Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Low-temperature (34 °C) hydrothermal fluid was collected from Axial Seamount along the Juan de Fuca Ridge in the northeast Pacific Ocean. A thermophilic methanogen, designated strain Ax23, was isolated from this fluid. The archaeon was anaerobic, autotrophic and coccoidal and grew separately on H/CO and formate. Ax23 grew on NH and by fixing N, but did not grow on NO . The isolate grew at temperatures ranging from 33 to 75 °C (optimum 73 °C) and a minimum doubling time of 32 min, in the presence of 3–6% NaCl (optimum 3–4.5%) and pH 4.0–9.0 (optimum 6.0–8.0). It increased its growth yield (cells produced per mole of CH produced) when grown on 10 kPa H relative to 160 kPa H, suggesting that it is capable of a metabolic trade-off with varying H availability. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that the strain was 95.6–99.7% identical to other thermophilic species of the family in the kingdom . The complete genome of Ax23 was sequenced, which yielded a 1,662,948 bp chromosome with 1,663 protein-coding sequences and a 7,732 bp plasmid. Based on genome-relatedness index analyses and its phenotypic characteristics, strain Ax23 represents a novel species, for which the name is proposed. The type strain is Ax23 (=DSM 118471=JCM39656).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Award 80NSSC21K1240)
    • Principal Award Recipient: JamesF. Holden
  • National Science Foundation (Award OCE-1947776)
    • Principal Award Recipient: SarahK. Hu
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007098
2026-03-03
2026-03-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/76/3/ijsem007098.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007098&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sievert SM, Vetriani C. Chemoautotrophy at deep-sea vents: past, present, and future. Oceanog 2012; 25:218–233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ver Eecke HC, Butterfield DA, Huber JA, Lilley MD, Olson EJ et al. Hydrogen-limited growth of hyperthermophilic methanogens at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:13674–13679 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fortunato CS, Larson B, Butterfield DA, Huber JA. Spatially distinct, temporally stable microbial populations mediate biogeochemical cycling at and below the seafloor in hydrothermal vent fluids. Environ Microbiol 2018; 20:769–784 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Topçuoğlu BD, Stewart LC, Morrison HG, Butterfield DA, Huber JA et al. Hydrogen limitation and syntrophic growth among natural assemblages of thermophilic methanogens at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1240 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mehta MP, Baross JA. Nitrogen fixation at 92 degrees C by a hydrothermal vent archaeon. Science 2006; 314:1783–1786 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stewart LC, Jung J-H, Kim Y-T, Kwon S-W, Park C-S et al. Methanocaldococcus bathoardescens sp. nov., a hyperthermophilic methanogen isolated from a volcanically active deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1280–1283 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Huber H, Thomm M, König H, Thies G, Stetter KO. Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus, a novel thermophilic lithotrophic methanogen. Arch Microbiol 1982; 132:47–50 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Takai K, Inoue A, Horikoshi K. Methanothermococcus okinawensis sp. nov., a thermophilic, methane-producing archaeon isolated from a Western Pacific deep-sea hydrothermal vent system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1089–1095 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Francisco DE, Mah RA, Rabin AC. Acridine orange-epifluorescence technique for counting bacteria in natural waters. Trans Am Microsc Soc 1973; 92:416–421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones WJ, Leigh JA, Mayer F, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. Methanococcus jannaschii sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarine hydrothermal vent. Arch Microbiol 1983; 136:254–261 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ver Eecke HC, Kelley DS, Holden JF. Abundances of hyperthermophilic autotrophic Fe(III) oxide reducers and heterotrophs in hydrothermal sulfide chimneys of the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75:242–245 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Baross JA. Isolation, growth, and maintenance of hyperthermophiles. In Robb FT, Place AR. eds Archaea: A Laboratory Manual, Thermophiles Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 1995
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA et al. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 2015; 16:294 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:512–526 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C et al. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology 2012; 158:1005–1015 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992; 8:275–282 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schönheit P, Moll J, Thauer RK. Growth parameters (Ks, μmax, Ys) of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. Arch Microbiol 1980; 127:59–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Morgan RM, Pihl TD, Nölling J, Reeve JN. Hydrogen regulation of growth, growth yields, and methane gene transcription in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum deltaH. J Bacteriol 1997; 179:889–898 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Costa KC, Yoon SH, Pan M, Burn JA, Baliga NS et al. Effects of H2 and formate on growth yield and regulation of methanogenesis in Methanococcus maripaludis. J Bacteriol 2013; 195:1456–1462 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Topçuoğlu BD, Meydan C, Nguyen TB, Lang SQ, Holden JF. Growth kinetics, carbon isotope fractionation, and gene expression in the hyperthermophile Methanocaldococcus jannaschii during hydrogen-limited growth and interspecies hydrogen transfer. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85:e00180-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lipson DA. The complex relationship between microbial growth rate and yield and its implications for ecosystem processes. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:615 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rother M, Whitman WB, Boone DR, Koga Y. Methanococcaceae. In Whitman WB. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons; 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J 2016; 10:761–777 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Holden JF, Sistu H. Formate and hydrogen in hydrothermal vents and their use by extremely thermophilic methanogens and heterotrophs. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1093018 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kendall MM, Liu Y, Sieprawska-Lupa M, Stetter KO, Whitman WB et al. Methanococcus aeolicus sp. nov., a mesophilic, methanogenic archaeon from shallow and deep marine sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1525–1529 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007098
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007098
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error