Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 75, Issue 7

‘What’s in a name? Fit-for-purpose bacterial nomenclature’: meeting report Open Access

Abstract

Rapid and economical DNA sequencing has resulted in a revolution in phylogenomics. The impact of changes in nomenclature can be perceived as an absolute necessity of scientific rigour, coupled with the slight inconvenience of needing to re-learn names. In relation to practical aspects of microbiology, for example, infectious disease diagnosis, there may, however, be potential dangers. Historically, prokaryote classification has been based on multiple metabolic, physiological, biochemical and descriptive characteristics combined with the environmental source. Whole-genome sequence data have transformed our ability to determine evolutionary relationships. In addition, metagenomic and metataxonomic sequencing have resulted in the discovery of novel microbes, many of which are yet to be cultured. As a result, occasional name changes and additional prokaryote discoveries have accelerated at an unprecedented pace. Herein is a report of a Microbiology Society supported meeting of representatives of the communities of specialist taxonomists, phylogeneticists and applied microbiologists. Discussion included: recent advances in phylogenomics and the potential impact of nomenclature change on practical microbiology, e.g. plant pathology, food security, industrial microbiology, clinical microbiology and infectious diseases; the need, or lack thereof, for wider consideration and consultation prior to nomenclature change proposals which impact on practical microbiology; the application of the intricate and highly necessary rules of prokaryote nomenclature, which sometimes appear unfathomable to the non-specialist; and genome-based phylogenomics and the relationship with the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. The meeting resulted in the formation of the Ad Hoc Committee for Mitigating Changes in Prokaryotic Nomenclature under the auspices of the International Committee on Systematics for Prokaryotes.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): bacterial nomenclature , food safety , infection diagnostics , infectious disease , phylogenomics and plant pathology
© 2025 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006844
2025-07-22
2026-02-17

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/75/7/ijsem006844.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006844&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Madhaiyan M, Saravanan VS, See-Too W-S, Volpiano CG, Sant’Anna FH et al. Genomic and phylogenomic insights into the family streptomycetaceae lead to the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 72: Epub ahead of print October 2022 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Liao H, Lin X, Li Y, Qu M, Tian Y. Reclassification of the taxonomic framework of orders Cellvibrionales, Oceanospirillales, Pseudomonadales, and Alteromonadales in class Gammaproteobacteria through phylogenomic tree analysis. mSystems 2020; 5:e00543-20 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruz-Morales P, Orellana CA, Moutafis G, Moonen G, Rincon G et al. Revisiting the evolution and taxonomy of Clostridia, a phylogenomic update. Genome Biol Evol 2019; 11:2035–2044 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll KC, Munson E, Butler-Wu SM, Patrick S. Point-counterpoint: what’s in a name? Clinical microbiology laboratories should use nomenclature based on current taxonomy. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:e0173222 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Nayfach S, Roux S, Seshadri R, Udwary D, Varghese N et al. A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol 2021; 39:499–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Oren A, Arahal DR, Rosselló-Móra R, Sutcliffe IC, Moore ERB. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the international code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004918
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Whitman WB, Chuvochina M, Hedlund BP, Hugenholtz P, Konstantinidis KT et al. Development of the SeqCode: a proposed nomenclatural code for uncultivated prokaryotes with DNA sequences as type. Syst Appl Microbiol 2022; 45:126305 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Göker M, Moore ERB, Oren A, Trujillo ME. Status of the seqcode in the international journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 72:005754
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Arahal D, Bisgaard M, Christensen H, Clermont D, Dijkshoorn L et al. The best of both worlds: a proposal for further integration of Candidatus names into the International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006188 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Arahal DR, Bull CT, Busse H-J, Christensen H, Chuvochina M et al. Guidelines for interpreting the international code of nomenclature of prokaryotes and for preparing a request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005782 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Margos G, Wormser GP, Schwartz I, Markowicz M, Henningsson AJ et al. Evidence of taxonomic bias in public databases: the example of the genus Borrelia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2022; 13:101994 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Tortoli E, Brown-Elliott BA, Chalmers JD, Cirillo DM, Daley CL et al. Same meat, different gravy: ignore the new names of mycobacteria. Eur Respir J 2019; 54: Epub ahead of print 11 July 2019 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Adeolu M, Gupta RS. A phylogenomic and molecular marker based proposal for the division of the genus Borrelia into two genera: the emended genus borrelia containing only the members of the relapsing fever borrelia, and the genus Borreliella gen. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:1049–1072
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Pritchard L, Sharma P, Mazloom R, Pierce T, Irber L et al. GenomeRxiv: a microbial whole-genome database and diagnostic marker design resource for classification, identification, and data sharing. Access Microbiol 2022; 4:
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Mazloom R, Pierce-Ward NT, Sharma P, Pritchard L, Brown CT et al. LINgroups as a robust principled approach to compare and integrate multiple bacterial taxonomies. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2024; 21:2304–2314 Epub ahead of print 7 October 2024 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dicks J, Fazal M-A, Oliver K, Grayson NE, Turnbull JD et al. NCTC3000: a century of bacterial strain collecting leads to a rich genomic data resource. Microb Genom 2023; 9:mgen000976 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35:725–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Pallen MJ, Telatin A, Oren A. The next million names for archaea and bacteria. Trends Microbiol 2021; 29:289–298 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Pallen MJ, Rodriguez RLM, Alikhan N-F. Naming the unnamed: over 65,000 candidatus names for unnamed archaea and bacteria in the genome taxonomy database. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005482
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Moreno E, Middlebrook EA, Altamirano-Silva P, Al Dahouk S, Araj GF et al. If you’re not confused, You’re Not Paying Attention: Ochrobactrum Is Not Brucella. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:e0043823 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Touchon M, Perrin A, de Sousa JAM, Vangchhia B, Burn S et al. Phylogenetic background and habitat drive the genetic diversification of Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 2020; 16:e1008866 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Geurtsen J, de Been M, Weerdenburg E, Zomer A, McNally A et al. Genomics and pathotypes of the many faces of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2022; 46:fuac031 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Holmes A, Allison L, Ward M, Dallman TJ, Clark R et al. Utility of whole-genome sequencing of Escherichia coli O157 for outbreak detection and epidemiological surveillance. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:3565–3573 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dallman T, Ashton P, Schafer U, Jironkin A, Painset A et al. SnapperDB: a database solution for routine sequencing analysis of bacterial isolates. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:3028–3029 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Luo C, Walk ST, Gordon DM, Feldgarden M, Tiedje JM et al. Genome sequencing of environmental Escherichia coli expands understanding of the ecology and speciation of the model bacterial species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:7200–7205 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. MacKenzie K, Marshall J, Wright F, Gunn G, Holden N. Phylogeny and potential virulence of cryptic clade Escherichia coli species complex isolates derived from an arable field trial. Curr Res Microb Sci 2022; 3:100093 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Quinn GA, Banat AM, Abdelhameed AM, Banat IM. Streptomyces from traditional medicine: sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. J Med Microbiol 2020; 69:1040–1048 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kiepas AB, Hoskisson PA, Pritchard L. 16S rRNA phylogeny and clustering is not a reliable proxy for genome-based taxonomy in Streptomyces. Microb Genom 2024; 10:001287 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Domingo-Sananes MR, McInerney JO. Mechanisms that shape microbial pangenomes. Trends Microbiol 2021; 29:493–503 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. de Hoog S, Walsh TJ, Ahmed SA, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Alexander BD et al. A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Oren A, Arahal DR, Göker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R et al. International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. prokaryotic code (2022 revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005585
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Oren A, Garrity GM, Parte AC. Why are so many effectively published names of prokaryotic taxa never validated. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2125–2129
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmer M, Sutcliffe I, Venter SN, Hedlund BP. It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world. New Microbes New Infect 2022; 47:100991 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3210–3212 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:3895–3903 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Galaxy Team Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol 2010; 11:R86 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; 2015 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608
  42. Mallet J, Willmott K. Taxonomy: renaissance or tower of babel. Trends Ecol Evol 2003; 18:57–59
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lalucat J, Mulet M, Gomila M, García-Valdés E. Genomics in bacterial taxonomy: impact on the genus Pseudomonas. Genes 2020; 11:139 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Janda JM, Abbott SL. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:2761–2764 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Fenwick AJ, Carroll KC. Practical problems when incorporating rapidly changing microbial taxonomy into clinical practice. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019; 57:e238–e240 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Committee on Mitigating Changes in Prokaryotic Nomenclature n.d. Guidelines of the ad hoc committee on mitigating changes in prokaryotic nomenclature. Zenodo [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sangal V, Goodfellow M, Jones AL, Sutcliffe IC. A stable home for an equine pathogen: valid publication of the binomial Prescottella equi gen. nov., comb. nov., and reclassification of four rhodococcal species into the genus Prescottella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:005551 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006844
Loading

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error