- Volume 72, Issue 2, 2022
Volume 72, Issue 2, 2022
- Evolution, Phylogeny and Biodiversity
-
-
-
Phylogenomic and comparative analyses support the reclassification of several Komagataeibacter species as novel members of the Novacetimonas gen. nov. and bring new insights into the evolution of cellulose synthase genes
More LessThe genus Komagataeibacter harbours bacteria presenting the ability to produce increased levels of crystalline nanocellulose, as well as strains used in the industrial production of fermented products and beverages. Still, most of the studies of this biotechnologically relevant genus were conducted based on limited phenotypic methodologies and taxonomical classifications. In this work, a detailed analysis of the currently described genus Komagataeibacter was conducted based on phylogenomic analysis, unveiling the phylogenomic relationships within the genus and allowing a detailed phylogenetic analysis of biotechnologically important genes such as those involved in cellulose biosynthesis (bcs genes). Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analysis revealed that several type strains formed an independent genomic group from those of other Komagataeibacter , prompting their reclassification as members of a novel genus, hereby termed Novacetimonas gen. nov. The results support the reclassification of Komagataeibacter hansenii , Komagataeibacter cocois , Komagataeibacter maltaceti and Komagataeibacter pomaceti as novel members of the genus Novacetimonas. The Novacetimonas hansenii species is the proposed representative of the novel genus. Importantly, phylogenetic analysis based on cellulose biosynthesis genes (bcsABCD, bcsAB2XYC2, bcsAB3C3, bcsAB4), showed that the evolutionary history of these genes is closely related to the strain’s phylogenomic/taxonomic classification. Hence, the robust taxonomic classification of these bacteria will allow the better characterization and selection of strains for biotechnological applications.
-
-
-
-
Companilactobacillus salsicarnum Zheng et al. 2020 is a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacillus mishanensis (Wei and Gu 2019) Zheng et al. 2020
More LessLactobacillus mishanensis was isolated from Chinese traditional pickle, and validly published in October 2019. Lactobacillus salsicarnum was isolated from salami products in Germany, and effectively described in November 2019. In the reclassification of the genus Lactobacillus by Zheng et al. in April 2020, L. mishanensis was transferred to Companilactobacillus as Companilactobacillus mishanensis comb. nov., and Companilactobacillus salsicarnum was proposed as a novel species. In the present study, the relationship between C. mishanensis and C. salsicarnum was evaluated. The type strains of C. mishanensis and C. salsicarnum shared 100 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, 100 % pheS sequence similarity, 99.9 % rpoA sequence similarity, a 99.9 % average nucleotide identity value and a 99.5 % digital DNA–DNA hybridization value, indicating that they represent the same species. On the basis of the results presented here, we propose C. salsicarnum [Zheng et al. 2020] as a later heterotypic synonym of C. mishanensis (Wei and Gu 2019) [Zheng et al. 2020].
-
- ICSP Matters
-
- Corrigenda
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 75 (2025)
-
Volume 74 (2024)
-
Volume 73 (2023)
-
Volume 72 (2022 - 2023)
-
Volume 71 (2020 - 2021)
-
Volume 70 (2020)
-
Volume 69 (2019)
-
Volume 68 (2018)
-
Volume 67 (2017)
-
Volume 66 (2016)
-
Volume 65 (2015)
-
Volume 64 (2014)
-
Volume 63 (2013)
-
Volume 62 (2012)
-
Volume 61 (2011)
-
Volume 60 (2010)
-
Volume 59 (2009)
-
Volume 58 (2008)
-
Volume 57 (2007)
-
Volume 56 (2006)
-
Volume 55 (2005)
-
Volume 54 (2004)
-
Volume 53 (2003)
-
Volume 52 (2002)
-
Volume 51 (2001)
-
Volume 50 (2000)
-
Volume 49 (1999)
-
Volume 48 (1998)
-
Volume 47 (1997)
-
Volume 46 (1996)
-
Volume 45 (1995)
-
Volume 44 (1994)
-
Volume 43 (1993)
-
Volume 42 (1992)
-
Volume 41 (1991)
-
Volume 40 (1990)
-
Volume 39 (1989)
-
Volume 38 (1988)
-
Volume 37 (1987)
-
Volume 36 (1986)
-
Volume 35 (1985)
-
Volume 34 (1984)
-
Volume 33 (1983)
-
Volume 32 (1982)
-
Volume 31 (1981)
-
Volume 30 (1980)
-
Volume 29 (1979)
-
Volume 28 (1978)
-
Volume 27 (1977)
-
Volume 26 (1976)
-
Volume 25 (1975)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1973)
-
Volume 22 (1972)
-
Volume 21 (1971)
-
Volume 20 (1970)
-
Volume 19 (1969)
-
Volume 18 (1968)
-
Volume 17 (1967)
-
Volume 16 (1966)
-
Volume 15 (1965)
-
Volume 14 (1964)
-
Volume 13 (1963)
-
Volume 12 (1962)
-
Volume 11 (1961)
-
Volume 10 (1960)
-
Volume 9 (1959)
-
Volume 8 (1958)
-
Volume 7 (1957)
-
Volume 6 (1956)
-
Volume 5 (1955)
-
Volume 4 (1954)
-
Volume 3 (1953)
-
Volume 2 (1952)
-
Volume 1 (1951)