Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Novel Gram-stain-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile rods, designated HTMS2 and HTMS3, were isolated from a biofilm on the membrane of a municipal sewage treatment membrane bioreactor in Nagaoka, Japan. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes placed them in the family , most closely related to A2P5 (94.14% similarity). Genome sequencing (2.52 Mb, 48.2% G+C) and phylogenomic analysis affiliated them with the uncultured genus lineage CTSOIL-112 in the Genome Taxonomy Database. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values to related taxa were below species thresholds (ANI ≤77.0%, dDDH ≤54.9%). In addition, average amino acid identity values to related taxa were ≤68.6%. Both strains are catalase- and oxidase-positive, reduced nitrate and utilized various carbohydrates but not -acetyl-glucosamine; they differed in sorbitol assimilation. The major respiratory quinone is Q-8, and the predominant fatty acids are summed feature 3 (C_16:1 ω7c/ω6c), summed feature 8 (C_18:1 ω7c/ω6c) and C_16:0. Genomic data supported a non-motile, Gram-stain-negative phenotype. Polyphasic analysis indicates that these strains represent a novel genus and species, gen. nov., sp. nov. (type strain HTMS3=NBRC 117344=LMG 34133).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • JST FOREST Program (Award JPMJFR225T)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MasashiHatamoto
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Award JP24H00333)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MasashiHatamoto
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006978
2025-11-20
2025-12-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/11/ijsem006978.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006978&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hai FI, Yamamoto K, Lee C-H. Membrane Biological Reactors: Theory, Modeling, Design, Management and Applications to Wastewater reuse: Iwa Publishing; 2018 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Takimoto Y, Miwa T, Hatamoto M. Initiation and progression of early-stage microbial-driven membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors: a review. Biofouling 2023; 39:459–472 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Miwa T, Nagatsuma S, Hirakata Y, Nagai M, Ikarashi T et al. Combination of a membrane bioreactor with a rotating biological contactor holding several diverse metazoans can reduce excess sludge with fouling mitigation. Water Res 2024; 266:122352 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Miwa T, Takimoto Y, Tokuda Y, Watari T, Yamaguchi T et al. Sewage-derived substances and dead microbial cells cause gel biofilm formation in membrane bioreactors treating real sewage. Chem Eng J 2023; 472:144882 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin S-Y, Hameed A, Tsai C-F, Young C-C. Zeimonas arvi gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Burkholderiaceae, harboring biphenyl- and phenolic acid-metabolizing genes, isolated from a long-term ecological research field. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2021; 114:2101–2111 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peeters C, Steyaert S, Shelomi M, Wieme AD, Depoorter E et al. Imbroritus primus gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultatively autotrophic bacterium from environmental water samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen W-M, Xie P-B, Young C-C, Sheu S-Y. Formosimonas limnophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Burkholderiaceae isolated from a freshwater lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:17–24 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vaz-Moreira I, Narciso-da-Rocha C, De Brandt E, Vandamme P, Silva Ferreira AC et al. Hydromonas duriensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from freshwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4134–4139 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim H, Bae M-J, Yu SM, Oh J, Lee CS et al. Ephemeroptericola cinctiostellae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from gut of an aquatic insect. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1546–1550 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D785–D794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Takimoto Y, Hatamoto M, Soga T, Kuratate D, Watari T et al. Maintaining microbial diversity mitigates membrane fouling of an anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor under starvation condition. Sci Total Environ 2021; 759:143474 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hatamoto M, Kaneshige M, Nakamura A, Yamaguchi T. Bacteroides luti sp. nov., an anaerobic, cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from methanogenic sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1770–1774 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S et al. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis Version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol 2024; 41:msae263 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Barrow GI, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, 3 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37:911–917 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37:540–546 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shen W, Sipos B, Zhao L. SeqKit2: a Swiss army knife for sequence and alignment processing. Imeta 2024; 3:e191 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:1037–1039 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:1925–1927 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pourmohsenin B, Wiese A, Ziemert N. AutoMLST2: a web server for phylogeny and microbial taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:W45–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hölzer M. POCP-nf: an automatic Nextflow pipeline for calculating the percentage of conserved proteins in bacterial taxonomy. Bioinformatics 2024; 40:btae175 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:W78–W82 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Bhattacharyya S, Lopez S, Singh A, Harshey RM. Flagellar motility is mutagenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2024; 121: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Miyazaki R, Kimoto M, Kohga H, Tsukazaki T. Structural basis of lipopolysaccharide translocon assembly mediated by the small lipoprotein LptM. Cell Rep 2025; 44:116013 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006978
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006978
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

EXCEL
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error