Skip to content
1887

Abstract

In the current study, we evaluated the taxonomic relationship between and through a comprehensive comparison of phenotypic and genomic characteristics, as well as phylogenetic analysis. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains and shared a sequence similarity of 99.65%, which was above the threshold value (98.65%) for bacterial species delineation. In addition, whole-genome comparisons revealed that DSM 935 and DSM 2950 shared 97.06% average nucleotide identity by (ANIb), 98.38% average nucleotide identity using MUMmer (ANIm), 97.77% average amino acid identity and 84.80% digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values. These scores exceed the threshold criteria for bacterial species delineation, strongly suggesting that these species belong to the same species. Furthermore, phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses provided additional evidence that DSM 935 and DSM 2950 are very closely related to each other. Additionally, the phenotypic features of these species further revealed that they belong to the single species. On the basis of the results presented here and the principle of priority in nomenclature, (Kaneuchi . 1976) Liu . 2008 should be considered a later heterotypic synonym of (Prévot 1941) Liu . 2008.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006823
2025-07-02
2026-04-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature n.d https://lpsn.dsmz.de/ accessed 30 June 2025
  2. AR P. Sur une nouvelle espèce de streptocoque anaérobie gazogène: Streptococcus productus nov. spec. C R Soc Biol 1941; 135:105–107
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Smith LDS. Genus V. Peptostreptococcus Kluyver and van Niel. In Breed RS, Murray EGD, Smith NR. eds Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 7th Edn Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1957 pp 533–541
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu C, Finegold SM, Song Y, Lawson PA. Reclassification of Clostridium coccoides, Ruminococcus hansenii, Ruminococcus hydrogenotrophicus, Ruminococcus luti, Ruminococcus productus and Ruminococcus schinkii as Blautia coccoides gen. nov., comb. nov., Blautia hansenii comb. nov., Blautia hydrogenotrophica comb. nov., Blautia luti comb. nov., Blautia producta comb. nov., Blautia schinkii comb. nov. and description of Blautia wexlerae sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1896–1902 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LPSN-List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature Blautia producta n.d https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/blautia-producta accessed 30 June 2025
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaneuchi C, Benno Y, Mitsuoka T. Clostridium coccoides, a new species from the feces of mice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1976; 26:482–486
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LPSN-List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature Blautia coccoides n.d https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/blautia-coccoides accessed 30 June 2025
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeon Y-S, Chung H, Park S, Hur I, Lee J-H et al. jPHYDIT: a JAVA-based integrated environment for molecular phylogeny of ribosomal RNA sequences. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3171–3173 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S et al. MEGA12: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Mol Biol Evol 2024; 41:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:006300 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:D801–D807 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:1–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Traore SI, Azhar EI, Yasir M, Bibi F, Fournier P-E et al. Description of “Blautia phocaeensis” sp. nov. and “Lachnoclostridium edouardi” sp. nov., isolated from healthy fresh stools of Saudi Arabia Bedouins by culturomics. New Microbes New Infect 2017; 19:129–131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Park S-K, Kim M-S, Roh SW, Bae J-W. Blautia stercoris sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:776–779 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lawson PA, Finegold SM. Reclassification of Ruminococcus obeum as Blautia obeum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:789–793 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Durand GA, Pham T, Ndongo S, Traore SI, Dubourg G et al. Blautia massiliensis sp. nov., isolated from a fresh human fecal sample and emended description of the genus Blautia. Anaerobe 2017; 43:47–55 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bonnet M, Ricaboni D, Mailhe M, Vitton V, Benezech A et al. Genome sequence and description of Coprococcus phoceensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new bacterial genus isolated from the human left colon. New Microbes New Infect 2019; 30:100548 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim J-S, Park J-E, Lee KC, Choi S-H, Oh BS et al. Blautia faecicola sp. nov., isolated from faeces from a healthy human. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2059–2065 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu X, Mao B, Gu J, Wu J, Cui S et al. Blautia-a new functional genus with potential probiotic properties?. Gut Microbes 2021; 13:1–21 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Maturana JL, Cárdenas JP. Insights on the evolutionary genomics of the Blautia genus: potential new species and genetic content among lineages. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:660920 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Habib N, Narsing Rao MP, Jan SA, Banerjee A, Thamchaipenet A et al. Genome-based reclassification of picrophilus torridus zillig et al. 1996 as a later heterotypic synonym of picrophilus oshimae schleper et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1996; 73:005851
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Teeling H, Meyerdierks A, Bauer M, Amann R, Glöckner FO. Application of tetranucleotide frequencies for the assignment of genomic fragments. Environ Microbiol 2004; 6:938–947 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang Y, Ni K, Wang D, Wu X, Wei Y. Genome-based reclassification of salipiger manganoxidans (rajasabapathy et al) wirth et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of salipiger marinus (lai et al. 2011) wirth et al. 2018. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 74:006329
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083ᵀ, the type strain (U5/41ᵀ) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 2014; 9:2 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Madhaiyan M, Wirth JS, Saravanan VS. Phylogenomic analyses of the Staphylococcaceae family suggest the reclassification of five species within the genus Staphylococcus as heterotypic synonyms, the promotion of five subspecies to novel species, the taxonomic reassignment of five Staphylococcus species to Mammaliicoccus gen. nov., and the formal assignment of Nosocomiicoccus to the family Staphylococcaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5926–5936 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang L, Han HL. Cellulosimicrobium fucosivorans is a later heterotypic synonym of Cellulosimicrobium composti. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:005848 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ezaki T, Li N, Kawamura Y. The anaerobic gram-positive, cocci. In Dworkin M, Fallow ER, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. eds In The Prokaryotes v New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006 pp 795–808
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sneath PH, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co; 1986
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006823
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.006823
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error