Skip to content
1887

Abstract

An actinobacterial strain, designated TRA05-7, was isolated from a saline lake sediment in the Ngari Prefecture, Xizang Autonomous Region, China. The cells were Gram-stain-positive, aerobic and short-rod-shaped. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain TRA05-7 was most closely related to members of the genus , with the highest sequence similarity to 194 (98.48%). However, whole-genome phylogenetic analysis revealed a closer relationship with SYSU T00001, with the two strains forming a distinct cluster. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain TRA05-7 and were 77.3 and 20.7%, respectively. The genomic DNA G+C content was 65.7 mol%. Growth occurred at 4–40 °C (optimum 28 °C), pH 7–11 (optimum pH 7) and with 0–8% (w/v) NaCl (optimum 1%). The major menaquinones were MK-12, MK-11 and MK-13. Polar lipids consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, two unidentified glycolipids and one unidentified lipid. The major cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C, anteiso-C and anteiso-C. UV-Vis and HPLC analysis indicated that strain TRA05-7 had the ability to produce carotenoids. Based on phylogenetic, genomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic analyses, strain TRA05-7 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is TRA05-7 (=MCCC 1K10024=KCTC 59574).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 32360004)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiTuo
  • Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Foundation (Award Qian Ke He Jichu-ZK [2024] Yiban 270)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiTuo
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Award 2024JJ8015)
    • Principal Award Recipient: FangLiu
  • Zunyi City Science and Technology project (Award Zunyi City, Kehe HZ character (2025) No.269)
    • Principal Award Recipient: LiTuo
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007085
2026-03-05
2026-04-19

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Park YH, Suzuki K, Yim DG, Lee KC, Kim E et al. Suprageneric classification of peptidoglycan group B actinomycetes by nucleotide sequencing of 5S ribosomal RNA. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1993; 64:307–313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim SJ, Jang YH, Hamada M, Tamura T, Ahn JH. A novel member of the family microbacteriaceae isolated from an air sample in Korea. J Microbiol 2012; 50:673–679 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gtari M, Boussoufa D, Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Sbissi I. Taxonomic rearrangement of Salinibacterium, Leifsonia, Diaminobutyricibacter, Antiquaquibacter, Homoserinimonas and Glaciibacter: refining genus boundaries and proposal of two new genera – Orlajensenia gen. nov. and Leifsonella gen. nov.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:6809 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li J, Lu S, Jin D, Yang J, Lai X-H et al. Salinibacterium hongtaonis sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1093–1098 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu C-Y, Dong L, Li S, Lian W-H, Lin Z-L et al. Salinibacterium sedimenticola sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Curr Microbiol 2023; 80:142 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zheng Y, Wang J, Zhou S, Zhang Y, Liu J et al. Bacteria are important dimethylsulfoniopropionate producers in marine aphotic and high-pressure environments. Nat Commun 2020; 11:4658 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu Y, Beer LL, Whitman WB. Sulfur metabolism in archaea reveals novel processes. Environ Microbiol 2012; 14:2632–2644 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Guan TW, Lin YJ, Ou MY, Chen KB. Isolation and diversity of sediment bacteria in the hypersaline aiding lake, China. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236006 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fernández AB, Vera-Gargallo B, Sánchez-Porro C, Ghai R, Papke RT et al. Comparison of prokaryotic community structure from Mediterranean and Atlantic saltern concentrator ponds by a metagenomic approach. Front Microbiol 2014; 5:196 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Javor B. Hypersaline Environments: Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, 1st ed Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1989 pp 189–204
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Swan BK, Ehrhardt CJ, Reifel KM, Moreno LI, Valentine DL. Archaeal and bacterial communities respond differently to environmental gradients in anoxic sediments of a California hypersaline lake, the Salton Sea. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76:757–768 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao L, Fang B-Z, Liu Y-H, Huang Y, Wang S et al. Paracoccus salsus sp. nov., a novel slightly halophilic bacterium isolated from saline lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005473 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu J, Peng Z, Guan T-W, Yang H, Tian X. Diversity of actinobacteria in sediments of Qaidam Lake and Qinghai Lake, China. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:2875–2885 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Oren A. Halophilic archaea on Earth and in space: growth and survival under extreme conditions. Phil Trans R Soc A 2014; 372:20140194 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bennur T, Kumar AR, Zinjarde S, Javdekar V. Nocardiopsis species as potential sources of diverse and novel extracellular enzymes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 98:9173–9185 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim SH, Shin Y, Lee SH, Oh KB, Lee SK et al. Salternamides A–D from a halophilic Streptomyces sp. Actinobacterium J Nat Prod 2015; 78:836–843 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim J, Shin D, Kim S-H, Park W, Shin Y et al. Borrelidins C–E: new antibacterial macrolides from a saltern-derived halophilic Nocardiopsis sp. Mar Drugs 2017; 15:166 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Behera S, Das S. Potential and prospects of actinobacteria in the bioremediation of environmental pollutants: cellular mechanisms and genetic regulations. Microbiol Res 2023; 273:127399 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang M, Pan L, Liu L, Su C, Dou L et al. Phosphorus and nitrogen removal by a novel phosphate-accumulating organism, Arthrobacter sp. HHEP5 capable of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification: safety assessment, removal characterization, mechanism exploration and wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 2020; 312:123633 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Passari AK, Chandra P, Zothanpuia, Mishra VK, Leo VV et al. Detection of biosynthetic gene and phytohormone production by endophytic actinobacteria associated with Solanum lycopersicum and their plant-growth-promoting effect. Res Microbiol 2016; 167:692–705 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiang W, Sun J, Gao H, Tang Y, Wang C et al. Carotenoids production and genome analysis of a novel carotenoid-producing Rhodococcus aetherivorans N1. Enzyme Microb Technol 2023; 164:110190 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Silva TRE, Silva LCF Júnior, de Queiroz AC, Alexandre Moreira MS, de Carvalho Fraga CA et al. Pigments from Antarctic bacteria and their biotechnological applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2021; 41:809–826 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zerres S, Stahl W. Carotenoids in human skin. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2020; 1865:158588 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Clugston RD. Carotenoids and fatty liver disease: current knowledge and research gaps. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2020; 1865:158597 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Numan M, Bashir S, Mumtaz R, Tayyab S, Rehman NU et al. Therapeutic applications of bacterial pigments: a review of current status and future opportunities. 3 Biotech 2018; 8:207 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S et al. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol 2024; 41:msae263 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:D678–D689 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zheng J, Ge Q, Yan Y, Zhang X, Huang L et al. dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W115–W121 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P et al. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W339–W346 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pourmohsenin B, Wiese A, Ziemert N. AutoMLST2: a web server for phylogeny and microbial taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:W45–W50 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kelly KL. Inter-society colour council-national bureau of standards colour-name charts illustrated with centroid colours published in US. J Opt Soc Am 1964; 54:999–1002
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gonzalez C, Gutierrez C, Ramirez C. Halobacterium vallismortis sp. nov. An amylolytic and carbohydrate-metabolizing, extremely halophilic bacterium. Can J Microbiol 1978; 24:710–715 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Guo L, Tuo L, Habden X, Zhang Y, Liu J et al. Allosalinactinospora lopnorensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Nocardiopsaceae isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:206–213 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. In MIDI Technical Note 101 Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tuo L, Yan X-R, Li F-N, Yang C, An M-B et al. Amnibacterium flavum sp. nov., a novel endophytic actinobacterium isolated from bark of Nerium indicum Mill. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:285–290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PA, Krichevsky M et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Brown AD. Microbial water stress. Bacteriol Rev 1976; 40:803–846 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kapfhammer D, Karatan E, Pflughoeft KJ, Watnick PI. Role for glycine betaine transport in Vibrio cholerae osmoadaptation and biofilm formation within microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71:3840–3847 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Welsh DT. Ecological significance of compatible solute accumulation by micro-organisms: from single cells to global climate. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2000; 24:263–290 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kortstee GJ. The aerobic decomposition of choline by microorganisms. I. The ability of aerobic organisms, particularly coryneform bacteria, to utilize choline as the sole carbon and nitrogen source. Arch Mikrobiol 1970; 71:235–244 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007085
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.007085
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error