Skip to content
1887

Abstract

[] has been found to be polyphyletic in relation to the type species , as endicated by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons and a number of other comparisons (enclosing the genus name in brackets). 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogeny confirmed that [.] is unrelated to other members of at the genus level and may be a candidate for a new genus with 95% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity to the closest related sequence belonging to the type strain of [] . The highest digital DNA–DNA hybridization value predicted from the whole-genomic sequence of the type strain of [.] was to the type strain of with 26%, confirming a separate taxonomic status at the species level. The phylogenetic comparison of concatenated conserved protein sequences determined in a previous study showed a unique position of the taxon investigated, which qualified for the status of a new genus since the highest conserved protein sequence identity was found to [.] with 86%. A new genus with one species, gen. nov., comb. nov., is proposed. The genus can be separated from other genera in the family by from 1 up to 12 phenotypic characters, and it is monotypic from other genera with respect to analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences as well as of predicted core genomic proteins. The type strain of is F73 (=NCTC 11411=CCUG 15566=DSM 22999=CPI 102678=ATCC 43328).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006867
2025-07-31
2025-12-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bisgaard M. Isolation and characterization of some previously unreported taxa from poultry with phenotypical characters related to Actinobacillus and Pasteurella species. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B 1982; 90:59–67 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark DS, Godfrey JF. Atypical Pasteurella infections in chickens. Avian Diseases 1960; 4:280 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mutters R, Ihm P, Pohl S, Frederiksen W, Mannheim W. Reclassification of the genus Pasteurella Trevisan 1887 on the basis of DNA homology with proposals for the new species Pasteurella dagmatis, Pasteurella canis, Pasteurella stomatis, Pasteurella anatis, and Pasteurella langaa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:309–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Schmid H, Hartung M, Hellmann E. Crossed immunoelectrophoresis applied to representative strains from 11 different Pasteurella species under taxonomic aspects. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1991; 275:16–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Olsen I, Fraser GJ. Phylogeny of the Pasteurellaceae as determined by comparison of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences. Zentralbl Bakteriol 1993; 279:35–44 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Busse H-J, Bunka S, Hensel A, Lubitz W. Discrimination of members of the family Pasteurellaceae based on polyamine patterns. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:698–708
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Christensen H, Foster G, Christensen JP, Pennycott T, Olsen JE et al. Phylogenetic analysis by 16S rDNA gene sequence comparison of avian taxa of Bisgaard and characterization and description of two new taxa of Pasteurellaceae. J Appl Microbiol 2003; 95:354–363 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Olsen JE, Bisgaard M. Comparative phylogenies of the housekeeping genes atpD, infB and rpoB and the 16S rRNA gene within the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1601–1609 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Korczak B, Christensen H, Emler S, Frey J, Kuhnert P. Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1393–1399 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Korczak BM, Kuhnert P. Phylogeny of pasteurellaceae. In Kuhnert P, Christensen H. eds Pasteurellaceae, Biology, Genomics and Molecular Aspects Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2008 pp 27–52
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Piechulla K, Bisgaard M, Gerlach H, Mannheim W. Taxonomy of some recently described avian Pasteurella/Actinobacillus-like organisms as indicated by deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness. Avian Pathol 1985; 14:281–311 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Christensen H, Bisgaard M. Classification of genera of Pasteurellaceae using conserved predicted protein sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2692–2696 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Truper HG, de’ Clari L. Taxonomic note: erratum and correction of further specific epithets formed as substantives (nouns) “in apposition”. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:615 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:166–178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse H-J, Blackall P, Bisgaard M et al. Pasteurellaceae. In In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea Whitman): Wiley & Sons; 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bisgaard M, Christensen H. Classification of Bisgaard’s taxa 14 and 32 and a taxon from kestrels demonstrating satellitic growth and proposal of Spirabiliibacterium gen. nov., including the description of three species: Spirabiliibacterium mucosae sp. nov., Spirabiliibacterium pneumoniae sp. nov. and Spirabiliibacterium falconis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71:004758 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Foster G, Bisgaard M. Reclassification of [Haemophilus] haemoglobinophilus as Canicola haemoglobinophilus gen. nov., comb. nov. including Bisgaard taxon 35. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:0048881 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. De Luca E, Álvarez-Narváez S, Maboni G, Baptista RP, Nemeth NM et al. Comparative genomics analyses support the reclassification of Bisgaard taxon 40 as Mergibacter gen. nov., with Mergibacter septicus sp. nov. as type species: novel insights into the phylogeny and virulence factors of a Pasteurellaceae family member associated with mortality events in seabirds. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:667356 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Christensen H, Sells SF, MacGlover C, Bisgaard M. Classification of Bisgaard taxon 6 and taxon 10 as Exercitatus varius gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:sp [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Chan J et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53:D20–D29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the Ad Hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006867
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006867
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error