K. 1963; The basis for the size differences in plaques produced by variants of encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus. Virology 20:559
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Luria S. E., Delbrück M. 1943; Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Medill-Brown M., Briody B. A. 1955; Mutation and selection pressure during adaptation of influenza virus to mice. Virology 1:301
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Takemori N., Nomura S. 1960; Mutation of polioviruses with respect to size of plaque. II. Reverse mutation of minute plaque mutant. Virology 12:171
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wallis C., Melnick J. L. 1963; Photodynamic inactivation of poliovirus. Virology 21:332
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson J. N., Cooper P. D. 1963; Aspects of the growth of poliovirus as revealed by the photodynamic effects of neutral red and acridine orange. Virology 21:135
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-1-1-81
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-1-1-81
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error