Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Two novel bacterial strains designated CR2-8 and HWE2-09 were isolated from mountain soil and plant root, respectively, and characterized using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that strain CR2-8 shared the highest sequence similarity with 301 (98.0%), and HWE2-09 with CC-FH12-1 (97.8%). The genome-based comparison indicated that both CR2-8 and HWE2-09 shared the highest relatedness with CU4, sharing 84.05% and 84.7 % orthologous average nucleotide identity and 29.3% and 30.3 % digital DNA–DNA hybridization, respectively, all of which were clearly below the suggested cutoffs for species distinction. For both strains, the major fatty acids were two summed features, one consisting of C ω7c and/or C ω6c and the other consisting of C ω7c and/or C ω6c, and also C 2OH and C. The major ubiquinone was Q-10, and the main polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidyldimethylethanolamine for both strains. The DNA G+C content of strain CR2-8 was 63.16 %, and that of strain HWE2-09 was 63.26 %. The phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic analyses indicate that each of the strains CR2-8 and HWE2-09 should be classified as a new species of , for which the names sp. nov. (type strain=CR2-8=KCTC 8939=JCM 36935) and sp. nov. (type strain=HWE2-09=KCTC 8940=JCM 36936) are proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Institute of Biological Resources
    • Principal Award Recipient: SeungBum Kim
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007100
2026-03-09
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Whitman WB. Genus Sphingobium. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2025 pp 1–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405–1417 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boss BL, Wanees AE, Zaslow SJ, Normile TG, Izquierdo JA. Comparative genomics of the plant-growth promoting bacterium Sphingobium sp. strain AEW4 isolated from the rhizosphere of the beachgrass Ammophila breviligulata. BMC Genomics 2022; 23:508 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang SM, Zhang L, Dai SK, Li X. A quick and efficient method for genomic DNA extraction from actinobacteria. Biotechnol 2007; 17:39–41
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jeon Y-S, Lee K, Park S-C, Kim B-S, Cho Y-J et al. EzEditor: a versatile sequence alignment editor for both rRNA- and protein-coding genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:689–691 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim YS, Roh SG, Kim SB. Gordonia insulae sp. nov., isolated from an island soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2079–2083 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Reichenbach H, Kohl W, Böttger-Vetter A, Achenbach H. Flexirubin-type pigments in Flavobacterium. Arch Microbiol 1980; 126:291–293 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria Cambridge: University Press; 1965
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vancanneyti M, Witt S, Abraham WR, Kersters K, Fredrickson HL. Fatty acid content in whole-cell hydrolysates and phospholipid and phospholipid fractions of Pseudomonads: a taxonomic evaluation. Syst Appl Microbiol 1996; 19:528–540 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sasser M. Technical Note 101: Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Nguyen TM, Kim J. A rapid and simple method for identifying bacterial polar lipid components in wet biomass. J Microbiol 2017; 55:635–639 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:W29–W35 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ogata H, Goto S, Fujibuchi W, Kanehisa M. Computation with the KEGG pathway database. Biosystems 1998; 47:119–128 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Li L, Liu H, Shi Z, Wang G. Sphingobium cupriresistens sp. nov., a copper-resistant bacterium isolated from copper mine soil, and emended description of the genus Sphingobium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:604–609 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim DU, Kim J. Description of Sphingobium psychrophilum sp. nov., a cold-adapted bacterium isolated from Arctic soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71:004705 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen H, Jogler M, Rohde M, Klenk H-P, Busse H-J et al. Sphingobium limneticum sp. nov. and Sphingobium boeckii sp. nov., two freshwater planktonic members of the family Sphingomonadaceae, and reclassification of Sphingomonas suberifaciens as Sphingobium suberifaciens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:735–743 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Young C-C, Arun AB, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Lai W-A et al. Sphingobium rhizovicinum sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Fortunella hindsii (Champ. ex Benth.) Swingle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1801–1806 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007100
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007100
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error