Skip to content
1887

Abstract

A novel actinobacterium, designated strain 12N6, was isolated from tropical peat swamp forest soil in Rayong Province, Thailand. The taxonomic position was determined using a polyphasic approach. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain 12N6 was classified within the genus and showed the highest percentage similarity to YIM 46034 (98.7%), followed by HSS8-18 (98.0%) and YIM 48875 (97.9%). Strain 12N6 produced a single globose spore with a spiny surface on short sporophores of the substrate mycelia. The approximate genome size and DNA G+C content of strain 12N6 were 7.47 Mbp and 71.6 mol%, respectively. The highest average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values of genome sequences of 12N6 compared with closest species type strains (83.0% and 27.8%, respectively) are well below the thresholds for species delineation. The whole-cell hydrolysates of strain 12N6 contained -diaminopimelic acid, glucose, mannose, arabinose, xylose and ribose. The polar lipid profile comprised diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol. The major cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C, iso-C and iso-C. The analysis of phylogenetic, genomic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics revealed that strain 12N6 is considered to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 12N6 (=TBRC 19149=NBRC 117121).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Research Promotion and Technology Transfer Center (RPTTC), Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Sean Campus, Thailand (Award Grant year 2022)
    • Principal Award Recipient: RatchaneeMingma
  • Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Thailand (Award KPS-RDI 2023-002)
    • Principal Award Recipient: RatchaneeMingma
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006825
2025-06-24
2026-04-15

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Wiese J, Jiang Y, Tang S-K, Thiel V, Schmaljohann R et al. A new member of the family Micromonosporaceae, Planosporangium flavigriseum gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1324–1331 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao Y-R, Wang Q, Jin R-X, Jiang Y, Lai H-X et al. Planosporangium mesophilum sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of Bletilla striata. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1330–1333 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Thawai C, Thamsathit W, Kudo T. Planosporangium thailandense sp. nov., isolated from soil from a Thai hot spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1051–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Küster E, Williams ST. Selection of media for isolation of Streptomycetes. Nature 1964; 202:928–929 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cross T, Maciver AM, Lacey J. The thermophilic actinomycetes in mouldy hay: Micropolyspora faeni sp.nov. Journal of General Microbiology 1968; 50:351–359 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Také A, Matsumoto A, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Streptomyces lactacystinicus sp. nov. and Streptomyces cyslabdanicus sp. nov., producing lactacystin and cyslabdan, respectively. J Antibiot 2015; 68:322–327 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mingma R, Pathom-aree W, Trakulnaleamsai S, Thamchaipenet A, Duangmal K. Isolation of rhizospheric and roots endophytic actinomycetes from leguminosae plant and their activities to inhibit soybean pathogen, Xanthomonas campestris pv. glycine. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 30:271–280 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chun J. Computer Assisted Classification and Identification of Actinomycetes. PhD thesis University of Newcastle; UK: 1995
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh H-S, Cho JH et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006421 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021; 38:3022–3027 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:1–15 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 2023; 51:W46–W50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Luedemann GM. Micromonospora purpureochromogenes (waksman and curtis 1916) comb. nov.(subjective synonym: Micromonospora fusca jensen 1932). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1971; 21:240–247
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones KL. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol 1949; 57:141–145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kelly K. Inter-Society Color Council–National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CH-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the Nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EMH, Sneath PHA et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. Microbiology 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gordon RE, Mihm JM. A comparative study of some strains received as nocardiae. J Bacteriol 1957; 73:15–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Becker B, Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. Chemical composition of cell-wall preparations from strains of various form-genera of aerobic actinomycetes. Appl Microbiol 1965; 13:236–243 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tomiyasu I. Mycolic acid composition and thermally adaptative changes in Nocardia asteroides. J Bacteriol 1982; 151:828–837 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Minnikin D, Patel P, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1977; 27:104–117
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu C, Lu X, Qin M, Wang Y, Ruan J. Analysis of menaquinone compound in microbial cells by HPLC. Microbiol 1989176–178
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids Newark, DE: MIDI; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006825
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006825
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error