Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 76, Issue 3a

International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2025 Revision) Open Access

Preview this article:
Preview Magnify

There is no abstract available.

  • Received:
  • Published Online:
© 2026 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979
2026-03-09
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/76/3a/ijsem006979.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Oren A, Arahal DR, Christensen H, Göker M, Manaia CM et al. Preparing the 2025 revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:006666 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Whitman WB, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Fournier P-E, Oren A et al. Request for revision of the Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:584–593 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arahal DR, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Christensen H, Chuvochina M et al. Guidelines for interpreting the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and for preparing a Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005782 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Oren A, Arahal DR, Christensen H, Göker M, Manaia CM et al. Preparing the 2025 revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Zenodo 2025 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Arahal DR, Göker M, Hahnke RL, Manaia CM, Moore ERB et al. Statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes – July 2025 revision. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:006918 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Paenibacillus gen. nov. in validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB, list no. 51. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:852 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Editorial Committee of the Madrid Code International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code). The University of Chicago Press; 2024 https://www.iaptglobal.org/_functions/code/madrid accessed 26 October 2025
  9. Roop RM, Smibert RM, Johnson JL, Krieg NR. Designation of the neotype strain for Campylobacter sputorum (Prévot) Véron and Chatelain 1973. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:348 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitzgerald CB, Shkoporov AN, Sutton TDS, Chaplin AV, Velayudhan V et al. Comparative analysis of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii genomes shows a high level of genome plasticity and warrants separation into new species-level taxa. BMC Genomics 2018; 19:931 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelly DP, Wood AP. Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:511–516 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Sly LI, Cahill MM, Osawa R, Fujisawa T. The tannin-degrading species Streptococcus gallolyticus and Streptococcus caprinus are subjective synonyms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:893–894 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Raj HD. A new species - Microcyclus flavus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:61–81 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beiträge Biol Pflanz 1872; 1:127–224
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cato EP, Moore WEC, Nygaard G, Holdeman LV. Actinomyces meyeri sp. nov., specific epithet rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:487–489 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Xie CH, Yokota A. Reclassification of Alcaligenes latus strains IAM 12599T and IAM 12664 and Pseudomonas saccharophila as Azohydromonas lata gen. nov., comb. nov., Azohydromonas australica sp. nov. and Pelomonas saccharophila gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2419–2425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodfellow M, Pirouz T. Numerical classification of sporoactinomycetes containing meso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128:503–527 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernardet J-F, Segers P, Vancanneyt M, Berthe F, Kersters K et al. Cutting a gordian knot: emended classification and description of the genus Flavobacterium, emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae, and proposal of Flavobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (basonym, Cytophaga aquatilis Strohl and Tait 1978). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:128–148 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gelsomino R, Vancanneyt M, Snauwaert C, Vandemeulebroecke K, Hoste B et al. Corynebacterium mooreparkense, a later heterotypic synonym of Corynebacterium variabile . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1129–1131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang J, Li S, Liu J, LU CY, Manzoor S et al. Genome-based reclassification of Kineococcus aureolus Xu et al. 2017 as a later heterotypic synonym of Kineococcus terrestris Xu et al. 2017. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 74:006504
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pridham TG, Lyons AJ, Seckinger HL. Comparison of some dried holotype and neotype specimens of streptomycetes with their living counterparts. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1965; 15:191–237 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Rogosa M. Peptococcaceae, a new family to include the Gram-positive, anaerobic cocci of the genera Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, and Ruminococcus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1971; 21:234–237 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Breed RS, Murray EGD, Smith NR. eds Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th Edn Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1957
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Schwabacher H, Lucas DR, Rimington C. Bacterium melaninogenicum; a misnomer. J Gen Microbiol 1947; 1:109–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Lessel EF. Status of the name Proteus morganii and designation of the neotype strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1971; 21:55–57 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Sneath PHA. Correction of orthography of epithets in Pasteurella and some problems with recommendations on latinization. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992; 42:658–659 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (2008 revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Buchanani RE, John-Brooks R, Breed RS. In International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature in 4th International Congress for Microbiology, Report of ProceedingsJuly 20–26, 1947Copenhagen 1947 pp 587–506
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Buchanan RE, St. John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. J Bacteriol 1948; 55:287–306 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Buchanan RE, St John-Brooks R, Breed RS. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature. J Gen Microbiol 1949; 3:444–462 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Viruses Ames, IA: State College Press; 1958
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Editorial Board International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1966 Revision). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:459–490 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Statutes of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and Statutes of the Bacteriology Section of the International Associa-Tion of Microbiological Societies (1976 Revision). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1975. (Russian Translation Published1978 by USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Japanese Translation Published 1982 by Center for Academic Publications, Tokyo;Chinese Translation Published 1989 by Science Press, Beijing.)
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VDS, Seeliger HPR. et al. eds International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and Statutes of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology and Statutes of the Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Section of the International Union of Microbiological Societies (1990 Revision) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hedlund BP, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P, Konstantinidis KT, Murray AE et al. SeqCode: a nomenclatural code for prokaryotes described from sequence data. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1702–1708 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Brickell CD, Alexander C, Cubey JJ, David JC, Hoffman MHA et al. International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, 9th ed. Scripta Horticulturae 18. Leuven: ISHS; 2016 https://www.ishs.org/scripta-horticulturae/international-code-nomenclature-cultivated-plants-ninth-edition accessed 26 October 2025
  37. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed. London, UK: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature; 1999 https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-code-online/
  38. The International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature (ICVCN); 2021March https://ictv.global/about/code accessed 26 October 2025
  39. Greuter W, Garrity G, Hawksworth DL, Jahn R, Kirk PM et al. Draft BioCode (2011): Principles and rules regulating the naming of organisms. Taxon 2011; 60:201–212 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Theurillat J-P, Willner W, Fernández‐González F, Bültmann H, Čarni A et al. International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition. Appl Vege Sci 2021; 24:e12491 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. De Queiroz K, Cantino P. International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature (PhyloCode). Version 6 Taylor & Francis: CRC Press; 2020 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sneath PHA, McGowan V, Skerman VBD. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hill LR, Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Corrigenda to the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names: Edited for the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:508–511 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Amended Edition Washington: American Society for Microbiology; 1989
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sneath PHA. The preparation of the approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2247–2249 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Buchanan RE, Holt JG, Lessel EF. Index Bergeyana. An Annotated Alphabetic Listing of Names of the Taxa of the Bacteria Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1966
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Gibbons NE, Pattee KB, Holt JG. Supplement to Index Bergeyana Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1982
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Moore WEC, Cato EP, Moore LVH. Index of the Bacterial and Yeast Nomenclatural Changes Published in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology Since the 1980 Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (1 January 1980 to 1 January 1985). Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:382–407 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Moore WEC, Moore LVH. eds Index of the Bacterial and Yeast Nomenclatural Changes Published in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology since the 1980 Approved Lists of Bacterial Names Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1980
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria . Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; n.d https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608 accessed 26 October 2025
  51. Dye DW, Bradbury JF, Goto M, Hayward AC, Lelliott RA et al. Standards for naming pathovars of phytopathogenic bacteria and a list of pathovar names and pathotype strains. Rev Plant Pathol 1980; 59:153–168
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hauer T, Komárek J. CyanoDB 2.0 - On-line database of cyanobacterial genera. World-wide electronic publication, Univ. of South Bohemia & Inst. of Botany AS CR; 2020 http://www.cyanodb.cz accessed 26 October 2025
  53. Silva PC. Names of Classes and Families of Living Algae with Special Reference to Their Use in the Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) (Regnum Vegetabile Vol. 103) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1980
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Farr ER, Leussink JA, Stafleu FA. eds Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1979
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Farr ER, Leussink JA, Zijlstra G. eds Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) Supplementum I (Regnum Vegetabile Vol. 113) Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1986
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Fourtanier E, Kociolek JP. Catalogue of Diatom Names, California Academy of Sciences (updated 19 Sep 2011). n.d https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp accessed 26 October 2025
  57. Guiry MD, Guiry GM. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. n.d https://www.algaebase.org/ accessed 26 October 2025
  58. Kusber W-H, Jahn R. Annotated list of diatom names by Horst Lange-Bertalot and co-workers. Version 3.0; 2003 https://www.algaterra.org/Names_Version3_0.pdf accessed 26 October 2025
  59. Neave SA. eds Nomenclator Zoologicus, 1758–1935 London: Zoological Society; 1939
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Sharpe D. eds Index Zoologicus, 1800–1900 London: Zoological Society; 1902
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Levine ND, Corliss JO, Cox FEG, Deroux G, Grain J et al. A newly revised classification of the protozoa. J Protocol 1980; 27:37–58 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Aescht E. Catalogue of the Generic Names of Ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) Linz, Austria: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum; 2001
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Robert V, Stegehuis G, Stalpers J. The MycoBank engine and related databases. n.d accessed 26 October 2025
  64. Boekhout T, Bai FY, Daniel HM, Groenewald M, Robert V. Yeasts Trust Database. n.d https://theyeasts.org accessed 26 October 2025
  65. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses Master Species List A Spreadsheet of Current Taxonomy. n.d https://ictv.global/msl accessed 26 October 2025
  66. Species 2000 & ITIS. Catalogue of Life Leiden, the Netherlands: Naturalis; 2000 http://www.catalogueoflife.org accessed 26 October 2025
  67. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Logan NA, Berge O, Bishop AH, Busse H-J, De Vos P et al. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of aerobic, endospore-forming bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2114–2121 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Imhoff JF, Caumette P. Recommended standards for the description of new species of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1415–1421 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Mattarelli P, Holzapfel W, Franz CMAP, Endo A, Felis GE et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1434–1451 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Corbel MJ, Brinley Morgan WJ. Proposal for minimal standards for descriptions of new species and biotypes of the genus Brucella . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1975; 25:83–89 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Corbel MJ, Brinley Morgan WJ. Proposal for minimal standards for descriptions of new species and biotypes of the genus Brucella . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1975; 25:243 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Ursing JB, Lior H, Owen RJ. Proposal of minimal standards for describing new species of the family Campylobacteraceae . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:842–845 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  74. On SLW, Miller WG, Houf K, Fox JG, Vandamme P. Minimal standards for describing new species belonging to the families Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae: Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and Wolinella spp. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:5296–5311 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Bernardet J-F, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Cui H-L, Amoozegar MA, Dyall-Smith ML, de la Haba RR, Minegishi H et al. Proposed minimal standards for description of new taxa of the class Halobacteria . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:005290 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Arahal DR, Vreeland RH, Litchfield CD, Mormile MR, Tindall BJ et al. Recommended minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Halomonadaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2436–2446 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Quesada E, Arahal DR, Mormile MR, Oren A, Ventosa A et al. Recommended minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Halomonadaceae . Int J Syst Microbiol 2008; 58:2673 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Dewhirst FE, Fox JG, On SL. Recommended minimal standards for describing new species of the genus Helicobacter . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:2231–2237 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Boone DR, Whitman WB. Proposal of minimal standards for describing new taxa of methanogenic bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:212–219 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Schumann P, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Evtushenko LI. for the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of the Suborder Micrococcineae of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new genera and species of the suborder Micrococcineae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1823–1849 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  82. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mollicutes Proposal of minimal standards for descriptions of new species of the class Mollicutes . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1979; 29:172–180 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Brown DR, Whitcomb RF, Bradbury JM. Revised minimal standards for description of new species of the class Mollicutes (division Tenericutes). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2703–2719 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Whitcomb RF. Evolution and devolution of minimal standards for descriptions of species of the class Mollicutes: analysis of two Spiroplasma descriptions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:201–206 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Bovre K, Henriksen SD. Minimal standards for description of new taxa within the genera Moraxella and Acinetobacter: Proposal by the Subcommittee on Moraxella and Allied Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976; 26:92–96 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Lévy-Frébault VV, Portaels F. Proposed minimal standards for the genus Mycobacterium and for description of new slowly growing Mycobacterium species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992; 42:315–323 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  87. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Mycoplasmatales Minutes of meeting, 5 and 6 September 1973, Jerusalem, Israel. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1972; 22:184–188
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:166–178 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  89. de Lajudie PM, Andrews M, Ardley J, Eardly B, Jumas-Bilak E et al. Minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of rhizobia and agrobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2019; 69:1852–1863 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Graham PH, Sadowsky MJ, Keyser HH, Barnet YM, Bradley RS et al. Proposed minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of root- and stem-nodulating bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:582–587 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Freney J, Kloos WE, Hajek V, Webster JA, Bes M et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new staphylococcal species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:489–502 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Young JM, Bradbury JF, Gardan L, Gvozdyak RI, Stead DE et al. Comment on the Reinstatement of Xanthomonas citri (ex Hasse 1915) Gabriel et al. 1989 and X. phaseoli (ex Smith 1897) Gabriel et al. 1989: indication of the need for minimal standards for the genus Xanthomonas . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:172–177 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Oren A. How to name new taxa of archaea and bacteria. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria John Wiley & Sons, in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2019 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Trüper HG. How to name a prokaryote?: Etymological considerations, proposals and practical advice in prokaryote nomenclature. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1999; 23:231–249 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Trüper HG, Euzéby JP. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Appendix 9: Orthography. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2107–2113 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Buchanan RE. Chemical terminology and microbiological nomenclature. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1960; 10:16–22 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  97. MacAdoo TO. Nomenclatural literacy. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. eds Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1993 pp 339–358
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Oren A, Garrity GM, Schink B. Proposal to change Recommendation 12c of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4288 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Oren A, Schink B. Formation of names of genera of prokaryotes that end on -oides or -opsis. A proposal for addenda to Rule 65(2) and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2452–2453 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Oren A, Schink B. Use of Greek in the prokaryotic nomenclature: proposal to change Principle 3, Recommendation 6, Rule 7, Rule 65 and Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3559–3560 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Oren A, Schink B. Further guidelines for the formation of compound specific and subspecific epithets. A proposal to emend Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3561–3562 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Oren A, Vandamme P, Schink B. Notes on the use of Greek word roots in genus and species names of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2129–2140 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Oren A, Garrity GM, Schink B, Ventura S. ‘Localimania’ revisited: guidelines for the formation of specific epithets for names of prokaryotes based on names of institutions or their acronyms. A proposal for emendation of Appendix 9 to the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1618–1619 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Oren A, Chuvochina M, Schink B. The use of Greek and Latin prepositions and prefixes in compound names: proposed emendation of Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1831–1832 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Oren A, Chuvochina M, Ventura S. Formation of compound generic names based on personal names: a proposal for emendation of Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:594–596 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Trüper HG. How to avoid the most common mistakes while giving latin names to newly discovered prokaryotes. Microbiologia 1996; 12:473–475
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Trüper HG. Etymology in nomenclature of procaryotes. In Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM. eds Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. vol 1 New York: Springer; 2001 pp 89–99
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Trüper HG. The use of neolatin in biological nomenclature. Neulateinisches Jahrb J Neo-Latin Lang Lit 2004; 6:318–327
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Trüper HG. Is “localimania” becoming a fashion for prokaryote taxonomists?. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55: [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Murray RGE, Schleifer KH. Taxonomic notes: a proposal for recording the properties of putative taxa of procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:174–176 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Judicial Commission of the IJSB Minutes of the meetings, 2 and 6 July 1994, Prague, Czech Republic. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 45:195–196 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Murray RGE, Stackebrandt E. Taxonomic Note: Implementation of the provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:186–187 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Oren A. A plea for linguistic accuracy – also for Candidatus taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1085–1094 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Whitman WB. Modest proposals to expand the type material for naming of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2108–2112 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Whitman WB, Sutcliffe IC, Rossello-Mora R. Proposal for changes in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes: granting priority to Candidatus names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2174–2175 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Oren A, Garrity GM, Parker CT, Chuvochina M, Trujillo ME. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus list no.1. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3956–4042 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Oren A, Garrity GM, Trujillo ME. Registration of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa in the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3955 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Oren A, Garrity GM. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus list no. 2. Int J Syst Evol Microbol 2021; 71:004671 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Oren A, Garrity GM. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus list no.3. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005186
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Oren A. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus taxa. Candidatus List no. 4. Int J syst Bacteriol 2022; 72:005545 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Oren A, Göker M. Candidatus List. Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus phyla. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005821 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Oren A, Kostovski M, Göker M. Candidatus List No. 6. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2025; 75:006772 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Sutcliffe IC, Whitman WB. The van Niel International Prize for Studies in Bacterial Systematics, awarded in 2020 to Tanja Woyke. Int J Syst Bacteriol 2020; 70:5594–5595 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Oren A. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes: minutes of the open plenary meeting, Tuesday, 22 October 2024, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy, and via Teams. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:006621 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979
Loading
International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2025 Revision)
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 76, 006979 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006979
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error