Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Two novel bacterial strains, designated MP11Mi and MP213Fo, were isolated from the burying beetle and subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic study. Strain MP11Mi was placed in the genus , showing the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities to HY366 (98.8% sequence identity), followed by HY002 (98.4%). The strain exhibited low genomic relatedness to its closest relatives [ANI (average nucleotide identity) <90% and dDDH (digital DNA–DNA hybridization) <37%], far below the accepted species thresholds (95–96% ANI and 70% dDDH), unambiguously supporting species-level distinctiveness. Strain MP213Fo was affiliated with the genus , with LMG 32378 as its closest relative. ANI (79.4–79.9%), dDDH (22.8–23.1%), average amino acid identity (82.5–83.8%) and percentage of conserved proteins (71.6–77.2%) values confirmed its clear separation from all hitherto recognized species of this genus. The genome of MP213Fo comprises a circular chromosome and a plasmid carrying conserved genus-specific features. Analysis of specialized biosynthetic potential identified 13 gene clusters in MP11Mi and 4 in MP213Fo, highlighting their capacity for specialized metabolite biosynthesis. Based on phylogenomic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic characteristics, strains MP11Mi and MP213Fo are proposed as representatives of two novel species, for which the names sp. nov. (type strain MP11Mi=DSM 113667=CCM 9219) and sp. nov. (type strain MP213Fo=DSM 113682=CCM 9218) are introduced.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
    • Principal Award Recipient: JuanGuzman
  • Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
    • Principal Award Recipient: AndreasVilcinskas
  • Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
    • Principal Award Recipient: AndreasVilcinskas
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007114
2026-04-08
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Pukowski E. Ökologische Untersuchungen an Necrophorus F. Z Morphol Ökol Tiere 1933; 27:518–586 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pukowski E. Die Brutpflege des Totengräbers. Entomol Bl 1934; 30:109–112
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Scott MP. The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annu Rev Entomol 1998; 43:595–618 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Degenkolb T, Düring R-A, Vilcinskas A. Secondary metabolites released by the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides: chemical analyses and possible ecological functions. J Chem Ecol 2011; 37:724–735 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y, Rozen DE. Gut microbiota in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides, provide colonization resistance against larval bacterial pathogens. Ecol Evol 2018; 8:1646–1654 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller CJ, Bates ST, Gielda LM, Creighton JC. Examining transmission of gut bacteria to preserved carcass via anal secretions in Nicrophorus defodiens. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225711 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shukla SP, Plata C, Reichelt M, Steiger S, Heckel DG et al. Microbiome-assisted carrion preservation aids larval development in a burying beetle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:11274–11279 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaltenpoth M, Steiger S. Unearthing carrion beetles’ microbiome: characterization of bacterial and fungal hindgut communities across the Silphidae. Mol Ecol 2014; 23:1251–1267 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vogel H, Shukla SP, Engl T, Weiss B, Fischer R et al. The digestive and defensive basis of carcass utilization by the burying beetle and its microbiota. Nat Commun 2017; 8:15186 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Heise P, Liu Y, Degenkolb T, Vogel H, Schäberle TF et al. Antibiotic-producing beneficial bacteria in the gut of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brinkrolf K, Shukla SP, Griep S, Rupp O, Heise P et al. Genomic analysis of novel Yarrowia-like yeast symbionts associated with the carrion-feeding burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. BMC Genomics 2021; 22:323 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1997; 47:479–491 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tsukamura M. Proposal of a new genus, Gordona, for slightly acid-fast organisms occurring in sputa of patients with pulmonary disease and in soil. J Gen Microbiol 1971; 68:15–26 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Reimer LC, Sardà Carbasse J, Koblitz J, Ebeling C, Podstawka A et al. BacDive in 2022: the knowledge base for standardized bacterial and archaeal data. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D741–D746 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Heine T, Zimmerling J, Ballmann A, Kleeberg SB, Rückert C et al. On the enigma of glutathione-dependent styrene degradation in Gordonia rubripertincta CWB2. Appl Environ Microbiol 2018; 84:e00154–00118 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiessl S, Schuldes J, Thürmer A, Halbsguth T, Bröker D et al. Involvement of two latex-clearing proteins during rubber degradation and insights into the subsequent degradation pathway revealed by the genome sequence of Gordonia polyisoprenivorans strain VH2. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:2874–2887 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kämpfer P, Rosselló-Mora R, Scholz HC, Welinder-Olsson C, Falsen E et al. Description of Pseudochrobactrum gen. nov., with the two species Pseudochrobactrum asaccharolyticum sp. nov. and Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1823–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kämpfer P, Scholz H, Huber B, Thummes K, Busse H-J et al. Description of Pseudochrobactrum kiredjianiae sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:755–760 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kämpfer P, Huber B, Lodders N, Warfolomeow I, Busse H-J et al. Pseudochrobactrum lubricantis sp. nov., isolated from a metal-working fluid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2464–2467 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Loperena-Barber M, Khames M, Leclercq SO, Zygmunt MS, Babot ED et al. Pseudochrobactrum algeriensis sp. nov., isolated from lymph nodes of Algerian cattle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005223 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ashford RT, Muchowski J, Koylass M, Scholz HC, Whatmore AM. Application of whole genome sequencing and pan-family multi-locus sequence analysis to characterize relationships within the family Brucellaceae. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1329 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP. Brucellaceae. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2018 pp 1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang Y, Fan Y, Zhang W, Wu G, Wang J et al. Bio-preparation of (R)-DMPM using whole cells of Pseudochrobactrum asaccharolyticum WZZ003 and its application on kilogram-scale synthesis of fungicide (R)-metalaxyl. Biotechnol Prog 2018; 34:921–928 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ge S, Dong X, Zhou J, Ge S. Comparative evaluations on bio-treatment of hexavalent chromate by resting cells of Pseudochrobactrum sp. and Proteus sp. in wastewater. J Environ Manage 2013; 126:7–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yusuf I, Garba L, Shehu MA, Oyiza AM, Kabir MR et al. Selective biodegradation of recalcitrant black chicken feathers by a newly isolated thermotolerant bacterium Pseudochrobactrum sp. IY-BUK1 for enhanced production of keratinase and protein-rich hydrolysates. Int Microbiol 2020; 23:189–200 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Guzman J, Sombolestani AS, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Cleenwerck I et al. Entomobacter blattae gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Acetobacteraceae isolated from the gut of the cockroach Gromphadorhina portentosa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71:004666 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Guzman J, Ortúzar M, Poehlein A, Daniel R, Trujillo ME et al. Agromyces archimandritae sp. nov., isolated from the cockroach Archimandrita tessellata. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005283 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Guzman J, Poehlein A, Glaeser SP, Schwengers O, Blom J et al. Pseudocitrobacter corydidari sp. nov., isolated from the Asian emerald cockroach Corydidarum magnifica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005497 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 2021; 7:000685 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lin H. SilentGene/Bio-py: Bio-py v1.0 version v1.0. Zenodo; 2021 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4954427
  41. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ankenbrand MJ, Keller A. bcgTree: automatized phylogenetic tree building from bacterial core genomes. Genome 2016; 59:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kämpfer P, Young C-C, Chu J-N, Frischmann A, Busse H-J et al. Gordonia humi sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:65–70 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Arenskötter M, Bröker D, Steinbüchel A. Biology of the metabolically diverse genus Gordonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70:3195–3204 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kämpfer P, Steiof M, Dott W. Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 1991; 21:227–251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Blom J, Wolf J, Benning S et al. Rhodococcus pseudokoreensis sp. nov. isolated from the rhizosphere of young M26 apple rootstocks. Arch Microbiol 2022; 204:505 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vieira S, Huber KJ, Neumann-Schaal M, Geppert A, Luckner M et al. Usitatibacter rugosus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Usitatibacter palustris sp. nov., novel members of Usitatibacteraceae fam. nov. within the order Nitrosomonadales isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004631 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37:911–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Kreig NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd edn 2007 pp 330–393 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Schumann P, Kalensee F, Cao J, Criscuolo A, Clermont D et al. Reclassification of Haloactinobacterium glacieicola as Occultella glacieicola gen. nov., comb. nov., of Haloactinobacterium album as Ruania alba comb. nov, with an emended description of the genus Ruania, recognition that the genus names Haloactinobacterium and Ruania are heterotypic synonyms and description of Occultella aeris sp. nov., a halotolerant isolate from surface soil sampled at an ancient copper smelter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38:101–129 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Meth 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wiertz R, Schulz SC, Müller U, Kämpfer P, Lipski A. Corynebacterium frankenforstense sp. nov. and Corynebacterium lactis sp. nov., isolated from raw cow milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4495–4501 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. Technical Note 101 Newark, DE (USA): MIDI-Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Derichs J, Kämpfer P, Lipski A. Pedobacter nutrimenti sp. nov., isolated from chilled food. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1310–1316 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Lipski A, Altendorf K. Identification of heterotrophic bacteria isolated from ammonia-supplied experimental biofilters. Syst Appl Microbiol 1997; 20:448–457 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Jin D, Kong X, Jia M, Yu X, Wang X et al. Gordonia phthalatica sp. nov., a di-n-butyl phthalate-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5128–5133 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tamura T, Saito S, Hamada M, Kang Y, Hoshino Y et al. Gordonia crocea sp. nov. and Gordonia spumicola sp. nov. isolated from sludge of a wastewater treatment plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3718–3723 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007114
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007114
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error