Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic and motile bacterium, designated as FT89, was isolated from mangrove sediment in Shenzhen, China. Phylogenetic analysis of strain FT89 was mostly related to , with 16S rRNA gene similarity of 99.66%. The genome size of strain FT89 was 5,065,293 bp and the calculated G+C molar content was 65.90mol%. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) value towards yielded 93.86% ANI and 53.2% dDDH. Although the 16S rRNA gene similarity is above 98.7%, the ANI and dDDH values are below the established species delineation thresholds (ANI <95% and dDDH <70%). Here, we confirm that strain FT89 represents a novel species. Phenotypic characterization revealed that cells of strain FT89 were ovoid to rod shaped, measuring 0.3–0.7 µm in width and 0.9–3.2 µm in length. Strain FT89 grew at 20–40 °C (optimum 35 °C) at pH 5.5–9.0 (optimum pH 6.0–7.0) with 0–9% (w/v) NaCl (optimum 1–2%). The cells of strain FT89 contained Q-10, and the major cellular fatty acids were composed of C cyclo 8 (41.7%) and summed feature 8 (C 7 and/or C 6) (32.4%). Based on phylogenetic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic analysis, strain FT89 should represent a novel species of the genus , for which the proposed name is FT89 (=MCCC 1K08485=KCTC 8079).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (Award 2025A1515010475)
    • Principal Award Recipient: XinxuZhang
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Award JCYJ20241202124403006)
    • Principal Award Recipient: XinxuZhang
  • Shenzhen University 2035 Program for Excellent Research (Award 2022B002)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MengLI
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Award KCXFZ20240903092800002)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MengLI
  • Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (Award 2023B0303000017)
    • Principal Award Recipient: MengLI
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006972
2025-11-19
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Su Y, Han S, Wang R, Yu X, Fu G et al. Microbaculum marinum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from deep seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:812–817 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang ZR, Yuan SM, Ye YQ, Zhang XY, Du ZJ. Microbaculum marinisediminis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6311 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Du H, Pan J, Zou D, Huang Y, Liu Y et al. Microbial active functional modules derived from network analysis and metabolic interactions decipher the complex microbiome assembly in mangrove sediments. Microbiome 2022; 10:224 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang C-J, Pan J, Duan C-H, Wang Y-M, Liu Y et al. Prokaryotic diversity in mangrove sediments across southeastern China fundamentally differs from that in other biomes. mSystems 2019; 4:e00442-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 1992; 9:945–967
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:512–526 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2020; 70:e102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:1925–1927 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D785–D794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (itol) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 23:127–128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:5825–5829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D309–D314 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lai QL, Liu XP, Yuan J, Xie SC, Shao ZZ. Pararhodobacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea water of the Indian Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:932–936 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006972
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006972
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error