-
Volume 30,
Issue 4,
1980
Volume 30, Issue 4, 1980
- Book Reviews
-
- Original Papers Relating To Systematic Bacteriology
-
-
-
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Relationship Between Spiroplasma citri and the Corn Stunt Spiroplasma
More LessSpiroplasma citri and the corn stunt spiroplasma were compared by deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation. Homologies among Spiroplasma citri strains ranged from 93 to 100%, but between Spiroplasma citri and the corn stunt spiroplasma, the homology was about 68%. It is therefore concluded that the corn stunt spiroplasma and Spiroplasma citri may belong to the same species but to separate subspecies or biovars.
-
-
-
-
Tatlockia and Fluoribacter: Two New Genera of Organisms Resembling Legionella pneumophila
More LessDNA homology studies were performed with strains of Legionella pneumophila Brenner et al., 1979, including the type strain, ATCC 33152, and a group of seven previously unclassified bacteria which resemble L. pneumophila in growth characteristics and colonial morphology and by their content of large amounts of branched-chain fatty acids. The organisms studied include three isolates of the Pittsburgh pneumonia agent (PPA), TATLOCK, WIGA (ALLO1), MI-15 (ALLO2), and NY-23 (ALLO4). The purified DNAs were labeled with 32P in vitro by a nick translation method, which made it possible to achieve very high specific activities. Results of our hybridization experiments suggest that these previously unclassified organisms are not related to L. pneumophila at the genus level, and thus two new genera within the family Legionellaceae are proposed for them: Tatlockia and Fluoribacter. The type species of these genera are T. micdadei (Hebert et al., 1980) comb. nov. and F. bozemanae sp. nov., respectively. The type strain of T. micdadei is strain TATLOCK (= ATCC 33218), and the type strain of F. bozemanae is strain WIGA (= ATCC 33217).
-
-
-
Computer Methods for Describing Groups from Binary Phenetic Data: Preliminary Summary and Editing of Data
More LessSummarizing and editing binary phenetic data before further analysis are an accepted practice. The microbiologist tabulates basic information about a strain by feature matrix and uses this information as an aid in editing that matrix. Interactive computer technology can be used to aid in this process. Advantages of such computer-aided matrix editing include (i) preliminary analysis of the data, (ii) automation of routine operations, (iii) reduced costs of subsequent analyses, and (iv) improved results of subsequent analyses. The reduced costs and improved results are demonstrated by running a cluster analysis program on data before and after editing.
-
-
-
Computer Methods for Describing Groups from Binary Phenetic Data: Modification of Numerical Taxonomy Programs to Increase Flexibility
More LessThe logic of modifications to numerical taxonomy programs is described. The programs modified are to calculate and store interstrain similarities, to arrange the data by cluster analysis, and to calculate inter- and intragroup statistics. The modifications included increasing the efficiency of the similarity calculations, storing intermediate matrices on disks for later use, and permitting the calculation of group statistics on any arbitrary groups of strains as well as taxonomic groups without recalculating interstrain similarities. Changing communication paths of information allowed using the programs flexibly for ecological as well as taxonomic analyses, reduced program execution costs, increased program versatility, and reduced errors.
-
-
-
Red-Pigmented Micrococci: A Basis for Taxonomy
More LessFifty strains of red-pigmented, gram-positive, nonfermentative micrococci were studied, including organisms from diverse collections identified as Micrococcus roseus, M. agilis, “Sarcina erythromyxa,” “M. radiodurans,” “M. radiophilus,” and “M. radioproteolyticus” and miscellaneous unidentified strains usually labelled M. roseus (names in quotation marks are not on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:225-420, 1980). Although similar in physiological attributes (negative characters predominated), the cell wall structural profiles separated M. roseus and M. agilis (simple homogeneous profile) from “M. radiodurans” and the radiation-resistant group (complex, multilayered profile). Simple reactions (growth in 5% NaCl broth, growth at 37°C, and nitrate reduction) distinguished M. roseus from M. agilis, and acid production from glucose and other sugars distinguished “M. radioproteolyticus” from the rest. The members of the “M. radiodurans” group could be typified by physiological reactions but not with great reliability. Gas-liquid chromatography of extracted lipids showed that veritable M. roseus and M. agilis strains had at least 50% of fatty acids in the form of 15:0 branched chains. “M. radiodurans” and the rest had straight chains with a 16:1 component which formed at least 25% of total fatty acids and which was not possessed by M. roseus or M. agilis. Further studies were based on representative strains of clusters derived from the above-mentioned tests. Zymograms for nonspecific esterases and chromatograms of extracted pigments showed no identical patterns for any 2 of 10 strains. Absorption spectra for pigments had maxima at 450 to 510 nm. The guanine plus cytosine contents of the deoxyribonucleic acids ranged from 62 to 74 mol%: The M. roseus-M. agilis cluster was <69 mol%, and the radiation-resistant cluster was < 71 mol%. There was little deoxyribonucleic acid homology between M. roseus and M. agilis (8%) or among any of the rest (< 21%). The named radiation-resistant species showed <18% homology to each other, but alignments were detected in the miscellaneous group. Ribosomal ribonucleic acid (16S) cataloguing showed that “M. radiodurans,” “M. radiophilus,” and one of the miscellaneous radiation-resistant strains were related (S AB = 0.51 to 0.63) but that they had as little oligonucleotide similarity to M. luteus and M. roseus (S AB = 0.23) as they all did to Escherichia coli. It is concluded that “M. radiodurans” and its relatives are not species of Micrococcus and that they represent clones that separated from the main stem early in procaryotic evolution. There are at least five such species: “M. radiodurans,” “M. radiophilus,” “M. radioproteolyticus,” “M. erythromyxa” (Sarcina erythromyxa), and one other unnamed.
-
-
-
Acholeplasma morum, a New Non-Sterol-Requiring Species
More LessTwo acholeplasmas recovered from contaminated cell cultures or commercial fetal bovine serum were found to be similar in biochemical and serological properties. The organisms, although not requiring serum or cholesterol for growth, did require a supplement of 0.5% albumin and 10 μg of palmitic acid per ml to a serum-free medium for sustained growth in the absence of sterols. The growth of both organisms was inhibited in medium containing 20% horse serum, although smaller amounts of horse serum or 20% fetal bovine serum did not exert inhibitory effects. The two strains possessed biochemical properties typical of other non-sterol-requiring members of the Mycoplasmatales, and they were serologically distinct from seven established Acholeplasma species. On the basis of these findings and other morphological, biological, and serological properties of the organisms, it is proposed that these organisms represent a new species, Acholeplasma morum. Strain 72—043 (=ATCC 33211) is the type strain.
-
-
-
Photobacterium logei sp. nov., nom. rev.; Beneckea nereida sp. nov., nom. rev.; and Beneckea gazogenes sp. nov., nom. rev.
More LessThe names Photobacterium logei Bang et al., Beneckea nereida Baumann et al., and Beneckea gazogenes Harwood were not included in the recently published Approved Lists of Bacterial Names and hence have no standing in bacteriological nomenclature. However, these names are here revived for the same organisms with which they were originally associated and, by this action, now have valid status. According to the current rules of nomenclature, the authors of this present proposal, not the original authors, are to be cited as the authors of these names.
-
-
-
Revival of the Name Vibrio vulnificus
More LessThe name Vibrio vulnificus (Reichelt et al.) Farmer was validly published as a new combination in The Lancet, October, 1979. However, the editors of the Bacteriological Code did not include a mechanism to validate those names validly published in the literature outside the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology during October, November, or December, 1979. Thus, all these new names and combinations lost standing because they could not be included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. V. vulnificus comb. nov. is hereby proposed as a revived name so it can again have standing in nomenclature.
-
-
-
Planctomyces maris sp. nov., nom. rev.
More LessThe name Planctomyces maris Bauld and Staley 1976 was not included in the recently published Approved Lists of Bacterial Names and hence has no standing in bacteriological nomenclature. However, the name Planctomyces maris sp. nov. is herein revived for the same organism with which it was originally associated and, by this action, now has valid status. The type strain of P. maris is strain 534-30 (= ATCC 29201)
-
- Original Papers Relating To The Systematics Of Yeasts
-
-
-
Rhodosporidium paludigenum sp. nov., a Basidiomycetous Yeast from Intertidal Waters of South Florida
More LessRhodosporidium paludigenum sp. nov. has the phenotypic characteristics of the imperfect yeast Rhodotorula graminis and a bipolar incompatibility mating system, and is not sexually compatible with other Rhodosporidium species. The type strain of this new species is CBS 6566.
-
-
- Matters Relating To The International Committee On Systematic Bacteriology
-
-
-
Opposition to Recent Proposals Which Would Reject the Family Name Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia As Its Type Genus
More LessThe name Enterobacteriaceae was proposed in 1937 by Rahn to include many taxa which are now included in the family. Rahn’s proposal had several nomenclatural flaws, so with the retroactive application of the rules of 1948 International Bacteriological Code of Nomenelature, both Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937 and Enterobacter Rahn 1937 became illegitimate. However, since the name Enterobacteriaceae had become so widely used since 1937, the Judicial Commission voted to conserve it in 1958. Both the 1958 and 1975 Bacteriological Codes contained many statements that made Enterobacteriaceae a legitimate, conserved name and the only correct name for the family. After almost 20 years of universal acceptance, the name was challenged because it was the only family name not formed by adding “aceae” to the stem of the name of the type genus as required by Rule 21a of the 1975 Bacteriological Code. On 3 September 1978, the Judicial Commission voted to conserve the name Enterobacteraceae over Enterobacteriaceae even though the former name had never been published, had no description, was illegitimate, and had no standing in nomenclature. The arguments given to reject Enterobacteriaceae and its type genus Escherichia are not supported by the principles and rules of the Bacteriological Code. The proposal has not received the support of those who work with the family. In 1975 the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology’s Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae voted 12 to 2 against any change, and in May 1980, the American Society for Microbiology’s Subcommittee on Gram-Negative Facultatively Anaerobic Rods voted 7 to 0 against any change. To maintain stability in nomenclature and prevent confusion in the literature, the conserved family name Enterobacteriaceae with its designated and conserved type genus Escherichia should be maintained.
-
-
-
-
Proposal of Enterobacteriaceae fam. nov., nom. rev. to Replace Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937, nom. fam. cons. (Opin. 15, Jud. Comm. 1958), Which Lost Standing in Nomenclature on 1 January 1980
More LessThis article proposes the family name Enterobacteriaceae nom. rev. to fill the void in nomenclature that has existed since 1 January 1980, when the name of the family was not included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names.
-
- Errata
-
Volumes and issues
-
Volume 75 (2025)
-
Volume 74 (2024)
-
Volume 73 (2023)
-
Volume 72 (2022 - 2023)
-
Volume 71 (2020 - 2021)
-
Volume 70 (2020)
-
Volume 69 (2019)
-
Volume 68 (2018)
-
Volume 67 (2017)
-
Volume 66 (2016)
-
Volume 65 (2015)
-
Volume 64 (2014)
-
Volume 63 (2013)
-
Volume 62 (2012)
-
Volume 61 (2011)
-
Volume 60 (2010)
-
Volume 59 (2009)
-
Volume 58 (2008)
-
Volume 57 (2007)
-
Volume 56 (2006)
-
Volume 55 (2005)
-
Volume 54 (2004)
-
Volume 53 (2003)
-
Volume 52 (2002)
-
Volume 51 (2001)
-
Volume 50 (2000)
-
Volume 49 (1999)
-
Volume 48 (1998)
-
Volume 47 (1997)
-
Volume 46 (1996)
-
Volume 45 (1995)
-
Volume 44 (1994)
-
Volume 43 (1993)
-
Volume 42 (1992)
-
Volume 41 (1991)
-
Volume 40 (1990)
-
Volume 39 (1989)
-
Volume 38 (1988)
-
Volume 37 (1987)
-
Volume 36 (1986)
-
Volume 35 (1985)
-
Volume 34 (1984)
-
Volume 33 (1983)
-
Volume 32 (1982)
-
Volume 31 (1981)
-
Volume 30 (1980)
-
Volume 29 (1979)
-
Volume 28 (1978)
-
Volume 27 (1977)
-
Volume 26 (1976)
-
Volume 25 (1975)
-
Volume 24 (1974)
-
Volume 23 (1973)
-
Volume 22 (1972)
-
Volume 21 (1971)
-
Volume 20 (1970)
-
Volume 19 (1969)
-
Volume 18 (1968)
-
Volume 17 (1967)
-
Volume 16 (1966)
-
Volume 15 (1965)
-
Volume 14 (1964)
-
Volume 13 (1963)
-
Volume 12 (1962)
-
Volume 11 (1961)
-
Volume 10 (1960)
-
Volume 9 (1959)
-
Volume 8 (1958)
-
Volume 7 (1957)
-
Volume 6 (1956)
-
Volume 5 (1955)
-
Volume 4 (1954)
-
Volume 3 (1953)
-
Volume 2 (1952)
-
Volume 1 (1951)
Most Read This Month
